Incidents and Complications of Permanent Venous Central Access Systems: A Series of 1,460 Cases

Background Implanted venous access devices or permanent central venous access systems (PCVASs) are routinely used in oncologic patients. Complications can occur during the implantation or use of such devices. We describe such complications of the PCVAS and their management. Methods Our retrospective study included 1,460 cases in which PCVAS was implanted in the 11 years between January 2002 and January 2013, including 810 women and 650 men with an average age of 45.2 years. We used polyurethane or silicone catheters. The site of insertion and the surgical or percutaneous procedure were selected on the basis of clinical data and disease information. The subclavian and cephalic veins were our most common sites of insertion. Results About 1,100 cases (75%) underwent surgery by training surgeons and 360 patients by expert surgeons. Perioperative incidents occurred in 33% and 12% of these patients, respectively. Incidents (28%) included technical difficulties (n=64), a subcutaneous hematoma (n=37), pneumothoraces (n=15), and an intrapleural catheter (n=1). Complications in the short and medium term were present in 14.2% of the cases. Distortion and rupture of the catheter (n=5) were noted in the costoclavicular area (pinch-off syndrome). There were 5 cases of catheter migration into the jugular vein (n=1), superior vena cava (n=1), and heart cavities (n=3). No patient died of PCVAS insertion or complication. Conclusion PCVAS complications should be diagnosed early and treated with probable removal of this material for preventing any life-threatening outcome associated with complicated PVCAS.

[1]  J. Choi,et al.  Multiple Embolic Aortic Valve Endocarditis with Small Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Adult , 2014, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  Sang-Ho Cho,et al.  Normothermic Cardiac Surgery with Warm Blood Cardioplegia in Patient with Cold Agglutinins , 2014, The Korean journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  G. Drissi,et al.  Iatrogenic pneumothorax: experience of a Moroccan Emergency Center. , 2013, Revista portuguesa de pneumologia.

[4]  C. Fournier,et al.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[5]  A. Lefort,et al.  Complications infectieuses liées aux chambres implantables : caractéristiques et prise en charge , 2010 .

[6]  I. Inan,et al.  Management of malignant pleural effusion and ascites by a triple access multi perforated large diameter catheter port system , 2008, World journal of surgical oncology.

[7]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  Herwart Müller Risiken und Komplikationen implantierter Kathetersysteme , 2006 .

[9]  D. Chan,et al.  An alternative technique for totally implantable central venous access devices. A retrospective study of 1311 cases. , 2006, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  A. Zerati,et al.  Totally implantable venous catheters for chemotherapy: experience in 500 patients , 2004, Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina.

[11]  S. Merigliano,et al.  Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques. , 2004, Chirurgia italiana.

[12]  A. Luciani,et al.  Catheter-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients: a prospective study based on Doppler US. , 2002, Radiology.

[13]  John Wu,et al.  Comparison of Venography and Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Asymptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis in the Upper Body in Children , 2002, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[14]  M. Beckmann,et al.  Platzierung und Pflege von venösen Verweilkathetern und Portsystemen , 2000, Der Gynäkologe.

[15]  G. Marchal,et al.  Repositioning and leaving in situ the central venous catheter during percutaneous treatment of associated superior vena cava syndrome: A report of eight cases , 1999, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[16]  E. Bow,et al.  Totally implantable venous access ports systems for patients receiving chemotherapy for solid tissue malignancies: A randomized controlled clinical trial examining the safety, efficacy, costs, and impact on quality of life. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  E. Desruennes [Mechanical complications at implantation sites]. , 1999, Pathologie-biologie.

[18]  M. Hauer-Jensen,et al.  Mode of chemotherapy does not affect complications with an implantable venous access device , 1997, Cancer.

[19]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Infectious Morbidity Associated with Long-Term Use of Venous Access Devices in Patients with Cancer , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  J. Edney,et al.  Utility of duplex ultrasound in the diagnosis of asymptomatic catheter‐induced subclavian vein thrombosis. , 1991, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[21]  L. Goodman,et al.  Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. , 1990, Radiology.

[22]  M Borow,et al.  Evaluation of Central Venous Catheter Thrombogenicity , 1985, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[23]  J. Niederhuber,et al.  Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. , 1982, Surgery.

[24]  D. Lebeaux,et al.  [Totally implanted access port-related infections: features and management]. , 2010, La Revue de medecine interne.

[25]  A. Frydrychowicz,et al.  Complete caval thrombosis secondary to an implanted venous port--a case study. , 2008, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[26]  S. Loibl,et al.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence. , 2008, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[27]  S. Robard,et al.  [Outcome of usage protocols on implantable devices]. , 1995, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[28]  S. Robard,et al.  Évolution des protocoles d'utilisation des chambres implantables , 1995 .