Analysis of non-symmetrical flapping airfoils

Simulations have been done to assess the lift, thrust and propulsive efficiency of different types of non-symmetrical airfoils under different flapping configurations. The variables involved are reduced frequency, Strouhal number, pitch amplitude and phase angle. In order to analyze the variables more efficiently, the design of experiments using the response surface methodology is applied. Results show that both the variables and shape of the airfoil have a profound effect on the lift, thrust, and efficiency. By using non-symmetrical airfoils, average lift coefficient as high as 2.23 can be obtained. The average thrust coefficient and efficiency also reach high values of 2.53 and 0.61, respectively. The lift production is highly dependent on the airfoil’s shape while thrust production is influenced more heavily by the variables. Efficiency falls somewhere in between. Two-factor interactions are found to exist among the variables. This shows that it is not sufficient to analyze each variable individually. Vorticity diagrams are analyzed to explain the results obtained. Overall, the S1020 airfoil is able to provide relatively good efficiency and at the same time generate high thrust and lift force. These results aid in the design of a better ornithopter’s wing.

[1]  G D E Povel,et al.  Leading-Edge Vortex Lifts Swifts , 2004, Science.

[2]  Mao Sun,et al.  The influence of the wake of a flapping wing on the production of aerodynamic forces , 2005 .

[3]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Optimal Thrust Development in Oscillating Foils with Application to Fish Propulsion , 1993 .

[4]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils for Maximum Thrust and Propulsive Efficiency , 2005 .

[5]  Wei Shyy,et al.  Near wake vortex dynamics of a hovering hawkmoth , 2009 .

[6]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computing Method for All Flow Speeds , 1997 .

[7]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Thrust Generation Caused by Flapping Airfoils in a Biplane Configuration , 2003 .

[8]  Carlos E. S. Cesnik,et al.  Computational aerodynamics of low Reynolds number plunging, pitching and flexible wings for MAV applications , 2008 .

[9]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Flying and swimming animals cruise at a Strouhal number tuned for high power efficiency , 2003, Nature.

[10]  Robert D. Falgout,et al.  The Design and Implementation of hypre, a Library of Parallel High Performance Preconditioners , 2006 .

[11]  Paul G. Mathews,et al.  Design of Experiments with MINITAB , 2004 .

[12]  Afzal Suleman,et al.  A numerical study of the propulsive efficiency of a flapping hydrofoil , 2003 .

[13]  T. Mueller,et al.  AERODYNAMICS OF SMALL VEHICLES , 2003 .

[14]  Dongjoo Kim,et al.  A Second-Order Time-Accurate Finite Volume Method for Unsteady Incompressible Flow on Hybrid Unstructured Grids , 2000 .

[15]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion , 2004 .

[16]  Parviz Moin,et al.  The structure of two-dimensional separation , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering , 2003 .

[18]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  A Collaborative Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Flapping-Wing Propulsion , 2002 .

[19]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils for Maximum Thrust , 2003 .

[20]  R. Löhner,et al.  Simulation of flow about flapping airfoils using a finite element incompressible flow solver , 1999 .

[21]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils For Maximum Thrust and Propulsive Efficiency , 2005 .

[22]  R. Ramamurti,et al.  Simulation of Flow About Flapping Airfoils Using Finite Element Incompressible Flow Solver , 2001 .

[23]  M. Koochesfahani.  Vortical patterns in the wake of an oscillating airfoil , 1987 .

[24]  J. Lai,et al.  Jet characteristics of a plunging airfoil , 1999 .