Sex differences in neural efficiency: Are they due to the stereotype threat effect?☆

Highlights • The effect of sex stereotype on mental rotation performance was tested.• EEG activation was measured as an indicator of cortical arousal.• Sex differences in neural efficiency are not the result of activated stereotypes.• Stereotype threat modifies the IQ-brain activation relationship.

[1]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[2]  D. Lubinski.  Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development , 2010 .

[3]  C Neuper,et al.  Intelligence and working memory systems: evidence of neural efficiency in alpha band ERD. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency: further evidence of the influence of task content and sex on the brain-IQ relationship. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Michael Johns,et al.  Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M. Wraga,et al.  Neural basis of stereotype-induced shifts in women's mental rotation performance. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[7]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  D. Geary,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics , 2022 .

[9]  P. Huguet,et al.  Stereotype Threat Undermines Intellectual Performance by Triggering a Disruptive Mental Load , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. , 2007, Emotion.

[11]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  Whistling Vivaldi: And Other Clues to How Stereotypes Affect Us , 2010 .

[12]  Nancy C Andreasen,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: evaluation of tissue volume, tissue composition and surface anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[13]  S. Spencer,et al.  Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Regional glucose metabolic changes after learning a complex visuospatial/motor task: a positron emission tomographic study , 1992, Brain Research.

[15]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Following the instructions!: Effects of gender beliefs in mental rotation , 2006 .

[16]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Sex differences in human EEG theta oscillations during spatial navigation in virtual reality. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Rex E. Jung,et al.  The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency: The influence of task content and sex on the brain–IQ relationship , 2002 .

[19]  S. Harkins,et al.  Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Christian S. Crandall,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Arousal: Effects on Women's Math Performance , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[21]  William M. Kelley,et al.  The Negative Consequences of Threat , 2008, Psychological science.

[22]  Conor V Dolan,et al.  Stereotype threat and group differences in test performance: a question of measurement invariance. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  Chad E. Forbes,et al.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. , 2008, Psychological review.

[24]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Intelligence and neural efficiency , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[25]  N. Jausovec,et al.  Spatial rotation and recognizing emotions: Gender related differences in brain activity , 2008 .

[26]  J. Keller.  When negative stereotypic expectancies turn into challenge or threat : The moderating role of regulatory focus , 2007 .

[27]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Rising to the threat: Reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge , 2010 .

[28]  Diane F. Halpern,et al.  A Cognitive-Process Taxonomy for Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 2004 .

[29]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses ☆ ☆☆ , 2008 .

[30]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[31]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[32]  M. Benedek,et al.  Investigating Neural Efficiency in the Visuo-Spatial Domain: An fmri Study , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  R. Haier,et al.  The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[34]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-Related Desynchronization , 1999 .

[35]  Jeff Stone,et al.  Battling Doubt by Avoiding Practice: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Self-Handicapping in White Athletes , 2002 .

[36]  A. Neubauer,et al.  Two- vs. three-dimensional presentation of mental rotation tasks: Sex differences and effects of training on performance and brain activation , 2010, Intelligence.

[37]  I. Deary,et al.  The neuroscience of human intelligence differences , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Patrick E. Shrout,et al.  Should Significance Tests be Banned? Introduction to a Special Section Exploring the Pros and Cons , 1997 .