Augmented deliberation: Merging physical and virtual interaction to engage communities in urban planning

The goal of this article is two-fold: to introduce the concept of augmented deliberation and to demonstrate its implementation in a pilot project.We look specifically at a project called Hub2. This community engagement project employed the online virtual world Second Life to augment community deliberation in the planning of a neighborhood park in Boston, Massachusetts. The local community was invited to gather in a physical space and a virtual space simultaneously, and a physical moderator and virtual designer orchestrated deliberation.This project demonstrates the design values central to augmented deliberation: (1) it is a multimedia group communication process which balances the specific affordances of digital technologies with the established qualities of face-to-face group deliberation; (2) it emphasizes the power of experience; and (3) it promotes sustainability and reproducibility through digital tracking. Augmented deliberation, when properly designed, provides a powerful mechanism to enable productive and meaningful public deliberation. The article concludes with directions for further research.

[1]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games , 2008 .

[2]  Kelly L. Beckett,et al.  Augmented by Reality: The Pedagogical Praxis of Urban Planning as a Pathway to Ecological Thinking , 2005 .

[3]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .

[4]  J. Habermas.  The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere , 1962 .

[5]  S. Brody,et al.  Mandating Citizen Participation in Plan Making: Six Strategic Planning Choices , 2003 .

[6]  Paul R. Abramson,et al.  Political attitudes in America: Formation and change , 1983 .

[7]  Ruth Wodak,et al.  The European Union in cyberspace , 2007 .

[8]  Elihu Katz,et al.  News, Talk, Opinion, Participation: The Part Played by Conversation in Deliberative Democracy , 1999 .

[9]  Tali Mendelberg.  THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE , 2009 .

[10]  David Schultz,et al.  Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot be Avoided in Politics, and What Should be Done About It , 2002 .

[11]  S. Albrecht.  Whose voice is heard in online deliberation?: A study of participation and representation in political debates on the internet , 2006 .

[12]  Clay Shirky.  Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations , 2008 .

[13]  John Gastil,et al.  By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy Through Deliberative Elections , 2000 .

[14]  Francoise Brun-Cottan,et al.  Using video to re-present the user , 1995, CACM.

[15]  D. Ryfe.  Narrative and Deliberation in Small Group Forums , 2006 .

[16]  David R. Godschalk,et al.  A Collaborative Approach to Planning Through Urban Activities , 1966 .

[17]  Seong-Jae Min,et al.  Online vs. Face-to-Face Deliberation: Effects on Civic Engagement , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[18]  Ruth Wodak,et al.  The European Union in Cyberspace: Democratic Participation via Online Multilingual Discussion Boards , 2007 .

[19]  J. Cappella,et al.  Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion? , 2002 .

[20]  Scott D. McClurg,et al.  The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk: Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation , 2006 .

[21]  Jock Given,et al.  The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom , 2007, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[22]  R. Kies,et al.  Online Forums and Deliberative Democracy , 2005 .

[23]  P. Healey.  The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation , 1996 .

[24]  O. Devisch,et al.  Should Planners Start Playing Computer Games? Arguments from SimCity and Second Life , 2008 .

[25]  John Gastil,et al.  Increasing Political Sophistication Through Public Deliberation , 1999 .

[26]  William Wresch,et al.  Democracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace , 2001, Inf. Soc..

[27]  M. D. Carpini,et al.  Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature , 2004 .

[28]  Richard Levy.  Visualization of Urban Alternatives , 1995 .

[29]  John Gastil,et al.  A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups , 2002 .

[30]  Noelle McAfee.  Three Models of Democratic Deliberation , 2004 .

[31]  Scott Wright,et al.  Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums , 2007, New Media Soc..

[32]  Stewart Burn,et al.  Visualisation Techniques For Facilitating Stakeholder Decision Making In Urban Planning , 2008, J. Community Informatics.

[33]  Robert M. Entman,et al.  Mediated Politics: Reframing Public Opinion as We Have Known It , 2000 .

[34]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[35]  T. Benson.  Rhetoric, civility, and community: Political debate on computer bulletin boards , 1996 .

[36]  Charles R. Nesson,et al.  The Case for Education in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[37]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Using ethnography in contextural design , 1997, CACM.

[38]  C. Sunstein.  Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge , 2006 .

[39]  P. Clavel.  The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969-1984 , 1986 .

[40]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[41]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley,et al.  Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet: Users' Perspectives , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[42]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Information Technology in Support of Public Deliberation , 2005 .

[43]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[44]  Eric Gordon,et al.  Placeworlds: Using Virtual Worlds to Foster Civic Engagement , 2008 .

[45]  T. Grodal,et al.  Embodiment and Interface , 2008 .

[46]  Edmund M. Burke.  A participatory approach to urban planning , 1979 .

[47]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations , 1964 .

[48]  D. Ryfe.  DOES DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY WORK , 2005 .

[49]  Zizi Papacharissi,et al.  Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups , 2004, New Media Soc..

[50]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  On Location Learning: Authentic Applied Science with Networked Augmented Realities , 2007 .

[51]  D. Rucinski.  The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. , 1994 .

[52]  Lincoln Dahlberg,et al.  Extending the Public Sphere Through Cyberspace: The Case of Minnesota E-Democracy , 2001, First Monday.

[53]  J. Willis.  The voice of the people. , 1998, Nursing times.

[54]  Ann Brady,et al.  Rhetorical Research: Toward a User-Centered Approach , 2004 .

[55]  B. Barber.  Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age , 1985 .

[56]  Claus Rinner,et al.  The use of Web 2.0 concepts to support deliberation in spatial decision-making , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[57]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Fostering Civic Engagement by Building a Virtual City , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[58]  Michael Barnett,et al.  Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture , 2003 .

[59]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Teledemocracy in the province: An experiment with Internet-based software and public debate , 1999 .

[60]  Eric Gordon,et al.  Designing Choreographies for the New Economy of Attention , 2009, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[61]  Claus Rinner,et al.  Argumentation Maps: GIS-Based Discussion Support for On-Line Planning , 2001 .

[62]  Michael Barndt,et al.  Public Participation GIS—Barriers to Implementation , 1998 .

[63]  Jennifer Stromer-Galley.  Measuring Deliberation’s Content: A Coding Scheme , 2007, Regular Issue.

[64]  D. Ryfe,et al.  The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: A Study of 16 Deliberative Organizations , 2002 .

[65]  John Gastil,et al.  Political Communication and Deliberation , 2008 .

[66]  F. Mathews,et al.  Politics for People: Finding a Responsible Public Voice , 1994 .

[67]  Bernard Manin,et al.  On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation , 1987 .

[68]  Pierre Clavel,et al.  Reinventing Cities: Equity Planners Tell Their Stories , 1994 .

[69]  Trevor M. Harris,et al.  GIS and Society: The Social Implications of How People, Space, and Environment Are Represented in GIS- Scientific Report for the Initiative 19 Specialist Meeting (96-7) , 1996 .

[70]  Patsy Healey,et al.  The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. , 2001 .