Development of a device for sampling cattle breath Journal Item

Diagnostic tests for some conditions affecting cattle, such as tuberculosis, are often expensive and required over a prolonged period, so that the diagnostic tests involve more than one visit by a qualified vet. An alternative rapid and non-invasive diagnostic test would be desirable. One possibility is the use of breath testing, which has been shown to have diagnostic potential in humans. The development of a device for taking a representative breath sample from a bovine animal is described. Six devices using different configurations were assessed, over three separate testing days, for their ability to take a representative breath sample which does not cause undue stress to the animal and for the ease of operator use. The main factor affecting the sample integrity was dead space, however temperature also played a role. The best samples causing the least stress to animals were taken using a nostril sampler. The nostril samplers were then used to take breath samples from cattle with and without tuberculosis which were then analysed using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to demonstrate proof-of-principle.

[1]  Olaf Tietje,et al.  Volatile biomarkers of pulmonary tuberculosis in the breath. , 2007, Tuberculosis.

[2]  P. Španěl,et al.  The challenge of breath analysis for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring. , 2007, The Analyst.

[3]  S. Chambers,et al.  The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2008, Tuberculosis.

[4]  A. D. de Roos,et al.  Screening for subclinical ketosis in dairy cattle by Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  Julian W. Gardner,et al.  Preliminary investigation of breath sampling as a monitor of health in dairy cattle , 1997 .

[6]  P. Reinhold,et al.  Evaluation of methodological and biological influences on the collection and composition of exhaled breath condensate , 2006, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[7]  D. J. Marlin,et al.  Use of an Electronic Nose To Diagnose Mycobacterium bovis Infection in Badgers and Cattle , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  R. Martin,et al.  Methane emissions measured directly from grazing livestock in New Zealand , 1997 .

[9]  Arthur Stanley Pease,et al.  Some Remarks on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberculosis in Antiquity , 1940, Isis.

[10]  T. T. Mottram,et al.  An experiment to determine the feasibility of automatically detecting hyperketonaemia in dairy cows , 1999 .

[11]  Evor L. Hines,et al.  Prediction of health of dairy cattle from breath samples using neural network with parametric model of dynamic response of array of semiconducting gas sensors , 1999 .

[12]  P. Barnes,et al.  Biomarkers of some pulmonary diseases in exhaled breath , 2002, Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals.

[13]  David Smith,et al.  Selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS) for on-line trace gas analysis. , 2005, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[14]  Lauren E. Manning,et al.  The scent of Mycobacterium tuberculosis--part II breath. , 2009, Tuberculosis.

[15]  David Smith,et al.  A longitudinal study of ammonia, acetone and propanol in the exhaled breath of 30 subjects using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry, SIFT-MS , 2006, Physiological measurement.