An Early Warning Scoring System to Identify Septic Patients in the Prehospital Setting: The PRESEP Score.

OBJECTIVES The objective was to develop and evaluate an early sepsis detection score for the prehospital setting. METHODS A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who were admitted by emergency medical services (EMS) to the emergency department of the Jena University Hospital was performed. Because potential predictors for sepsis should be based on consensus criteria, the following parameters were extracted from the EMS protocol for further analysis: temperature, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), oxygen saturation (SaO2 ), Glasgow Coma Scale score, blood glucose, and systolic blood pressure (sBP). Potential predictors were stratified based on inspection of Loess graphs. Backward model selection was performed to select risk factors for the final model. The Prehospital Early Sepsis Detection (PRESEP) score was calculated as the sum of simplified regression weights. Its predictive validity was compared to the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), the Robson screening tool, and the BAS 90-30-90. RESULTS A total of 375 patients were included in the derivation sample; 93 (24.8%) of these had sepsis, including 60 patients with severe sepsis and 12 patients with septic shock. Backward model selection identified temperature, HR, RR, SaO2 , and sBP for inclusion in the PRESEP score. Simplified weights were as follows: temperature > 38°C = 4, temperature < 36°C = 1, HR > 90 beats/min = 2, RR > 22 breaths/min = 1, SaO2 < 92% = 2, and sBP < 90 mm Hg = 2. The cutoff value for a possible existing septic disease based on maximum Youden's index was ≥4 (sensitivity 0.85, specificity 0.86, positive predictive value [PPV] 0.66, and negative predictive value [NPV] 0.95). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the PRESEP score was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 0.96) and was larger than the AUC of the MEWS (0.93 vs. 0.77, p < 0.001). The PRESEP score surpassed MEWS and BAS 90-60-90 for sensitivity (0.74 and 0.62, respectively), specificity (0.75 and 0.83), PPV (0.45 and 0.51), and NPV (0.91 and 0.89). The Robson screening tool had a higher sensitivity and NPV (0.95 and 0.97), but its specificity and PPV were lower (0.43 and 0.32). CONCLUSIONS The PRESEP score could be a valuable tool for identifying septic patients in the prehospital setting in the case of suspected infection. It should be prospectively validated.

[1]  Mitchell M. Levy,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock , 2004, Critical care medicine.

[2]  C. Sprung,et al.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock 2012 , 2013, Critical care medicine.

[3]  C. Subbe,et al.  Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions. , 2001, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[4]  W. Robson,et al.  Sepsis: a need for prehospital intervention? , 2009, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[5]  L. Kurland,et al.  Identification of adult septic patients in the prehospital setting: a comparison of two screening tools and clinical judgment , 2014, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[6]  Henry E. Wang,et al.  Opportunities for Emergency Medical Services care of sepsis. , 2010, Resuscitation.

[7]  B. Jennett,et al.  Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. , 1974, Lancet.

[8]  Alan E Jones,et al.  The impact of emergency medical services on the ED care of severe sepsis. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[9]  W. Knaus,et al.  Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. , 1992, Chest.

[10]  M. Levy,et al.  Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Reduces Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock From the First Hour: Results From a Guideline-Based Performance Improvement Program* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[11]  Peter C Austin,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Developing Predictive Models , 2004 .