Disquisitions of Original Antigenic Sin. I. Evidence in man.

When primary immunity is boosted not by the homologous but by a crossreacting vaccine, the newly formed antibodies react better with the primary antigen than with the antigen actually eliciting the response. This phenomenon bears the name of Original Antigenic Sin (1). It is shown that the number of antibody molecules produced against the original and the vaccinating antigen is the same; that each of these molecules is capable of reacting with both antigens; that the activity of an antiserum can be completely absorbed with either antigen; that both residual and adsorbed-dissociated fractions of antibody exhibit the same relative affinities towards the two antigens as did the native serum; that, unlike standard primary and secondary responses, the population of antibody molecules characterizing the Original Antigenic Sin is homogeneous; that each molecule has a lower equilibrium constant (i.e. higher avidity) against the original antigen than against the antigen stimulating the present response; and that all equilibrium constants are typical of secondary antibody. It is concluded that the Original Antigenic Sin is a partial anamnestic response, a related antigen stimulating that sector only of the originally primed cells which is destined to produce cross-reacting antibody. A hypothesis is developed according to which the basic difference between primary and secondary reactivity rests on the presence of a trapping mechanism that allows anamnestic production of antibody against lower doses of the homologous antigen. Such a mechanism is capable of cross-trapping related antigens, thus preventing a standard primary response and allowing manifestations of Original Antigenic Sin.

[1]  F. Karush The Interaction of Purified Antibody with Optically Isomeric Haptens1,2 , 1956 .

[2]  D. Pressman,et al.  Heterogeneity and average combining constants of antibodies from individual rabbits. , 1958, Journal of immunology.

[3]  S. Groth,et al.  The Neutralization of Viruses , 1963 .

[4]  Thomas Francis,et al.  INFLUENZA: THE NEWE ACQUAYANTANCE , 1953 .

[5]  S. Groth,et al.  METHODS IN IMMUNOCHEMISTRY OF VIRUSES: 2. EVALUATION OF PARAMETERS FROM EQUILIBRIUM MEASUREMENTS , 1961 .

[6]  F. Karush The Interaction of Purified Anti-β-lactoside Antibody with Haptens1 , 1957 .

[7]  T. Francis,et al.  A serological recapitulation of human infection with different strains of influenza virus. , 1953, Transactions of the Association of American Physicians.

[8]  F. M. Davenport,et al.  A SEROLOGIC RECAPITULATION OF PAST EXPERIENCES WITH INFLUENZA A; ANTIBODY RESPONSE TO MONOVALENT VACCINE , 1956, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  M. Fishman ANTIBODY FORMATION IN VITRO , 1961, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  T. Aronsson,et al.  Improved separation of serum proteins in paper electrophoresis: a new electrophoresis buffer. , 1957, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[11]  H. Eisen,et al.  Immune Tolerance and an Extracellular Regulatory Role for Bivalent Antibody , 1964, Nature.

[12]  Thomas Francis,et al.  EPIDEMIOLOGIC AND IMMUNOLOGIC SIGNIFICANCE OF AGE DISTRIBUTION OF ANTIBODY TO ANTIGENIC VARIANTS OF INFLUENZA VIRUS , 1953, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  R. Webster,et al.  The Neutralization of Animal Viruses IV. Parameters of the Influenza Virus-Antibody System , 1963 .

[14]  T. Francis,et al.  Studies of antibodies to strains of influenza virus in persons of different ages in sera collected in a postepidemic period. , 1955, Journal of immunology.

[15]  T. Francis,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF INFLUENZA ANTIBODIES BY SERUM ABSORPTION , 1956, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[16]  S. Groth Modification of virus receptors by metaperiodate; the properties of IO4-treated red-cells. , 1949 .

[17]  L. Pauling,et al.  The Serological Properties of Simple Substances. VII. A Quantitative Theory of the Inhibition by Haptens of the Precipitation of Heterogeneous Antisera with Antigens, and Comparison with Experimental Results for Polyhaptenic Simple Substances and for Azoproteins , 1944 .

[18]  N K JERNE,et al.  Immunological speculations. , 1960, Annual review of microbiology.

[19]  T. Francis The current status of the control of influenza. , 1955, Annals of internal medicine.

[20]  D. Pressman,et al.  Heterogeneity of antibody sites in their relative combining affinities for structurally related haptens. , 1958, Journal of immunology.

[21]  R. Webster,et al.  Methods in Immunochemistry of Viruses. 1. Equilibrium Filtration. , 1961 .

[22]  F. L. Adler,et al.  ANTIBODY FORMATION INITIATED IN VITRO , 1963, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[23]  S. Fazekas de St. Groth,et al.  The serology of mumps infections. I. A new source of antigen and a simplified complement fixation test. , 1958, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.