Disentangling the Role of Modularity and Bandwidth in Entry Mode Choice: The Case of Business Services Offshoring

This paper investigates the role of modularity on entry mode choice of companies' offshoring of business services. We distinguish between functional modularity, which reflects the possibility to subdivide a function into smaller modules, and architectural modularity, which reflects the interdependence between these modules. Lower architectural modularity requires greater interaction (greater 'bandwidth') between the organizational units to reintegrate the individual modules. Using modularity appropriately can decrease transaction costs and reduce the risks of knowledge leakages associated with offshoring, and improve the effectiveness of the sourcing process, thus increasing the probability that firms opt for less hierarchical entry modes. Firms that are less experienced with offshoring tend to underestimate the associated resources and costs of architectural modularity and select entry modes that do not provide sufficient bandwidth to efficiently reintegrate offshored modules, increasing the risk of failure of the offshoring initiatives. Our empirical analysis, which involves 490 offshoring initiatives, supports our arguments, especially in high-tech and knowledge-intensive industries.

[1]  Xavier Castañer,et al.  Governance mode vs. governance fit: Performance implications of make-or-ally choices for product innovation in the worldwide aircraft industry, 1942–2000 , 2014 .

[2]  D. Luzzini,et al.  Governance Choice in Global Sourcing of Services: The Impact on Service Quality and Cost Saving Performance , 2014 .

[3]  S. Elia,et al.  The global sourcing of business services: evidence from the offshoring research network survey , 2014 .

[4]  L. Piscitello,et al.  Local Externalities and Ownership Choices in Foreign Acquisitions by Multinational Enterprises , 2014 .

[5]  R. Narula.  Exploring the paradox of competence‐creating subsidiaries : balancing bandwidth and dispersion in MNEs , 2014 .

[6]  Francesco Zirpoli,et al.  Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry , 2013 .

[7]  R. Parente,et al.  STRATEGIC MODULARITY AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF MULTINATIONAL FIRM , 2013 .

[8]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Capabilities, Transaction Costs, and Firm Boundaries , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Teppo Felin,et al.  Organizational Economics of Capability and Heterogeneity , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Torben Pedersen,et al.  Uncovering the Hidden Costs of Offshoring: The Interplay of Complexity, Organizational Design, and Experience , 2012 .

[11]  A. Lewin,et al.  The Global Co-Evolution of Firm Boundaries: Commoditization, Capabilities, and Paths Dependencies , 2012 .

[12]  R. Narula,et al.  Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness , 2011 .

[13]  Dan Braha,et al.  Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology , 2010 .

[14]  M. Reitzig,et al.  The hidden costs of outsourcing: evidence from patent data , 2010 .

[15]  Federica Ceci,et al.  A Matter of Coherence: The Effects of Offshoring of Intangibles on Firm Performance , 2010 .

[16]  Anu Bask,et al.  The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production , 2010 .

[17]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership , 2009 .

[18]  Juliana Hsuan,et al.  Service Architecture and Modularity , 2009, Decis. Sci..

[19]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent , 2009 .

[20]  Mike Wright,et al.  Managing knowledge in foreign entry strategies: a resource-based analysis , 2009 .

[21]  Silvia Massini,et al.  A Dynamic Perspective on Next-Generation Offshoring: The Global Sourcing of Science and Engineering Talent , 2008 .

[22]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base , 2008 .

[23]  DibbernJens,et al.  Explaining Variations in Client Extra Costs Between Software Projects Offshored to India , 2008, MIS Q..

[24]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Resource-Based Advantages in an International Context† , 2008 .

[25]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives , 2007 .

[26]  B. Kedia,et al.  International outsourcing of services: A partnership model , 2007 .

[27]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems , 2006 .

[28]  Y. Bar-Yam,et al.  Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology (Understanding Complex Systems) , 2006 .

[29]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Mergers and acquisitions : their effect on the innovative performance of companies in high-tech industries , 2006 .

[30]  M. Jacobides.  Playing Football on a Soccer Field: Value Chain Structure, Institutional Modularity and Success in Foreign Expansion , 2005 .

[31]  M. Jacobides,et al.  The Dynamic Limits of Specialization: Vertical Integration Reconsidered , 2005 .

[32]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: measures and design methods , 2004 .

[33]  J. Nugent,et al.  Foreign Expansion by Italian Manufacturing Firms in the Nineties: an Ordered Probit Analysis , 2003 .

[34]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  R. Langlois.  Modularity in technology and organization , 2002 .

[36]  Bernard Garrette,et al.  Alliances with Competitors: How to Combine and Protect Key Resources? , 2002 .

[37]  A. Madhok.  Reassessing the fundamentals and beyond: Ronald Coase, the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production , 2002 .

[38]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance , 2002 .

[39]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More than They Make? , 2001 .

[40]  R. Langlois.  The Vanishing Hand: The Changing Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism , 2001 .

[41]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors , 2001, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[42]  R. Narula,et al.  The Eclectic Paradigm in the Global Economy , 2001 .

[43]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[44]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[45]  Harvie Ramsay,et al.  Strategic Technological Partnering by EU Firms , 2001 .

[46]  P. Hertog.  KNOWLEDGE-INTENSIVE BUSINESS SERVICES AS CO-PRODUCERS OF INNOVATION , 2000 .

[47]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[48]  G. Santangelo,et al.  Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm , 2000 .

[49]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Modular Product Design: A Life-Cycle View , 1999, Trans. SDPS.

[50]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[51]  Peter J. O'Grady,et al.  The Age of Modularity : Using the New World of Modular Products to Revolutionize Your Corporation , 1999 .

[52]  R. Narula,et al.  Innovating through strategic alliances: moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements , 1999 .

[53]  Gregory E. Osland,et al.  A transaction cost perspective on foreign market entry strategies of US and Japanese firms , 1998 .

[54]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  Managing in an age of modularity. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[55]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[56]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[57]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[58]  D. Teece.  Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation☆ , 1996 .

[59]  J. Barney.  The Resource-Based Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[60]  I. Miles.  Services in the new industrial economy , 1993 .

[61]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[62]  R. Langlois,et al.  Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries , 1992 .

[63]  G. Hamel.  Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[64]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[65]  C. Hill.  Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory , 1990 .

[66]  G. Pisano.  The R&D Boundaries of the Firm: An Empirical Analysis , 1990 .

[67]  B. Kogut.  Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1988 .

[68]  A. Rugman,et al.  NEW THEORIES OF THE MULTXNATIONAL ENTERPRISE: AN ASSESSMENT OF INTERNALIZATION THEORY , 1986 .

[69]  A. Rugman,et al.  Internalization as a general theory of foreign direct investment: A re-appraisal of the literature , 1980 .

[70]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[71]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[72]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[73]  J. Hennart,et al.  Yes, we really do need more entry mode studies! A commentary on Shaver , 2015 .

[74]  R. Narula,et al.  End-user collaboration for process innovation in services: The role of internal resources , 2014 .

[75]  J. Myles Shaver,et al.  Do we really need more entry mode studies? , 2013 .

[76]  R. Coase.  The economic nature of the firm: The nature of the firm , 2009 .

[77]  Ronaldo Parente,et al.  Antecedents and outcomes of modular production in the Brazilian automobile industry: a grounded theory approach , 2007 .

[78]  Arie Y. Lewin,et al.  Offshoring administrative and technical work: business hype or the onset of fundamental strategic and organizational transformation ? , 2006 .

[79]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[80]  R. Narula,et al.  R&D Collaboration by SMEs: Some Analytical Issues and Evidence , 2002 .

[81]  R. Narula.  Strategic partnering by EU firms: a rejoinder , 2000 .

[82]  A. Madhok.  COST, VALUE AND FOREIGN MARKET ENTRY MODE: THE TRANSACTION AND THE FIRM , 1997 .