Response surface analysis of the effects of pH and dilution rate on Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 in cellulose-fed continuous culture

The ruminal cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 was grown in cellulose-fed continuous culture with 20 different combinations of pH and dilution rate (D); the combinations were selected according to the physiological pH range of the organism (6.0 to 7.1) and growth rate of the organism on cellulose (0.017 to 0.10 h-1). A response surface analysis was used to characterize the effects of pH and D on the extent of cellulose consumption, growth yield, soluble sugar concentration, and yields of fermentation products. The response surfaces indicate that pH and D coordinately affect cellulose digestion and growth yield in this organism. As expected, the net cellulose consumption increased with increasing D while the fraction of added cellulose that was utilized decreased with increasing D. The effect of changes in pH within the physiological range on cellulose consumption was smaller than that of changes in D. Cellulose degradation was less sensitive to low pH than to high pH. At low Ds (longer retention times), cellulose degradation did not follow first-order kinetics. This decreased rate of cellulose digestion was not due to poor mixing, limitation by other medium components, or preferential utilization of the more amorphous fraction of the cellulose. The cell yield increased from 0.13 to 0.18 mg of cells per mg of cellulose with increasing Ds from 0.02 to 0.06 h-1 and decreased when the pH was shifted from the optimum of 6.5 to 6.8. The effect of pH on cell yield increased with increasing D. The reduced cell yield at low pH appears to be due to both an increase in maintenance energy requirements and a decrease in true growth yield.

[1]  P. Weimer,et al.  Relationship between the fine structure of native cellulose and cellulose degradability by the cellulase complexes of Trichoderma reesei and Clostridium thermocellum , 1985, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[2]  K. Ogimoto,et al.  Atlas of rumen microbiology. , 1981 .

[3]  M. Latham,et al.  Production of Enzymes Degrading Plant Cell Walls and Fermentation of Cellobiose by Ruminococcus flavefaciens in Batch and Continuous Culture , 1979 .

[4]  M. P. Bryant,et al.  Glucose Fermentation Products of Ruminococcus albus Grown in Continuous Culture with Vibrio succinogenes: Changes Caused by Interspecies Transfer of H2 , 1973, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  D. Walker,et al.  Succinic Acid Production by Rumen Bacteria. III. Enzymic Studies on the Formation of Succinate by Ruminococcus Flavefaciens , 1969 .

[6]  H. M. Cunningham,et al.  Effect of adding buffers to all concentrate rations on feedlot performance of steers, ration digestibility and intra-rumen environment. , 1963 .

[7]  B. A. Dehority,et al.  Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  R. L. Baldwin,et al.  Substrate Preferences in Rumen Bacteria: Evidence of Catabolite Regulatory Mechanisms , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[9]  W. V. Thayne,et al.  Fermentation of a High Concentrate Diet as Affected by Ruminal pH and Digesta Flow , 1986 .

[10]  G. Varga,et al.  Effects of Solids and Liquid Flows on Fermentation in Continuous Cultures. IV. pH and Dilution Rate , 1984 .

[11]  B. White,et al.  Cellobiose uptake and metabolism by Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 1991, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  Y. Ruckebusch,et al.  Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants , 1980, Springer Netherlands.

[13]  P. Weimer,et al.  Effect of cellulose fine structure on kinetics of its digestion by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  T. Klopfenstein,et al.  Adaptation to High Concentrate Diets by Beef Cattle. II. Effect of Ruminal pH Alteration on Rumen Ferementation and Voluntary Intake of Wheat Diets1 , 1979 .

[15]  R. Estell,et al.  Relationship of rumen fluid dilution rate to rumen fermentation and dietary characteristics of beef steers. , 1985, Journal of animal science.

[16]  J. Costerton,et al.  Atlas of Rumen Microbiology , 1983 .

[17]  C. Stewart Factors Affecting the Cellulolytic Activity of Rumen Contents , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  H. R. Isaacson,et al.  Efficiency of energy utilization by mixed rumen bacteria in continuous culture. , 1975, Journal of dairy science.

[19]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[20]  G. L. Miller,et al.  Measurement of carboxymethylcellulase activity , 1960 .

[21]  L. P. Milligan,et al.  Effects of cold exposure on digestion, microbial synthesis and nitrogen transformations in sheep , 1978, British Journal of Nutrition.

[22]  H. M. Schwartz,et al.  Influence of Supplementation of Corn Stover with Corn Grain on the Fibrolytic Bacteria in the Rumen of Sheep and Their Relation to the Intake and Digestion of Fiber , 1984 .

[23]  B. A. Dehority,et al.  Vitamin Requirements of Several Cellulolytic Rumen Bacteria , 1965, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  A. Kistner,et al.  A small-scale, three-vessel, continuous culture system for quantitative studies of plant fibre degradation by anaerobic bacteria. , 1990 .

[25]  S. Pavlostathis,et al.  Fermentation of Insoluble Cellulose by Continuous Cultures of Ruminococcus albus , 1988, Applied and environmental microbiology.