Computational design of protein-protein interactions.

A long-term aim of computational design is to generate specific protein-protein interactions at desired affinity, specificity, and kinetics. The past three years have seen the first reports on atomically accurate de novo interactions. These were based on advances in design algorithms and the ability to harness high-throughput experimental characterization of design variants to optimize binding. Current state-of-the-art in computational design lacks precision, and therefore requires intensive experimental optimization to achieve parity with natural binders. Recent successes (and failures) point the way to future progress in design methodology that would enable routine and robust design of binders and inhibitors, while also shedding light on the essential features of biomolecular recognition.

[1]  David Baker,et al.  Hotspot-centric de novo design of protein binders. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  Thomas Szyperski,et al.  Computational design of a PAK1 binding protein. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimizing electrostatic affinity in ligand-receptor binding: Theory, computation, and ligand properties , 1998 .

[4]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A comparison of successful and failed protein interface designs highlights the challenges of designing buried hydrogen bonds , 2013, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Affinity maturation of a computationally designed binding protein affords a functional but disordered polypeptide. , 2014, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  W. DeGrado,et al.  From synthetic coiled coils to functional proteins: automated design of a receptor for the calmodulin-binding domain of calcineurin. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  W. Goddard,et al.  Molecular basis for the interplay of apoptosis and proliferation mediated by Bcl-xL:Bim interactions in pancreatic cancer cells. , 2012, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  David Baker,et al.  Ca2+ indicators based on computationally redesigned calmodulin-peptide pairs. , 2006, Chemistry & biology.

[9]  Marianne Rooman,et al.  BeAtMuSiC: prediction of changes in protein–protein binding affinity on mutations , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Transfer of engineered biophysical properties between different antibody formats and expression systems. , 2012, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[11]  David Baker,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction Using Rosetta , 2004, Numerical Computer Methods, Part D.

[12]  Gregory A Caputo,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Computational Design of Peptides That Target Transmembrane Helices , 2007 .

[13]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of High-Affinity Epitope Scaffolds by Backbone Grafting of a Linear Epitope , 2011, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[15]  Chen Zeng,et al.  An improved pairwise decomposable finite‐difference Poisson–Boltzmann method for computational protein design , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Computational design of a symmetric homodimer using β-strand assembly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  Structure-based protocol for identifying mutations that enhance protein-protein binding affinities. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  Amy E Keating,et al.  Predictive Bcl-2 family binding models rooted in experiment or structure. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side-chain prediction. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  M. Kosloff,et al.  Integrating energy calculations with functional assays to decipher the specificity of G-protein inactivation by RGS proteins , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[22]  D. Baker,et al.  Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.

[23]  P. Harbury,et al.  Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[24]  Huan-Xiang Zhou,et al.  Rationalizing 5000-fold differences in receptor-binding rate constants of four cytokines. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Protein binding specificity versus promiscuity. , 2010, Current opinion in structural biology.

[26]  L L Looger,et al.  Computational design of a Zn2+ receptor that controls bacterial gene expression , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Trading accuracy for speed: A quantitative comparison of search algorithms in protein sequence design. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. , 1997, Science.

[29]  L. Looger,et al.  Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.

[30]  Z. Weng,et al.  Molecular basis of a million-fold affinity maturation process in a protein-protein interaction. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  What makes a protein fold amenable to functional innovation? Fold polarity and stability trade-offs. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  Iain H. Moal,et al.  Kinetic Rate Constant Prediction Supports the Conformational Selection Mechanism of Protein Binding , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Enzyme-like proteins by computational design , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Z. Weng,et al.  A structure‐based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinity , 2011, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[36]  A. Plückthun,et al.  Development of a generic adenovirus delivery system based on structure-guided design of bispecific trimeric DARPin adapters , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins , 1995, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  D. Baker,et al.  An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  F. Arnold,et al.  Protein stability promotes evolvability. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  A. Keating,et al.  Structure-based redesign of the binding specificity of anti-apoptotic Bcl-x(L). , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  D. Baker,et al.  Computation-Guided Backbone Grafting of a Discontinuous Motif onto a Protein Scaffold , 2011, Science.

[42]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[43]  D. Baker,et al.  Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  F. J. Luque,et al.  Shielded hydrogen bonds as structural determinants of binding kinetics: application in drug design. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[45]  J R Desjarlais,et al.  Computational protein design. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[46]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  New insights into the mechanism of protein–protein association , 2001, Proteins.

[47]  Brian Kuhlman,et al.  Structure-based design of supercharged, highly thermoresistant antibodies. , 2012, Chemistry & biology.

[48]  Alessandro Senes,et al.  E(z), a depth-dependent potential for assessing the energies of insertion of amino acid side-chains into membranes: derivation and applications to determining the orientation of transmembrane and interfacial helices. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[49]  G Schreiber,et al.  Energetics of protein-protein interactions: analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  S. L. Mayo,et al.  Computational protein design. , 1999, Structure.

[51]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Rational design of new binding specificity by simultaneous mutagenesis of calmodulin and a target peptide. , 2006, Biochemistry.

[52]  Eyal Akiva,et al.  Prediction of Mutational Tolerance in HIV-1 Protease and Reverse Transcriptase Using Flexible Backbone Protein Design , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[53]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Affinity enhancement of an in vivo matured therapeutic antibody using structure‐based computational design , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[54]  O. Schueler‐Furman,et al.  Progress in protein–protein docking: Atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side‐chain flexibility , 2005, Proteins.

[55]  Kimberly A. Reynolds,et al.  An object‐oriented library for computational protein design , 2007, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  Luis Serrano,et al.  Rational design of a GCN4-derived mimetic of interleukin-4 , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[57]  V. Rybin,et al.  Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[58]  Jae Young Lee,et al.  Crystal structure and functional analysis of the SurE protein identify a novel phosphatase family , 2001, Nature Structural Biology.

[59]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  B. Stoddard,et al.  Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[61]  T. Baker,et al.  Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Wen-Lian Hsu,et al.  Rationalization and Design of the Complementarity Determining Region Sequences in an Antibody-Antigen Recognition Interface , 2012, PloS one.

[63]  G Schreiber,et al.  Electrostatically optimized Ras-binding Ral guanine dissociation stimulator mutants increase the rate of association by stabilizing the encounter complex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design , 2008, Nature.

[65]  Stephen L. Mayo,et al.  Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[66]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Computational design of calmodulin mutants with up to 900-fold increase in binding specificity. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[67]  G Schreiber,et al.  Predicting the rate enhancement of protein complex formation from the electrostatic energy of interaction. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[68]  Po-Ssu Huang,et al.  Adaptation of a fast Fourier transform‐based docking algorithm for protein design , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[69]  David Baker,et al.  Rational Design of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Variants for Antagonizing Integrin Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1-dependent Adhesion* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[70]  K. Sharp,et al.  Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: Method and error assessment , 1988 .

[71]  S. A. Marshall,et al.  Energy functions for protein design. , 1999, Current opinion in structural biology.

[72]  James R. Apgar,et al.  Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[73]  David Baker,et al.  PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 58:893–904 (2005) A “Solvated Rotamer ” Approach to Modeling Water- Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2022 .

[74]  David Baker,et al.  A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution. , 2011, Molecular cell.

[75]  Stephen L Mayo,et al.  A de novo designed protein–protein interface , 2007, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[76]  Eric A. Althoff,et al.  De Novo Computational Design of Retro-Aldol Enzymes , 2008, Science.

[77]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  Fundamental aspects of protein-protein association kinetics. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[78]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Community-wide assessment of protein-interface modeling suggests improvements to design methodology. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[79]  Bryan S. Der,et al.  Metal-mediated affinity and orientation specificity in a computationally designed protein homodimer. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[80]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Control of protein signaling using a computationally designed GTPase/GEF orthogonal pair , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[81]  M. Peterson,et al.  Combining different design strategies for rational affinity maturation of the MICA‐NKG2D interface , 2012, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[82]  David Baker,et al.  Role of the Biomolecular Energy Gap in Protein Design, Structure, and Evolution , 2012, Cell.

[83]  Sarel J Fleishman,et al.  Emerging themes in the computational design of novel enzymes and protein–protein interfaces , 2013, FEBS letters.

[84]  V Potapov,et al.  Computational redesign of a protein-protein interface for high affinity and binding specificity using modular architecture and naturally occurring template fragments. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[85]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Optimization of electrostatic binding free energy , 1997 .

[86]  Julie C. Mitchell,et al.  Community‐wide evaluation of methods for predicting the effect of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2013, Proteins.

[87]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a protein-based enzyme inhibitor. , 2013, Journal of molecular biology.

[88]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou,et al.  A method for computing association rate constants of atomistically represented proteins under macromolecular crowding , 2012, Physical biology.

[89]  Liang Tong,et al.  Computational design of catalytic dyads and oxyanion holes for ester hydrolysis. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[90]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Rational design of faster associating and tighter binding protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[91]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational Design of Self-Assembling Protein Nanomaterials with Atomic Level Accuracy , 2012, Science.

[92]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Nonnatural protein–protein interaction-pair design by key residues grafting , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[93]  Julia M. Shifman,et al.  Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[94]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Optimization of affinity, specificity and function of designed influenza inhibitors using deep sequencing , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[95]  Junichi Takagi,et al.  Computational design of an integrin I domain stabilized in the open high affinity conformation , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[96]  Jonathan S Marvin,et al.  Redesigning an antibody fragment for faster association with its antigen. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[97]  G. Schreiber,et al.  Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[98]  Bruce Tidor,et al.  Computational design of antibody-affinity improvement beyond in vivo maturation , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[99]  Timothy A. Whitehead,et al.  Computational Design of Proteins Targeting the Conserved Stem Region of Influenza Hemagglutinin , 2011, Science.

[100]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  On the contribution of water-mediated interactions to protein-complex stability. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[101]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational design of a new hydrogen bond network and at least a 300-fold specificity switch at a protein-protein interface. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[102]  Nir Ben-Tal,et al.  Protein stability: a single recorded mutation aids in predicting the effects of other mutations in the same amino acid site , 2011, Bioinform..

[103]  David Baker,et al.  Computational design of novel protein binders and experimental affinity maturation. , 2013, Methods in enzymology.