Prompting students’ context-generating cognitive activity in ill-structured domains: does the prompting mode affect learning?

This study was designed to investigate the impact of question prompts that guide students to focus on context-related issues when learning through cases in an ill-structured domain. Three groups of undergraduate students studied cases during a lab-session time period using a web-based environment. The first group studied without any question prompts. The second group studied the same material while prompted to provide written answers to embedded questions in the cases. The third group studied while having only to think of possible answers for the question prompts. In this study, we explored how the questioning intervention affected students’ conceptual knowledge of the domain and their problem-solving ability. Post-tests did not reveal significant statistical differences in the groups’ performance, indicating that under specific study conditions the prompting impact is not traceable in the learning outcomes. This result, however, is discussed in the light of a previous study, which showed that this context-oriented prompting method had a beneficial effect on student learning in a prolonged study-time setting, where students were able to self-regulate their study activity.

[1]  Arthur N. Applebee.  Writing and Reasoning , 1984 .

[2]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Teachability of Reflective Processes in Written Composition , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[4]  Timothy A. Post,et al.  On the solving of ill-structured problems. , 1988 .

[5]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Acquisition of Confusing Facts. , 1988 .

[6]  Robert L. Greene,et al.  Spacing effects in memory: evidence for a two-process account , 1989 .

[7]  J. Sinnott.  A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. , 1989 .

[8]  J. Sinnott.  Everyday Problem Solving: Theory and Applications , 1989 .

[9]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Adult Learning of Factual Paragraphs , 1990 .

[10]  Ruth Garner,et al.  When Children and Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward a Theory of Settings , 1990 .

[11]  A. King.  Effects of training in strategic questioning on children's problem-solving performance , 1991 .

[12]  A. King.  Facilitating Elaborative Learning Through Guided Student-Generated Questioning , 1992 .

[13]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Elaborative-interrogation and prior-knowledge effects on learning of facts , 1992 .

[14]  J. Ackerman,et al.  The Promise of Writing to Learn , 1993 .

[15]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[16]  L. Rivard,et al.  A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research , 1994 .

[17]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[18]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[19]  B. Rosenshine,et al.  Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies , 1996 .

[20]  Mark A. McDaniel,et al.  Learning With Analogy and Elaborative Interrogation , 1996 .

[21]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[22]  Päivi Tynjälä,et al.  Writing as a tool for constructive learning: Students' learning experiences during an experiment , 1998 .

[23]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[24]  Boicho N. Kokinov,et al.  Dynamics and Automaticity of Context: A Cognitive Modeling Approach , 1999, CONTEXT.

[25]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Contextualized questioning to scaffold learning from simulations , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Perry D. Klein.  Reopening Inquiry into Cognitive Processes in Writing-To-Learn , 1999 .

[27]  Jacques Verville,et al.  Acquiring Enterprise Software: Beating the Vendors at Their Own Game , 2000 .

[28]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[29]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A Qualitative Analysis of Scaffolding Use in a Resource-Based Learning Environment Involving the World Wide Web , 2000 .

[30]  T. Toppino,et al.  The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: Present and accounted for , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[31]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .

[32]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .

[33]  Kweku Ewusi-Mensah,et al.  Software Development Failures , 2003 .

[34]  Perry D. Klein,et al.  Constructing Scientific Explanations Through Writing , 2004 .

[35]  Erling S. Andersen.  Successful IT Project Delivery: Learning the Lessons of Project Failure: David Yardley. Addison Wesley, London, 2002, 346 pp. ISNB:0-201-75606-4. Price: £29.99, paperback , 2004 .

[36]  R. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[37]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[38]  Susan M. Land,et al.  A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions , 2004 .

[39]  Pearl Brereton,et al.  An investigation of software engineering curricula , 2005, J. Syst. Softw..

[40]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[41]  Tonya L. Smith-Jackson,et al.  Journal of Information Technology Education Web-based Learning Environment: a Theory-based Design Process for Development and Evaluation Web-based Learning Environment Background Overview of Gps Education , 2022 .

[42]  Sunyoung Joung,et al.  Scaffolding collaborative argumentation in asynchronous discussions with message constraints and message labels , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Ian J Quitadamo,et al.  Learning to improve: using writing to increase critical thinking performance in general education biology. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[44]  Matthias Nückles,et al.  Short-term versus long-term effects of cognitive and metacognitive prompts in writing-to-learn , 2008, ICLS.

[45]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[46]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool , 2008 .