论文信息 - Reflections on paradigms in action in accounting research

Reflections on paradigms in action in accounting research

Abstract This paper starts by shortly summarizing some of the pros and cons of paradigms. It then provides three personal accounts on paradigms at work. The purpose is to challenge the management accounting academy to think how “healthy” its current condition is, if these experiences represent reality for those trying to do something they find valuable and believe in, but does not fit to the thinking models of the established paradigms.

Teemu Malmi | T. Malmi

[1] P. Quattrone. ‘We have never been Post-modern’: On the Search of Management Accounting Theory , 2009 .

[2] Joan L. Luft,et al. Zimmerman's contentious conjectures: describing the present and prescribing the future of empirical management accounting research , 2002 .

[3] Teemu Malmi,et al. A collaborative approach for managing project cost of poor quality , 2004 .

[4] J. Zimmerman,et al. Conjectures Regarding Empirical Managerial Accounting Research , 2001 .

[5] David F. Larcker,et al. Empirical managerial accounting research: are we just describing management consulting practice? , 2002 .

[6] K. Lukka,et al. The constructive approach in management accounting research , 1993 .

[7] K. Weick,et al. Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[8] A. Hopwood. 'If only there were simple solutions, but there aren't': some reflections on Zimmerman's critique of empirical management accounting research , 2002 .

[9] Jan Mouritsen,et al. Homogeneity or heterogeneity of research in management accounting? , 2002 .

[10] Teemu Malmi,et al. In Search of Management Accounting Theory , 2009 .