A straightforward method for tuning of Lyapunov-based controllers in semi-active vibration control applications

Abstract Lyapunov-based control is an attractive strategy for semi-active vibration control as it has a mathematical basis ensuring stability in the sense of Lyapunov and great flexibility in the design. Unfortunately, that flexibility complicates the controller tuning since it involves the construction of a weighting matrix, which is usually done by trial-and-error. In this work, a straightforward (closed form) method to construct such a matrix is proposed. The proposed method is based on penalizing vibrational modes according to their contributions to the response in the uncontrolled case. For this purpose, a new concept of Generalized Modal Contribution Factor is developed. This takes into account the following: spatial distribution of the excitation, knowledge of the frequency content of the excitation, and control objective. The capability of the proposed tuning method is demonstrated through a numerical example.

[1]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Semiactive Control Strategies for MR Dampers: Comparative Study , 2000 .

[2]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Finite Frequency $H_{\infty }$ Control for Vehicle Active Suspension Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[3]  D. J. Ewins,et al.  Modal Testing: Theory and Practice , 1984 .

[4]  Enrique de la Fuente,et al.  An efficient procedure to obtain exact solutions in random vibration analysis of linear structures , 2008 .

[5]  Cristiano Spelta,et al.  Experimental analysis of a motorcycle semi-active rear suspension , 2010 .

[6]  Haiping Du,et al.  Mixed H2/H∞ control of tall buildings with reduced‐order modelling technique , 2008 .

[7]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Effective linear damping and stiffness coefficients of nonlinear systems for design spectrum based analysis , 2010 .

[8]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Genetic algorithm tuning of Lyapunov-based controllers: an application to a single-link flexible robot system , 1996, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[9]  Dean Karnopp,et al.  Vibration Control Using Semi-Active Force Generators , 1974 .

[10]  Wael A. Hashlamoun,et al.  New Results on Modal Participation Factors: Revealing a Previously Unknown Dichotomy , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[12]  Paulin Buaka Muanke,et al.  Determination of normal force for optimal energy dissipation of harmonic disturbance in a semi-active device , 2008 .

[13]  Paulin Buaka Muanke,et al.  Nonlinear phase shift control of semi-active friction devices for optimal energy dissipation , 2009 .

[14]  H. L. Stalford,et al.  Stability of a Lyapunov Controller for a Semi-active Structural Control System with Nonlinear Actuator Dynamics , 2000 .

[15]  C. A. Desoer,et al.  Nonlinear Systems Analysis , 1978 .

[16]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Finite Frequency H∞ Control for Vehicle Active Suspension Systems , 2011 .

[17]  Francesco Marazzi,et al.  Technology of Semiactive Devices and Applications in Vibration Mitigation , 2006 .

[18]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[19]  Pierre E. Dupont,et al.  Semi-active control of friction dampers , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.