Impact of Model Shape Mismatch on Reconstruction Quality in Electrical Impedance Tomography

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a low-cost, noninvasive and radiation free medical imaging modality for monitoring ventilation distribution in the lung. Although such information could be invaluable in preventing ventilator-induced lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients, clinical application of EIT is hindered by difficulties in interpreting the resulting images. One source of this difficulty is the frequent use of simple shapes which do not correspond to the anatomy to reconstruct EIT images. The mismatch between the true body shape and the one used for reconstruction is known to introduce errors, which to date have not been properly characterized. In the present study we, therefore, seek to 1) characterize and quantify the errors resulting from a reconstruction shape mismatch for a number of popular EIT reconstruction algorithms and 2) develop recommendations on the tolerated amount of mismatch for each algorithm. Using real and simulated data, we analyze the performance of four EIT reconstruction algorithms under different degrees of shape mismatch. Results suggest that while slight shape mismatch is well tolerated by all algorithms, using a circular shape severely degrades their performance.

[1]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Tikhonov regularization and prior information in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  GREIT: a unified approach to 2D linear EIT reconstruction of lung images , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[3]  William R B Lionheart Boundary shape and electrical impedance tomography , 1998 .

[4]  A. Adler,et al.  Reconstruction of conductivity changes and electrode movements based on EIT temporal sequences , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[5]  I Frerichs,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography compared to positron emission tomography for the measurement of regional lung ventilation: an experimental study , 2009, Critical care.

[6]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  Uses and abuses of EIDORS: an extensible software base for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[7]  Andy Adler,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography: regularized imaging and contrast detection , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  David Isaacson,et al.  NOSER: An algorithm for solving the inverse conductivity problem , 1990, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[9]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  William R B Lionheart Uniqueness, Shape, and Dimension in EIT , 1999 .

[11]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  The importance of shape : thorax models for GREIT , 2011 .

[12]  Joachim Schöberl,et al.  NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules , 1997 .

[13]  B H Brown,et al.  Errors in reconstruction of resistivity images using a linear reconstruction technique. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[14]  Tadakuni Murai,et al.  Electrical Impedance Computed Tomography Based on a Finite Element Model , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  A Adler,et al.  Objective selection of hyperparameter for EIT , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[16]  A. Adler,et al.  Impedance imaging of lung ventilation: do we need to account for chest expansion? , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  A Tizzard,et al.  Development of a neonate lung reconstruction algorithm using a wavelet AMG and estimated boundary form , 2008, Physiological measurement.

[18]  O. Hoekstra,et al.  Ventilation and perfusion imaging by electrical impedance tomography: a comparison with radionuclide scanning. , 1998, Physiological measurement.

[19]  Harki Tanaka,et al.  Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. , 2004, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  Gerhard Hellige,et al.  Detection of local lung air content by electrical impedance tomography compared with electron beam CT. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.