Philosophical expertise under the microscope
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Jackson. Mind and Illusion , 2003, Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement.
[2] F. Cushman,et al. Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers , 2012 .
[3] Mark H. Lee,et al. The problem of perception , 1989 .
[4] Mary Hare,et al. Activating event knowledge , 2009, Cognition.
[5] R. Giora. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language , 2003 .
[6] S. Liao,et al. Putting the trolley in order: Experimental philosophy and the loop case , 2012 .
[7] T. Williamson. PHILOSOPHICAL EXPERTISE AND THE BURDEN OF PROOF , 2011 .
[8] Regina A. Rini. How not to test for philosophical expertise , 2014, Synthese.
[9] J. Altham. Naming and necessity. , 1981 .
[10] Jennifer Nagel. The Psychological Basis of the Harman-Vogel Paradox , 2011 .
[11] F. Cushman,et al. Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection , 2015, Cognition.
[12] Joshua Alexander,et al. Salience and Epistemic Egocentrism: An Empirical Study , 2014 .
[13] Max Deutsch. The Myth of the Intuitive , 2017 .
[14] Andrew Arana,et al. Purity of Methods , 2011 .
[15] Cameron Buckner,et al. Are philosophers expert intuiters? , 2010 .
[16] P. Engelhardt,et al. Diagnostic Experimental Philosophy , 2017 .
[17] H. Cappelen,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology , 2016 .
[18] A. Baz. Ordinary Language Philosophy , 2016 .
[19] Joshua Alexander,et al. Restrictionism and Reflection: Challenge Deflected, or Simply Redirected? , 2012 .
[20] Joshua D. Greene. Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics , 2015 .
[21] P. Engelhardt,et al. Stereotypical Inferences: Philosophical Relevance and Psycholinguistic Toolkit , 2017 .
[22] Jennifer Nagel,et al. The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions , 2014 .
[23] Wesley Buckwalter,et al. The Epistemic Side-Effect Effect , 2010 .
[24] Saul A. Kripke,et al. Naming and Necessity , 1980 .
[25] Fedor Girenok,et al. On Philosophy: On Philosophy , 2013 .
[26] Nat Hansen. Must we measure what we mean? , 2017 .
[27] Jennifer Nado. Why Intuition? , 2012 .
[28] D. Parfit. Reasons and Persons , 1986 .
[29] K. Ludwig. The Epistemology of Thought Experiments: First Person versus Third Person Approaches , 2007 .
[30] K. McRae,et al. Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .
[31] B. Russell,et al. Problems Of Philosophy , 2004, Synthese.
[32] S. Stich,et al. Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts? , 2013 .
[33] T. Gendler. Intuition, Imagination, and Philosophical Methodology , 2011 .
[34] A. Kauppinen. THE RISE AND FALL OF EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY , 2007 .
[35] J. H. Neely. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .
[36] Aurélie Herbelot,et al. Intuitions and illusions: From explanation and experiment to assessment , 2015 .
[37] Jennifer Nado. The intuition deniers , 2016 .
[38] Nat Hansen. Contemporary Ordinary Language Philosophy , 2014 .
[39] H. Dingle,et al. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge , 1941, Nature.
[40] S. Cohen. Contextualism, skepticism, and the structure of reasons , 1999 .
[41] J. Atlas,et al. It-clefts, informativeness and logical form: Radical pragmatics (revised standard version) , 1981 .
[42] Jennifer Nado. Philosophical expertise and scientific expertise , 2015 .
[43] Jennifer Nagel,et al. Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of thinking about Error , 2010 .
[44] Keith DeRose. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions , 1992 .
[45] Joshua Knobe,et al. Thought experiments. , 2011, Scientific American.
[46] Brian Smart. How to reidentify the ship of Theseus , 1972 .
[47] Mikkel Gerken,et al. Knowledge in and out of contrast , 2016 .
[48] Gillian Romney,et al. SENSE AND SENSIBILIA , 1962 .
[49] H. Cappelen. Philosophy Without Intuitions , 2012 .
[50] Jennifer Nagel. Mindreading in Gettier Cases and Skeptical Pressure Cases , 2012 .
[51] Todd R. Ferretti,et al. Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .
[52] Moti Mizrahi. Three Arguments Against the Expertise Defense , 2015 .
[53] Eugen Fischer. Philosophical intuitions, heuristics, and metaphors , 2013, Synthese.
[54] Joshua D. Greene. Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)Science Matters for Ethics* , 2014, Ethics.
[55] Jennifer Nagel,et al. Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology , 2012 .
[56] E. J. Lowe. On the Identity of Artifacts , 1983 .
[57] Eong Jinkyu,et al. What is the Trolley Problem , 2015 .
[58] Robert Nozick,et al. Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice , 1969 .
[59] J. Knobe. Experimental Philosophy Is Cognitive Science , 2016 .
[60] A. Baier,et al. Reasons and Persons , 1984 .
[61] Joshua Alexander,et al. Framing how we think about disagreement , 2018 .
[62] P. Engelhardt,et al. Intuitions’ linguistic sources:Stereotypes, intuitions, and illusions , 2016 .
[63] D. D. Kim. The Ship of Theseus. , 2018, JAMA.
[64] E. Chemla,et al. Linguistic experiments and ordinary language philosophy , 2015 .