Well-ordered porous conductive polypyrrole as a new platform for neural interfaces.

We present the preparation of electrically conductive, porous polypyrrole surfaces and demonstrate their use as an interactive substrate for neuronal growth. Nerve growth factor (NGF)-loaded porous conducting polymers were initially prepared by electrochemical deposition of a mixture of pyrrole monomers and NGF into two- or three-dimensional particle arrays followed by subsequent removal of a sacrificial template. Morphological observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed these to possess high regularity and porosity with well-defined topographical features. A four-point probe study demonstrated remarkable electrical activities despite the presence of voids. In addition, we investigated the effects of these surfaces on cellular behaviors using PC 12 cells in the presence and absence of electrical stimulation. Our results suggest that the surface topography as well as an applied electrical field can play a crucial role in determining further cell responses. Indeed, surface-induced preferential regulation leads to enhanced cellular viability and neurite extension. Establishing the underlying cellular mechanisms in response to various external stimuli is essential in that one can elicit positive neuronal guidance and modulate their activities by engineering a series of electrical, chemical, and topographical cues.

[1]  N. Kotov,et al.  Inverted colloidal crystals as three-dimensional cell scaffolds. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  Randall J. Lee,et al.  The effect of polypyrrole on arteriogenesis in an acute rat infarct model. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[3]  Yasir M. Shariff,et al.  Towards nanoporous polymer thin film-based drug delivery systems , 2009 .

[4]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Milica Radisic,et al.  Interactive effects of surface topography and pulsatile electrical field stimulation on orientation and elongation of fibroblasts and cardiomyocytes. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[6]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Evaluation of silicon nanoporous membranes and ECM-based microenvironments on neurosecretory cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[7]  Robert Langer,et al.  A microfabricated scaffold for retinal progenitor cell grafting. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[8]  P. Vadgama,et al.  Polypyrrole-based conducting polymers and interactions with biological tissues , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  M. Abidian,et al.  Conducting‐Polymer Nanotubes for Controlled Drug Release , 2006, Advanced materials.

[10]  David C. Martin,et al.  Sustained release of dexamethasone from hydrophilic matrices using PLGA nanoparticles for neural drug delivery. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[11]  Charles R. Martin,et al.  Synthesis of polymeric microcapsule arrays and their use for enzyme immobilization , 1994, Nature.

[12]  D. Moran,et al.  Conductive Core–Sheath Nanofibers and Their Potential Application in Neural Tissue Engineering , 2009, Advanced functional materials.

[13]  Geoffrey M. Spinks,et al.  Conducting polymers - bridging the bionic interface. , 2007, Soft matter.

[14]  X. Cui,et al.  Sponge-like nanostructured conducting polymers for electrically controlled drug release. , 2009, Electrochemistry communications.

[15]  R. Borgens,et al.  The preparation of polypyrrole surfaces in the presence of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and their biomedical applications , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[16]  David C. Martin,et al.  In vivo studies of polypyrrole/peptide coated neural probes. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[17]  Gordon G Wallace,et al.  Optimising the incorporation and release of a neurotrophic factor using conducting polypyrrole. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[18]  M. Boman,et al.  Nanoporous aluminum oxide affects neutrophil behaviour , 2004, Microscopy research and technique.

[19]  Rebecca Kuntz Willits,et al.  Short‐duration, DC electrical stimulation increases chick embryo DRG neurite outgrowth , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.

[20]  S. Son,et al.  The nanostructure effect on the adhesion and growth rates of epithelial cells with well-defined nanoporous alumina substrates , 2010, Nanotechnology.

[21]  Christopher J Murphy,et al.  Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[22]  Nicolas H Voelcker,et al.  Evaluation of mammalian cell adhesion on surface-modified porous silicon. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Shi,et al.  A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based drug delivery system using an electrically conducting polymer , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[24]  Fang Zeng,et al.  Fabrication of Inverse Opal via Ordered Highly Charged Colloidal Spheres , 2002 .

[25]  Christine E Schmidt,et al.  Neural tissue engineering: strategies for repair and regeneration. , 2003, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[26]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  D. Edell,et al.  Factors influencing the biocompatibility of insertable silicon microshafts in cerebral cortex , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  S. Hanks,et al.  Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[29]  D. Szarowski,et al.  Cerebral Astrocyte Response to Micromachined Silicon Implants , 1999, Experimental Neurology.

[30]  M. E. Mata-Zamora,et al.  Contact angle studies on anodic porous alumina. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[31]  Daniel M. Mittleman,et al.  Template-Directed Preparation of Macroporous Polymers with Oriented and Crystalline Arrays of Voids , 1999 .