If only….: failed, missed and absent error recovery opportunities in medication errors

Background Systematic analysis of error recovery can provide hospitals with important information to help them improve their ability to detect and correct errors. Because errors will always crop up and 100% safety can never be achieved, hospitals should be able to prevent patient harm by timely and effective error recovery. Methods In this study, failed, missed and absent recovery opportunities were identified in 52 medication errors which all resulted in severe patient harm or patient death. For all identified recovery opportunities, the underlying failure factors were identified and classified according to the Eindhoven classification model. Those failure factors represent negative influences on error recovery. Results The number of recovery opportunities per error ranged from 0 to 11; on average, 2.4 recovery opportunities were identified. Of 127 identified recovery opportunities, 94 (74%) were planned and 33 (26%) were unplanned or ad hoc. Most failure factors underlying the planned recovery opportunities were organisational failure factors; most failure factors underlying the unplanned recovery opportunities were human failure factors. Conclusions From this study, it can be concluded that actual accidents can be used as an alternative data source to near misses for the analysis and understanding of error recovery. By using both sources, hospitals can enhance their resilience by reinforcing the positive influences on error recovery as well as reducing the negative ones. Together with traditional error reduction methodologies, which only concentrate on eliminating failure factors, hospitals thus have numerous opportunities to improve patient safety.

[1]  R. Thomson,et al.  What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management? , 2008, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[2]  O. Svenson,et al.  Accident and Incident Analysis Based on the Accident Evolution and Barrier Function ( AEB) Model , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[3]  Eitan Naveh,et al.  Safety Climate in Health Care Organizations: A Multidimensional Approach , 2005 .

[4]  T. V. D. Schaaf,et al.  Biases in a medical incident causation database: a quantitative evaluation using PRISMA-Medical , 2005 .

[5]  P. Aspden.  Patient Safety: Achieving a New Standard for Care , 2004 .

[6]  T. van der Schaaf,et al.  Error recovery in a hospital pharmacy , 2006, Ergonomics.

[7]  H S Kaplan,et al.  The attributes of medical event-reporting systems: experience with a prototype medical event-reporting system for transfusion medicine. , 1998, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[8]  T. W. van der Schaaf,et al.  Near Miss Reporting as a Safety Tool , 1991 .

[9]  Anna Gawlinski,et al.  Strategies used by nurses to recover medical errors in an academic emergency department setting. , 2006, Applied nursing research : ANR.

[10]  John C. Morey,et al.  Simulation based teamwork training for emergency department staff: does it improve clinical team performance when added to an existing didactic teamwork curriculum? , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  K. Henriksen,et al.  Hindsight bias, outcome knowledge and adaptive learning , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[12]  M Tamuz,et al.  Defining and classifying medical error: lessons for patient safety reporting systems , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  K Henriksen,et al.  Issues in the design of training for quality and safety , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[14]  W. Runciman,et al.  An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification , 2006, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[15]  Joel Waldfogel,et al.  Introduction , 2010, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[16]  van der Tw Tjerk Schaaf,et al.  Systems for near miss reporting and analysis , 2005 .

[17]  K B Haller,et al.  Evaluation of the culture of safety: survey of clinicians and managers in an academic medical center , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[18]  Douglas H. Fernald,et al.  Stopping the error cascade: a report on ameliorators from the ASIPS collaborative , 2007, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[19]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of Human Work , 2005 .