Characterization of biofilms formed by Candida parapsilosis, C. metapsilosis, and C. orthopsilosis.

Infections due to Candida parapsilosis have been associated with the ability of this fungus to form biofilms on indwelling medical devices. Recently, C. parapsilosis isolates were reclassified into 3 genetically non-identical classes: C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Little information is available regarding the ability of these newly reclassified species to form biofilms on biomedical substrates. In this study, we characterized biofilm formation by 10 clinical isolates each of C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. metapsilosis. Biofilms were allowed to form on silicone elastomer discs to early (6h) or mature (48 h) phases and quantified by tetrazolium (XTT) and dry weight assays. Surface topography and three-dimensional architecture of the biofilms were visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), respectively. Metabolic activity assay revealed strain-dependent biofilm forming ability of the 3 species tested, while biomass determination revealed that all 3 species formed equivalent biofilms (P>0.05 for all comparisons). SEM analyses of representative isolates of these species showed biofilms with clusters of yeast cells adherent to the catheter surface. Additionally, confocal microscopy analyses showed the presence of cells embedded in biofilms ranging in thickness between 62 and 85 microm. These results demonstrate that similar to C. parapsilosis, the 2 newly identified Candida species (C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis) were able to form biofilms.

[1]  S. Suh,et al.  Biofilm Production by Isolates of Candida Species Recovered from Nonneutropenic Patients: Comparison of Bloodstream Isolates with Isolates from Other Sources , 2002, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[2]  S. Lockhart,et al.  Geographic Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility of the Newly Described Species Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis in Comparison to the Closely Related Species Candida parapsilosis , 2008, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Antifungal Resistance of Candidal Biofilms Formed on Denture Acrylic in vitro , 2001, Journal of dental research.

[4]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Candida parapsilosis Characterization in an Outbreak Setting , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[5]  S. Suh,et al.  Differences in biofilm production by three genotypes of Candida parapsilosis from clinical sources. , 2005, Medical mycology.

[6]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Uses and Limitations of the XTT Assay in Studies of Candida Growth and Metabolism , 2003, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  L. Hensgens,et al.  Genotyping of Candida orthopsilosis Clinical Isolates by Amplification Fragment Length Polymorphism Reveals Genetic Diversity among Independent Isolates and Strain Maintenance within Patients , 2007, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[8]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Comparison of Biofilms Formed by Candidaalbicans and Candidaparapsilosis on Bioprosthetic Surfaces , 2002, Infection and Immunity.

[9]  M. Maiden,et al.  Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. To Replace Candida parapsilosis Groups II and III , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[10]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  Parenteral lipid emulsion induces germination of Candida albicans and increases biofilm formation on medical catheter surfaces. , 2009, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  M. Ghannoum,et al.  In vitro growth and analysis of Candida biofilms , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[12]  M. Pfaller,et al.  Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis: a Persistent Public Health Problem , 2007, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.