Being on the same wavelength: Behavioral synchrony between partners and its influence on the experience of intimacy

Although coordination between partners has been considered in the clinical literature as an indication of intimate relationships, the influence of simple motor synchrony on the experience of intimacy has not been established yet. Four studies examined whether synchrony, temporal alignment of simple motor periodic behaviors between partners, instilled a sense of intimacy. In Study 1, same-sex strangers discussed positive or neutral events while their motion synchrony and experiences of intimacy were measured. In Study 2, same-sex strangers pedaled bicycles in either synchronous or asynchronous rhythms while discussing personal events and then rated how intimate they felt. Studies 3 and 4 examined whether the effect of synchronization would generalize to perceptions of intimacy and desire among romantically involved heterosexual participants. Results showed that key aspects of intimacy were associated with synchrony or were higher following synchronized versus unsynchronized interactions, suggesting that synchrony serves as a nonverbal mechanism that promotes closeness in intimate situations.

[1]  Dimitris Xygalatas,et al.  Sync to link: Endorphin-mediated synchrony effects on cooperation , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[2]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Y. Golland,et al.  The Mere Co-Presence: Synchronization of Autonomic Signals and Emotional Responses across Co-Present Individuals Not Engaged in Direct Interaction , 2015, PloS one.

[4]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  On Context Dependence of Behavioral Variability in Inter-Personal Coordination , 2003, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport.

[5]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Dynamics of Interpersonal Coordination , 2008 .

[6]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[7]  C. Frith,et al.  Follow you, Follow me: Continuous Mutual Prediction and Adaptation in Joint Tapping , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Passion, Intimacy, and Time: Passionate Love as a Function of Change in Intimacy , 1999, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[9]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Scott S. Wiltermuth,et al.  Synchrony and Cooperation , 2009, Psychological science.

[11]  R. Pickler,et al.  Mother-infant synchrony. , 2009, Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN.

[12]  D. Olson,et al.  Assessing Intimacy: The Pair Inventory† , 1981 .

[13]  S. Jourard,et al.  Self-disclosure and other-cathexis. , 1959, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[14]  C. Frith,et al.  Alignment in social interactions , 2017, Consciousness and Cognition.

[15]  W. S. Condon The Relation of Interactional Synchrony to Cognitive and Emotional Processes , 1981 .

[16]  R. Feldman,et al.  Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[17]  D. DeSteno,et al.  The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability , 2010 .

[18]  Linda Tickle-Degnen,et al.  Group rapport and nonverbal behavior. , 1987 .

[19]  J. Cappella The Biological Origins of Automated Patterns of Human Interaction , 1991 .

[20]  Kevin Shockley,et al.  Interpersonal Synergies , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[21]  B. Wampold,et al.  Sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. , 1981, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[22]  U. Hess,et al.  Emotional Mimicry as Social Regulation , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[23]  H. Leitenberg,et al.  Sexual fantasy. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Roger T. Dean,et al.  Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability , 2014, Cognitive Processing.

[25]  Nicoleta Corbu,et al.  No consensus on framing? Towards an integrative approach to define frames both as text and visuals , 2012 .

[26]  N. Sebanz,et al.  Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data , 2011 .

[27]  J. Gottman,et al.  The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. , 1977 .

[28]  Lior Noy,et al.  Being in the zone: physiological markers of togetherness in joint improvisation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  G. Birnbaum Sexy building blocks: The contribution of the sexual system to attachment formation and maintenance. , 2014 .

[30]  Piercarlo Valdesolo,et al.  Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. , 2011, Emotion.

[31]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. , 2012, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[32]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Interactional Synchrony and Rapport: Measuring Synchrony in Displays Devoid of Sound and Facial Affect , 1994 .

[33]  J. Cappella On Defining Conversational Coordination and Rapport , 1990 .

[34]  Sharon Bond Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change , 2009 .

[35]  J. Begin,et al.  Immediacy Behaviours and Synchrony in Satisfied and Dissatisfied Couples , 2000 .

[36]  Christina C. Norman,et al.  Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  D. Lakens,et al.  If They Move in Sync, They Must Feel in Sync: Movement Synchrony Leads to Attributions of Rapport and Entitativity , 2011 .

[38]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Multilevel Selection Theory and Major Evolutionary Transitions , 2008 .

[39]  K. Shockley,et al.  Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Mark H. Davis Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. , 1983 .

[41]  J. Simpson,et al.  Desire under attack: Attachment orientations and the effects of relationship threat on sexual motivations , 2011 .

[42]  In and Out of a Daydream , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[43]  C. Macrae,et al.  The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception , 2009 .

[44]  R. Bootsma,et al.  Two-handed performance of a rhythmical fitts task by individuals and dyads. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  K. Barrett,et al.  Ganong's Review of Medical Physiology , 2010 .

[46]  J. Cappella Behavioral and Judged Coordination in Adult Informal Social Interactions: Vocal and Kinesic Indicators , 1997 .

[47]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Neural dynamics underlying emotional transmissions between individuals , 2017, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[48]  Michael J. Hove,et al.  It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation , 2009 .

[49]  Frank J. Bernieri,et al.  Coordinated movement and rapport in teacher-student interactions , 1988 .

[50]  G. Birnbaum Beyond the borders of reality: Attachment orientations and sexual fantasies , 2007 .

[51]  H. Reis,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Intimately Connected : The Importance of Partner Responsiveness for Experiencing Sexual Desire , 2016 .

[52]  R. Feldman From biological rhythms to social rhythms: Physiological precursors of mother-infant synchrony. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[53]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Perceived interpersonal synchrony increases empathy: Insights from autism spectrum disorder , 2016, Cognition.

[54]  Shelly L. Gable,et al.  Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[55]  H. Reis,et al.  When Does Responsiveness Pique Sexual Interest? Attachment and Sexual Desire in Initial Acquaintanceships , 2012, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  You are in sync with me: Neural correlates of interpersonal synchrony with a partner , 2014, Neuroscience.

[57]  Joseph Bulbulia,et al.  Let’s Dance Together: Synchrony, Shared Intentionality and Cooperation , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  G. Birnbaum,et al.  The Thin Line Between Reality and Imagination: Attachment Orientations and the Effects of Relationship Threats on Sexual Fantasies , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[60]  Paul W. Eastwick,et al.  In live interaction, does familiarity promote attraction or contempt? Reply to Norton, Frost, and Ariely (2011). , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[61]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  Joseph Bulbulia,et al.  Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? , 2014 .

[63]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  SOCIALLY SITUATED COGNITION IN PERSPECTIVE , 2013 .

[64]  Paula Fitzpatrick,et al.  Understanding social motor coordination. , 2011, Human movement science.