What drives consumers to use P2P payment systems? An analytical approach based on the stimulus–organism–response (S-O-R) model

PurposeTraditional payment systems based on cash and bank cards are being replaced by new innovative formats. This research analyzes the success factors in the adoption by customers of Bizum, a peer-to-peer (P2P) mobile payment system widely used in Spain. This study proposes a theoretical framework based on the Stimulus–Organism–Response (S-O-R) model and includes the analysis of the moderating effect of perceived risk and the mediating effect of perceived trust.Design/methodology/approachTo achieve the proposed objectives, an online questionnaire was administered to 701 Spanish smartphone users, potential users of the proposed P2P payment systems.FindingsThe results show that perceived usefulness is the most important predictor of intention to use. Additionally, a medium predictive relevance performance of the proposed model is found.Originality/valueThis research contributes to a more holistic understanding of the adoption of P2P payment systems and provides new business opportunities that companies can exploit through the use of this technology.

[1]  K. Sharma,et al.  The diffusion of mobile payments: Profiling the adopters and non-adopters, Roger's way , 2023, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[2]  F. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  Intention to use e-commerce vs physical shopping. Difference between consumers in the post-COVID era , 2023, Journal of Business Research.

[3]  Arta Antonovica,et al.  What are the leading factors for using Spanish peer-to-peer mobile payment platform Bizum? The applied analysis of the UTAUT2 model , 2023, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  A. Irimia-Diéguez,et al.  Predicting Fintech Innovation Adoption: the Mediator Role of Social Norms and Attitudes , 2023, Financial Innovation.

[5]  Crystal T. Lee,et al.  Smile to pay: predicting continuous usage intention toward contactless payment services in the post-COVID-19 era , 2022, International Journal of Bank Marketing.

[6]  June Wei,et al.  What’s Stopping You from Migrating to Mobile Payment? , 2022, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction.

[7]  M. Ashiq,et al.  Past, Present and Future of FinTech Research: A Bibliometric Analysis , 2022, SAGE Open.

[8]  D. Belanche,et al.  Customer adoption of p2p mobile payment systems: The role of perceived risk , 2022, Telematics Informatics.

[9]  J. Henseler,et al.  Assessing the overall fit of composite models estimated by partial least squares path modeling , 2022, European Journal of Marketing.

[10]  S. Tung,et al.  The rise of online food delivery culture during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of intention and its associated risk , 2022, European Journal of Management and Business Economics.

[11]  F. Muñoz-Leiva,et al.  Do biometric payment systems work during the COVID-19 pandemic? Insights from the Spanish users' viewpoint , 2022, Financial Innovation.

[12]  Tingting Li,et al.  What drives consumers' purchase intention of online paid knowledge? A stimulus-organism-response perspective , 2022, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[13]  Aashish Garg,et al.  I won't touch money because it is dirty: examining customer's loyalty toward M-payment , 2021, International Journal of Bank Marketing.

[14]  Wei Xue,et al.  WeChat mobile-payment-based smart retail customer experience: an integrated framework , 2021, Information Technology and Management.

[15]  Fan Yang,et al.  Does fintech innovation promote enterprise transformation? Evidence from China , 2021, Technology in Society.

[16]  Shuang Zhao Analysis of internet finance development trend of Chinese e-commerce enterprises based on P2P business platform model , 2021, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[17]  F. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  To buy or not to buy, that is the question: understanding the determinants of the urge to buy impulsively on Instagram Commerce , 2021, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing.

[18]  Donghee Yvette Wohn,et al.  The Interplay of Financial Exchanges and Offline Interpersonal Relationships through Digital Peer-to-Peer Payments , 2021, Telematics Informatics.

[19]  C. Lentner,et al.  FinTech payments in the era of COVID-19: Factors influencing behavioral intentions of “Generation X” in Hungary to use mobile payment , 2021, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance.

[20]  A. Tiwari,et al.  How does convenience impact showrooming intention? Omnichannel retail strategies to manage global retail apocalypse , 2021, Journal of Strategic Marketing.

[21]  Nidhi Singh,et al.  Examining the determinants of continuance intention to use and the moderating effect of the gender and age of users of NFC mobile payments: a multi-analytical approach , 2021, Information Technology and Management.

[22]  Himanshu Singla,et al.  A Pathway to Technology Integration: Eliciting Consumer’s Behavioural Intention to Use Paytm Services , 2021 .

[23]  F. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  Social commerce website design, perceived value and loyalty behavior intentions: The moderating roles of gender, age and frequency of use , 2021 .

[24]  Wenyuan Li,et al.  Effects of perceived service quality, website quality, and reputation on purchase intention: The mediating and moderating roles of trust and perceived risk in online shopping , 2021, Cogent Business & Management.

[25]  Sebastian Molinillo,et al.  Exploring the Determinants of Intention to Use P2P Mobile Payment in Spain , 2020, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[26]  Nripendra P. Rana,et al.  Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal , 2020, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[27]  Kalliopi Chatzipanagiotou,et al.  Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited , 2020, Journal of Business Research.

[28]  Lisa Schmidthuber,et al.  Disruptive technologies and abundance in the service sector - toward a refined technology acceptance model , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[29]  Hai Zhang,et al.  Determining the antecedents of mobile payment loyalty: Cognitive and affective perspectives , 2020, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[30]  J. Wincent,et al.  The evolution of the financial technology ecosystem: An introduction and agenda for future research on disruptive innovations in ecosystems , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[31]  Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  Explanatory and predictive model of the adoption of P2P payment systems , 2020, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[32]  Ziaul Haque Munim,et al.  Reward crowdfunding contribution as planned behaviour: An extended framework , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[33]  Lola Hernández,et al.  Are Instant Payments Becoming the New Normal? A Comparative Study , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Sebastian Molinillo,et al.  A multi-analytical approach to peer-to-peer mobile payment acceptance prediction , 2019, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services.

[35]  M. Meyliana,et al.  The Influence of Perceived Risk and Trust in Adoption of FinTech Services in Indonesia , 2019, CommIT (Communication and Information Technology) Journal.

[36]  M. Yasin,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INTENTION TO FORWARD ONLINE COMPANY-GENERATED CONTENT VIA FACEBOOK , 2019, International Review of Management and Marketing.

[37]  Shuai Ding,et al.  Adoption Intention of Fintech Services for Bank Users: An Empirical Examination with an Extended Technology Acceptance Model , 2019, Symmetry.

[38]  F. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  Assesing the role of risk and trust in consumers ’ adoption of online payment systems , 2019 .

[39]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  Brave new world: service robots in the frontline , 2018, Journal of Service Management.

[40]  Hyun-Sun Ryu,et al.  What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech?: the moderating effect of user type , 2018, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[41]  Key Pousttchi,et al.  Exploring the digitalization impact on consumer decision-making in retail banking , 2018, Electronic Markets.

[42]  Ned Kock,et al.  Minimum sample size estimation in PLS‐SEM: The inverse square root and gamma‐exponential methods , 2018, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Lingling Gao,et al.  Examining the role of initial trust in user adoption of mobile payment services: an empirical investigation , 2015, Information Systems Frontiers.

[44]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[45]  Kamel Rouibah,et al.  The Effects of Perceived Enjoyment and Perceived Risks on Trust Formation and Intentions to Use Online Payment Systems: New Perspectives from an Arab Country , 2016, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[46]  Christian Nitzl,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Helping Researchers Discuss More Sophisticated Models , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[47]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Testing measurement invariance of composites using partial least squares , 2016 .

[48]  Francisco J. Liébana-Cabanillas,et al.  Determinants of the intention to use NFC technology as a payment system: an acceptance model approach , 2015, Information Systems and e-Business Management.

[49]  Keng-Boon Ooi,et al.  An SEM-artificial-neural-network analysis of the relationships between SERVPERF, customer satisfaction and loyalty among low-cost and full-service airline , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  N. Kock Common Method Bias in PLS-SEM: A Full Collinearity Assessment Approach , 2015, Int. J. e Collab..

[51]  Ned Kock,et al.  Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  ShmueliGalit,et al.  Predictive analytics in information systems research , 2011 .

[53]  R. Yan,et al.  Application of the Stimulus-Organism-Response model to the retail environment: the role of hedonic motivation in impulse buying behavior , 2011 .

[54]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[55]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[56]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The impact of Web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[57]  F. Lai,et al.  An empirical assessment and application of SERVQUAL in mainland China's mobile communications industry , 2007 .

[58]  Robin L. Wakefield,et al.  Examining User Perceptions of Third-Party Organizations Credibility and Trust in an E-Retailer , 2006, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[59]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal Test , 2004, MIS Q..

[60]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[61]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Institution-Based Trust in Interorganizational Exchange Relationships: The Role of Online B2B Marketplaces on Trust Formation , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Predicting E-Services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[63]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Consumer trust in an Internet store , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[64]  J. Steenkamp,et al.  Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research , 1998 .

[65]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality , 1996 .

[67]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[68]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[69]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[70]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[71]  R. Masa’deh,et al.  An empirical investigation on acceptance of mobile payment system services in Jordan: extending UTAUT2 model with security and privacy , 2023, Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst..

[72]  R. K. Kovid,et al.  Exploring trust and responsiveness as antecedents for intention to use FinTech services , 2021, International Journal of Economics and Business Research.

[73]  THE IMPORTANT OF SERVICE QUALITY AND THE TRUST IN TECHNOLOGY ON USERS PERSPECTIVES TO CONTINUES USE Of MOBILE SERVICES , 2018 .

[74]  Zoran Kalinic,et al.  International Journal of Information Management , 2016 .

[75]  C. Ennew,et al.  Measuring trust in financial services: the Trust Index , 2007 .

[76]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[77]  J. Rossiter,et al.  Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach , 1982 .