The Energy Mosaic Austria—A Nationwide Energy and Greenhouse Gas Inventory on Municipal Level as Action Field of Integrated Spatial and Energy Planning

While climate agreements are made on an international level, the measures for mitigating climate change must be executed on a local scale. Designing energy and climate related strategies on the level of municipalities has been hampered by the lack of comprehensive data on the current status of energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions on the local level. A novel approach based on the so-called spatial turn in energy and climate policies has now been established in the form of the Energy Mosaic Austria, which represents a comprehensive energy and greenhouse gas inventory for all Austrian municipalities considering different purposes of energy consumption and different energy sources. The inventory is based on the linkage of bottom-up and top-down operations, utilizing data on land use and mobility structures on the municipal level. The outcomes provide a detailed insight into the pattern of energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions that are resolved on the municipal level. A spatially differentiated analysis of the inventory yields dependencies of the energy consumption and the greenhouse gas emissions on spatial structures particularly due to the fractions of different types of land use including mobility. With the energy mosaic Austria, local policy makers are given an inventory with unprecedented spatial and contentual resolution, which is fully coherent with more coarse-grained provincial and nationwide compilations of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions and elucidates the scope of action in energy and climate policy from the municipal to the nationwide level.

[1]  M. Havranek,et al.  Methodology for inventorying greenhouse gas emissions from global cities , 2010 .

[2]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems , 2010 .

[3]  Daniel Mendoza,et al.  Modeling energy consumption and CO2 emissions at the urban scale: Methodological challenges and insights from the United States , 2010 .

[4]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Opening the black box of energy modelling: strategies and lessons learned , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  Alastair R. Buckley,et al.  A review of energy systems models in the UK: Prevalent usage and categorisation , 2016 .

[6]  Sven Stremke,et al.  Spatial transition analysis: Spatially explicit and evidence-based targets for sustainable energy transition at the local and regional scale , 2018 .

[7]  D. Noh,et al.  Characterizing the Difference between Indirect and Direct CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Korean Manufacturing Industries, 2004–2010 , 2018, Sustainability.

[8]  Roger J. Brooks,et al.  Choosing the best model: Level of detail, complexity, and model performance , 1996 .

[9]  Adam Hawkes,et al.  Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges , 2014 .

[10]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  A review of current challenges and trends in energy systems modeling , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[11]  Nadine Ibrahim,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from cities: comparison of international inventory frameworks , 2012 .

[12]  J. DeCarolis,et al.  The case for repeatable analysis with energy economy optimization models , 2012, 2001.10858.

[13]  Mark Jennings,et al.  A review of urban energy system models: Approaches, challenges and opportunities , 2012 .

[14]  Steven März,et al.  Bottom-up monitoring of municipal energy and climate policy: more than an alternative to top-down approaches? , 2014 .

[15]  Paul Gerard Tuohy,et al.  A modelling tool selection process for planning of community scale energy systems including storage and demand side management , 2018 .

[16]  Dieter Helm,et al.  Energy policy: security of supply, sustainability and competition , 2002 .

[17]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Energy implications of future stabilization of atmospheric CO2 content , 1998, Nature.