Effect of granularity of resource availability on the accuracy of due date assignment

In a make-to-order environment, order due dates can be assigned by consecutively estimating for each task on the order the time that the required resource will be available to perform the task. This paper examines the nature of the trade-off between the granularity of representation of resource availability, the resulting accuracy of due dates, and the computational time required to compute a due date. Granularity is defined as the size of the intervals of time (time buckets) over which available capacity is computed in a discrete-time representation of resource availability. The literature does not provide guidance on setting this important parameter, and typically it is arbitrarily set to one day or one week. Results compiled from extensive computations show consistent patterns of behaviour across all six combinations of values of experimental parameters for order size variability and system utilization. The resulting behaviour is classified into seven regions and analysed. Interestingly, results indicate that as granularity decreases the accuracy increases only up to a point, and the accuracy for very small granularities actually can be much worse than the accuracy of moderate granularities. From the results it can be concluded that when granularity is set to an appropriate value, resource availability will be estimated with relatively high accuracy and relatively low computational time, which are important performance characteristics for an order promising application.

[1]  Chien-Yu Chen,et al.  Quantity and Due Date Quoting Available to Promise , 2001, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[2]  Michael O. Ball,et al.  Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability , 2005, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  Erwin W. Hans,et al.  Robust resource loading for engineer-to-order manufacturing , 2004 .

[4]  Kum Khiong Yang,et al.  Comparison of Make-to-Order Job Shops with Different Machine Layouts and Production Control Systems , 1992 .

[5]  A. Portioli Staudacher ISTS: A new procedure for the integrated scheduling of multi-stage systems , 2000 .

[6]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  A framework for the study of due date management in job shops , 1984 .

[7]  Roberto Cigolini,et al.  Order review and release strategies ina job shop environment: A review and a classification , 1997 .

[8]  Wallace J. Hopp,et al.  Due date setting with supply constraints in systems using MRP , 2001 .

[9]  Le Gruenwald,et al.  Real-time due-date promising by build-to-order environments , 2004 .

[10]  Yon-Chun Chou,et al.  A methodology for product mix planning in semiconductor foundry manufacturing , 2000 .

[11]  Vincent A. Mabert,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF ORDER RELEASE MECHANISMS IN A JOB-SHOP ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[12]  J. Bertrand The Effect of Workload Dependent Due-Dates on Job Shop Performance , 1983 .

[13]  Timothy D. Fry,et al.  Capacity-based order review/release strategies to improve manufacturing performance , 1992 .

[14]  M. Kanezashi,et al.  Setting planned lead times for multi-operation jobs , 1996 .

[15]  Erwin W. Hans,et al.  Workload based order acceptance in job shop environments , 2005, OR Spectr..

[16]  Martin Taal,et al.  Integrating MRP and finite capacity planning , 1997 .

[17]  S. T. Enns MRP performance effects due to lot size and planned lead time settings , 2001 .

[18]  Roberto Cigolini,et al.  Comparison of Order Review and Release techniques in a dynamic and uncertain job shop environment , 1998 .

[19]  Jan Riezebos Time bucket length and lot-splitting approach , 2004 .

[20]  Jwm Will Bertrand,et al.  Economic due-date setting in job-shops based on routing and workload dependent flow time distribution functions , 2001 .

[21]  Scott A. Moses,et al.  Scalability and performance of computational structures for real-time order promising , 2005, J. Intell. Manuf..

[22]  N. Raghavan,et al.  Finite-capacity production planning algorithms for a semiconductor wafer fabrication facility , 2001 .

[23]  Paul M. Bobrowski Implementing a loading heuristic in a discrete release job shop , 1989 .

[24]  Elias Willem Hans,et al.  Resource Loading by Branch-and-Price Techniques , 2001 .

[25]  Stephen N. Chapman,et al.  Planning and Control in Multi‐Cell Manufacturing , 1995 .

[26]  G. Wullink *,et al.  Scenario-based approach for flexible resource loading under uncertainty , 2004 .