A systematic approach for watershed ecological restoration strategy making: An application in the Taizi River Basin in northern China.

Aiming to protect freshwater ecosystems, river ecological restoration has been brought into the research spotlight. However, it is challenging for decision makers to set appropriate objectives and select a combination of rehabilitation acts from numerous possible solutions to meet ecological, economic, and social demands. In this study, we developed a systematic approach to help make an optimal strategy for watershed restoration, which incorporated ecological security assessment and multi-objectives optimization (MOO) into the planning process to enhance restoration efficiency and effectiveness. The river ecological security status was evaluated by using a pressure-state-function-response (PSFR) assessment framework, and MOO was achieved by searching for the Pareto optimal solutions via Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to balance tradeoffs between different objectives. Further, we clustered the searched solutions into three types in terms of different optimized objective function values in order to provide insightful information for decision makers. The proposed method was applied in an example rehabilitation project in the Taizi River Basin in northern China. The MOO result in the Taizi River presented a set of Pareto optimal solutions that were classified into three types: I - high ecological improvement, high cost and high benefits solution; II - medial ecological improvement, medial cost and medial economic benefits solution; III - low ecological improvement, low cost and low economic benefits solution. The proposed systematic approach in our study can enhance the effectiveness of riverine ecological restoration project and could provide valuable reference for other ecological restoration planning.

[1]  P Koundouri,et al.  Development of an integrated methodology for the sustainable environmental and socio-economic management of river ecosystems. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  Jon C. Liebman,et al.  Some Simple-Minded Observations on the Role of Optimization in Public Systems Decision-Making , 1976 .

[3]  Huaicheng Guo,et al.  Water quality modeling for load reduction under uncertainty: a Bayesian approach. , 2008, Water research.

[4]  Wei Meng,et al.  Water quality assessment and source identification of Daliao river basin using multivariate statistical methods , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[5]  F. Guo,et al.  Paradigms of mangroves in treatment of anthropogenic wastewater pollution. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  P. Döll,et al.  Assessing the ecosystem service flood protection of a riparian forest by applying a cascade approach , 2016 .

[7]  Piotr Czyzżak,et al.  Pareto simulated annealing—a metaheuristic technique for multiple‐objective combinatorial optimization , 1998 .

[8]  K. Blackstock,et al.  Linking process to outcomes — Internal and external criteria for a stakeholder involvement in River Basin Management Planning , 2012 .

[9]  Qingfu Zhang,et al.  MOEA/D: A Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[10]  K. Tockner,et al.  Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems , 2010 .

[11]  Georg Teutsch,et al.  Managing the effects of multiple stressors on aquatic ecosystems under water scarcity. The GLOBAQUA project , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  Xinlong Feng,et al.  A decision-making framework to model environmental flow requirements in oasis areas using Bayesian networks , 2016 .

[13]  Ye Tian,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design of bidirectional flow passage components using RSM and NSGA II: A case study of inlet/outlet diffusion segment in pumped storage power station , 2018 .

[14]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[15]  Masoud Rabbani,et al.  Using metaheuristic algorithms to solve a multi-objective industrial hazardous waste location-routing problem considering incompatible waste types , 2018 .

[16]  Hamed Safikhani,et al.  Modeling and Pareto based multi-objective optimization of wavy fin-and-elliptical tube heat exchangers using CFD and NSGA-II algorithm , 2017 .

[17]  Ali Sadollah,et al.  Water cycle algorithm for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[18]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015 , 2017 .

[19]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Development of a socio-ecological environmental justice model for watershed-based management , 2014 .

[20]  Yun Yang,et al.  Multi-objective optimization of long-term groundwater monitoring network design using a probabilistic Pareto genetic algorithm under uncertainty , 2016 .

[21]  J. Mant,et al.  Linking the restoration of rivers and riparian zones/wetlands in Europe: Sharing knowledge through case studies , 2013 .

[22]  Guangsheng Chen,et al.  Wetland ecosystem health assessment through integrating remote sensing and inventory data with an assessment model for the Hangzhou Bay, China. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Zhiwen Song,et al.  Seasonal and annual performance of a full-scale constructed wetland system for sewage treatment in China , 2006 .

[24]  C. Sullivan,et al.  Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions , 2014 .

[25]  Z. Ji,et al.  The costs and benefits of reforestation in Liping County, Guizhou Province, China. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Portfolio decision analysis methods in environmental decision making , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  An Integrated Simulation Method for Flash-flood Risk Assessment :2. Effect of Historical Changes in Land Use an Integrated Simulation Method for Flash-flood Risk Assessment: 2. Effects of Changes in Land-use under a Historical Perspective , 2022 .

[28]  S. Tapsell,et al.  Revisiting the River Skerne: The long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation , 2013 .

[29]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[30]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[31]  Denis Ruelland,et al.  Water supply sustainability and adaptation strategies under anthropogenic and climatic changes of a meso-scale Mediterranean catchment. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[32]  Y. Chee.  An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services , 2004 .

[33]  Jorge Curiel-Esparza,et al.  Consensus in prioritizing river rehabilitation projects through the integration of social, economic and landscape indicators , 2017 .

[34]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis to select metrics for design and monitoring of sustainable ecosystem restorations , 2013 .

[35]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  Constrained, mixed-integer and multi-objective optimisation of building designs by NSGA-II with fitness approximation , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[36]  Lianxi Sheng,et al.  Ecological engineering restoration of a non-point source polluted river in Northern China , 2015 .

[37]  A. Kivaisi.  The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: a review , 2001 .

[38]  Dongqing Zhang,et al.  Constructed wetlands in China , 2009 .

[39]  Brendan A. Wintle,et al.  Modelling the benefits of habitat restoration in socio-ecological systems , 2014 .

[40]  Guoqian Chen,et al.  A vertical subsurface-flow constructed wetland in Beijing , 2008 .

[41]  P. Verburg,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives , 2015 .

[42]  Hai Liu,et al.  A review on the sustainability of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: Design and operation. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[43]  Lies Huysegoms,et al.  Critical review of decision support tools for sustainability assessment of site remediation options. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[44]  David B Lindenmayer,et al.  Adaptive monitoring: a new paradigm for long-term research and monitoring. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  Mahdi Bashiri,et al.  An improved evolutionary algorithm for handling many-objective optimization problems , 2017, Appl. Soft Comput..

[46]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[47]  Zhaoyin Wang,et al.  A review of ecological restoration techniques in fluvial rivers , 2016 .

[48]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  SPEA2: Improving the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm , 2001 .

[49]  P Koundouri,et al.  An integrated assessment framework for the analysis of multiple pressures in aquatic ecosystems and the appraisal of management options. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[50]  Alexey Voinov,et al.  A review of methods, data, and models to assess changes in the value of ecosystem services from land degradation and restoration , 2016 .

[51]  E. Gaddis,et al.  Lessons for successful participatory watershed modeling: A perspective from modeling practitioners , 2008 .

[52]  W. Meng,et al.  Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China , 2014 .

[53]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Linking watershed-scale stream health and socioeconomic indicators with spatial clustering and structural equation modeling , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[54]  Min Fan,et al.  Optimal conservation planning of multiple hydrological ecosystem services under land use and climate changes in Teshio river watershed, northernmost of Japan , 2016 .

[55]  S. Linke,et al.  Systematic planning for river rehabilitation: integrating multiple ecological and economic objectives in complex decisions , 2012 .

[56]  Peter J. Fleming,et al.  An Overview of Evolutionary Algorithms in Multiobjective Optimization , 1995, Evolutionary Computation.

[57]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Muiltiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms , 1994, Evolutionary Computation.

[58]  Zhimin Qiang,et al.  Effect of artificial aeration on the performance of vertical-flow constructed wetland treating heavily polluted river water. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[59]  P. Nagler,et al.  Effectiveness of environmental flows for riparian restoration in arid regions: A tale of four rivers , 2017 .

[60]  Chandan Guria,et al.  The elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm with inheritance (i-NSGA-II) and its jumping gene adaptations for multi-objective optimization , 2017, Inf. Sci..

[61]  S. Bricker,et al.  An integrated methodology for assessment of estuarine trophic status , 2003 .

[62]  K. Limburg,et al.  Connecting the ecological-economic dots in human-dominated watersheds: Models to link socio-economic activities on the landscape to stream ecosystem health , 2009 .

[63]  Christian Wolter,et al.  Coupling systematic planning and expert judgement enhances the efficiency of river restoration. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[64]  Ali Danandeh Mehr,et al.  A Pareto-optimal moving average multigene genetic programming model for daily streamflow prediction , 2017 .

[65]  Pute Wu,et al.  A framework of indicator system for zoning of agricultural water and land resources utilization: A case study of Bayan Nur, Inner Mongolia , 2014 .

[66]  J. Olden,et al.  Process-Based Principles for Restoring River Ecosystems , 2010 .