Web 2.0 enabled employee collaboration in diverse sme networks: a ceos perspective

With the emergence of phenomena like computer supported cooperative work, and especially with user-generated content and Web 2.0, new opportunities for SMEs occurred in order to collaborate on an employees’ level. As claimed by open innovation researchers, a heterogeneous group of (external) users can increase a firm’s innovative performance. These external users can be found in the form of employees of other firms participating in a SME network. However, especially SMEs are influenced by the founder’s personality and his practiced level of control, both in an offline and in an online world. Using a multi-method approach, we focus on CEOs’ perceptions of the potentials and pitfalls of Web 2.0 usage for business collaboration among employees of different firms. By providing evidence with a focus on competitive and non-competitive business collaboration mediated by Web 2.0 technologies this research may be considered an important basis for further research in employee creativity, idea generation and open innovation.

[1]  P. Järvinen Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[2]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory , 1989 .

[3]  James Simmie,et al.  Knowledge Spillovers and Reasons for the Concentration of Innovative SMEs , 2002 .

[4]  G. Rao,et al.  Open Innovation , 2019, Strategic Decisions.

[5]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[6]  A. Thakor,et al.  Information Control, Career Concerns and Corporate Governance , 2006 .

[7]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation , 2008 .

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[9]  José van Dijck,et al.  Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content , 2009 .

[10]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Stimulating the Potential: Creative Performance and Communication in Innovation Teams , 2004 .

[11]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[12]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Towards a pluralistic conception of research methods in information systems research , 2006 .

[13]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[14]  Todd Dewett,et al.  Linking Intrinsic Motivation, Risk Taking, and Employee Creativity in an R&D Environment , 2007 .

[15]  Jonathan Glover,et al.  The interaction between decision and control problems and , 1997 .

[16]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Epistemological Perspectives on Multi-Method Information Systems Research , 2005, ECIS.

[17]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Co‐opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model , 2009 .

[18]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  Two's Company, Three's a Crowd? Triads in Cooperative-Competitive Networks , 2007 .

[19]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  The Logic of Open Innovation: Managing Intellectual Property , 2003 .

[20]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[21]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[22]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Open R&D and Open Innovation: Exploring the Phenomenon , 2009 .

[23]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Unravelling the Process from Closed to Open Innovation: Evidence from Mature, Asset-Intensive Industries , 2010 .

[24]  S. Snell Control Theory In Strategic Human Resource Management: The Mediating Effect Of Administrative Information , 1992 .

[25]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[26]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[27]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[28]  Allan Afuah,et al.  Users as Innovators: A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions , 2009 .

[29]  David E. Millard,et al.  Web 2.0: hypertext by any other name? , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[30]  A. Cameron,et al.  External Relationships and the Small Business: A Review of Small Business Alliance and Network Research** , 2007 .

[31]  Herbert Kotzab,et al.  Value-adding partnerships and co-opetition models in the grocery industry , 2003 .

[32]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Investigating the Antecedents of Team-Based Clan Control: Adding Social Capital as a Predictor , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[33]  W. Ouchi A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms , 1979 .

[34]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Web 2.0 in the Business Environment: The New Intranet or a Passing Hype? , 2008, ECIS.

[35]  R. Woodman,et al.  Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome Expectations , 2010 .

[36]  G. Graen,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF LEADERSHIP AND EMPLOYEE CREATIVITY: THE RELEVANCE OF TRAITS AND RELATIONSHIPS , 1999 .

[37]  G. Pisano Which kind of collaboration is right for you , 2009 .

[38]  David E. Avison,et al.  Action research , 1999, CACM.

[39]  Luke Tredinnick Web 2.0 and Business , 2006 .

[40]  Markus Nüttgens,et al.  Web 2.0 in SME Networks - A Design Science Approach Considering Multi-perspective Requirements , 2009, AMCIS/SIGeBIZ.

[41]  Marcus M. Keupp,et al.  Determinants and Archetype Users of Open Innovation , 2009 .

[42]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[43]  Joshua L. Cox,et al.  Blogs and the corporation: managing the risk, reaping the benefits , 2008 .

[44]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[45]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[46]  R. Grotz Networks, milieu and industrial firm strategies: empirical evidence of an innovative SME environment. , 1993 .

[47]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[48]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .