Microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography based on probabilistic reconstruction

The performance of the existing reconstruction algorithms based on compressive sensing (CS) in microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography (MITAT) is influenced by the positions of detectors. Besides, some a priori information, such as target distribution or the correlation among thermoacoustic signals, has not been taken into account. In this letter, a probabilistic reconstruction algorithm in MITAT based on sparse Bayesian learning is proposed. Different from norm-based point estimation algorithms in CS, the sound pressure distribution which needs to be estimated is provided by probability distributions in the probabilistic reconstruction algorithm and an image is reconstructed based on the posterior density. Compared with the widely used norm-based point estimation algorithms (GPSR, Lasso) whose solution is not always the sparsest, the sparse Bayesian learning framework is globally convergent which can produce the sparsest solution at the posterior mean. Therefore, the robustness of the probabilistic reconstruction is better than that of norm-based point estimation algorithms. In addition, the estimations of the initial pressure distributions can be more accurately provided if the correlation of thermoacoustic signals can be considered, especially under the condition of low signal to noise ratio (SNR). Simulations and experiments on real breast tumors demonstrate that the proposed algorithm improves the robustness of reconstruction and show better performance at low SNRs.The performance of the existing reconstruction algorithms based on compressive sensing (CS) in microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography (MITAT) is influenced by the positions of detectors. Besides, some a priori information, such as target distribution or the correlation among thermoacoustic signals, has not been taken into account. In this letter, a probabilistic reconstruction algorithm in MITAT based on sparse Bayesian learning is proposed. Different from norm-based point estimation algorithms in CS, the sound pressure distribution which needs to be estimated is provided by probability distributions in the probabilistic reconstruction algorithm and an image is reconstructed based on the posterior density. Compared with the widely used norm-based point estimation algorithms (GPSR, Lasso) whose solution is not always the sparsest, the sparse Bayesian learning framework is globally convergent which can produce the sparsest solution at the posterior mean. Therefore, the robustness of the probabilistic r...

[1]  Tanja Tarvainen,et al.  Image reconstruction with uncertainty quantification in photoacoustic tomography. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse Bayesian learning for basis selection , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic computed tomography correcting for heterogeneity and attenuation. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[4]  Quan Zhou,et al.  Microwave-induced thermoacoustic scanning CT for high-contrast and noninvasive breast cancer imaging. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Mitigating acoustic heterogeneous effects in microwave-induced breast thermoacoustic tomography using multi-physical K-means clustering , 2017 .

[6]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Microwave-Induced Thermal Acoustic Tomography for Breast Tumor Based on Compressive Sensing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Zaiping Nie,et al.  Reducing the effects of acoustic heterogeneity with an iterative reconstruction method from experimental data in microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography. , 2015, Medical physics.

[8]  Yuanjin Zheng,et al.  Electrical circuit modeling and analysis of microwave acoustic interaction with biological tissues. , 2014, Medical physics.

[9]  M. Lindstrom,et al.  A large-scale study of the ultrawideband microwave dielectric properties of normal breast tissue obtained from reduction surgeries , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Block based compressive sensing method of microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography for breast tumor detection , 2017 .

[11]  David P. Wipf,et al.  Iterative Reweighted 1 and 2 Methods for Finding Sparse Solutions , 2010, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process..

[12]  Liming Nie,et al.  Hemispherical photoacoustic imaging of myocardial infarction: in vivo detection and monitoring , 2017, European Radiology.

[13]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Evaluation of Contrast Enhancement by Carbon Nanotubes for Microwave-Induced Thermoacoustic Tomography , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Yu Liu,et al.  In Vivo Photoacoustic Imaging of Brain Injury and Rehabilitation by High‐Efficient Near‐Infrared Dye Labeled Mesenchymal Stem Cells with Enhanced Brain Barrier Permeability , 2017, Advanced science.

[15]  Yuanjin Zheng,et al.  Magnetically mediated thermoacoustic imaging toward deeper penetration , 2013 .

[16]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Extension of SBL Algorithms for the Recovery of Block Sparse Signals With Intra-Block Correlation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[17]  Bhaskar D. Rao,et al.  Sparse Signal Recovery With Temporally Correlated Source Vectors Using Sparse Bayesian Learning , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[18]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Effects of small variations of speed of sound in optoacoustic tomographic imaging. , 2014, Medical physics.

[19]  Dan Wu,et al.  Contrast Agents for Photoacoustic and Thermoacoustic Imaging: A Review , 2014, International journal of molecular sciences.

[20]  Zaiping Nie,et al.  Hierarchical dictionary compressive sensing (HDCS) method in microwave induced thermal acoustic tomography , 2014, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[21]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Functional photoacoustic microscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Yuanjin Zheng,et al.  Microwave-acoustic phasoscopy for tissue characterization , 2012 .

[23]  Da Xing,et al.  Ultrashort Microwave-Pumped Real-Time Thermoacoustic Breast Tumor Imaging System , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Fei Gao,et al.  Thermoacoustic resonance effect and circuit modelling of biological tissue , 2013 .

[25]  Michael E. Tipping Sparse Bayesian Learning and the Relevance Vector Machine , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[26]  R. Kruger,et al.  Breast cancer in vivo: contrast enhancement with thermoacoustic CT at 434 MHz-feasibility study. , 2000, Radiology.

[27]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Suppressing excitation effects in microwave induced thermoacoustic tomography by multi-view Hilbert transformation , 2017 .

[28]  R. Witte,et al.  Quality Improvement of Thermoacoustic Imaging Based on Compressive Sensing , 2015, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters.

[29]  Fei Gao,et al.  Advanced photoacoustic and thermoacoustic sensing and imaging beyond pulsed absorption contrast , 2016 .

[30]  Tao Qin,et al.  Computational Feasibility Study of Contrast-Enhanced Thermoacoustic Imaging for Breast Cancer Detection Using Realistic Numerical Breast Phantoms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[31]  R A Kruger,et al.  Thermoacoustic computed tomography--technical considerations. , 1999, Medical physics.

[32]  B. Pogue,et al.  Automated region detection based on the contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography. , 2004, Applied optics.

[33]  Lihong V. Wang,et al.  Photoacoustic Tomography: In Vivo Imaging from Organelles to Organs , 2012, Science.

[34]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  In-vivo handheld optoacoustic tomography of the human thyroid , 2016, Photoacoustics.