An Offline Evaluation of the Autoregressive Spectrum for Electrocorticography

Electrical signals acquired from the cortical surface, or electrocorticography (ECoG), exhibit high spatial and temporal resolution and are valuable for mapping brain activity, detecting irregularities, and controlling a brain-computer interface. As with scalp-recorded EEG, much of the identified information content in ECoG is manifested as amplitude modulations of specific frequency bands. Autoregressive (AR) spectral estimation has proven successful for modeling the well-defined and comparatively limited EEG spectrum. However, because the ECoG spectrum is significantly more extensive with yet undefined dynamics, it cannot be assumed that the ECoG spectrum can be accurately estimated using the same AR model parameters that are valid for analogous EEG studies. This study provides an offline evaluation of AR modeling of ECoG signals for detecting tongue movements. The resulting model parameters can serve as a reference for related AR spectral analysis of ECoG signals.

[1]  Bernhard Graimann,et al.  Toward a direct brain interface based on human subdural recordings and wavelet-packet analysis , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  B. Porat,et al.  Digital Spectral Analysis with Applications. , 1988 .

[3]  F. Babiloni,et al.  Autoregressive spectral analysis in Brain Computer Interface context , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  F. Dudek,et al.  Intracellular correlates of fast (>200 Hz) electrical oscillations in rat somatosensory cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Decoding two-dimensional movement trajectories using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface (BCI): model order selection for autoregressive spectral analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[7]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Electrocorticography-based brain computer Interface-the seattle experience , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Spectral Changes in Cortical Surface Potentials during Motor Movement , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  EEG-Based Communication and Control: Speed–Accuracy Relationships , 2003, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[10]  L. Zetterberg Estimation of parameters for a linear difference equation with application to EEG analysis , 1969 .

[11]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Two-dimensional movement control using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[13]  D.J. McFarland,et al.  An Evaluation of Autoregressive Spectral Estimation Model Order for Brain-Computer Interface Applications , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation: Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2006 .

[15]  J. A. Wilson,et al.  Electrocorticographically controlled brain-computer interfaces using motor and sensory imagery in patients with temporary subdural electrode implants. Report of four cases. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Generalized Features for Electrocorticographic BCIs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  J C Principe,et al.  A study on the best order for autoregressive EEG modelling. , 1987, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[18]  Gerwin Schalk,et al.  A brain–computer interface using electrocorticographic signals in humans , 2004, Journal of neural engineering.

[19]  Robert Chen,et al.  Identification of arm movements using correlation of electrocorticographic spectral components and kinematic recordings , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[20]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Methods Towards Invasive Human Brain Computer Interfaces , 2004, NIPS.