Increasing the trust in scientific authorship
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] L. Debakey,et al. Ghostwriters: not always what they appear. , 1995, JAMA.
[2] David L Streiner,et al. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals. , 2002, JAMA.
[3] William B Weeks,et al. Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[4] Tim Albert. Failed publications: the medical model , 1998, BMJ.
[5] T. Bodenheimer,et al. Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.
[6] Max Lagnado,et al. Professional writing assistance: effects on biomedical publishing , 2003, Learn. Publ..
[7] D. Rennie,et al. The contributions of authors. , 2000, JAMA.
[8] R Bhopal,et al. The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty , 1997, BMJ.
[9] D. Healy,et al. Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics , 2003, British Journal of Psychiatry.
[10] D. Rennie,et al. Prevalence of honorary and ghost authorship in Cochrane reviews. , 2002, JAMA.
[11] Gerald E. Wickens,et al. At the Start of the 21st Century , 2001 .
[12] R. Wears,et al. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. , 2002, JAMA.
[13] M. Lagnado. Haunted papers , 2002, The Lancet.