Estimating Academic Attrition from Technical Training School Data: Method and Simulation Results

Abstract : This study proposes a logistic regression-based approach for estimating academic attrition from technical training school data. The proposed approach enables Army personnel managers to evaluate tradeoffs when making decisions about where to set minimum enlistment standards. A large-scale simulation was conducted based on actual training school data from a selected MOS to evaluate the approach and to assess sampling error of estimated attrition rates under different sample sizes and operational scenarios. Major findings indicate that: (a) a simple approach based on the logistic regression using only cognitive aptitude information is adequate for evaluating impact of changes in minimum enlistment standards on academic attrition for MOS with medium validity or greater; (b) a large enough sample size allows smaller changes in minimum enlistment standards to achieve a targeted attrition rate with confidence; and (c) personnel and training decisions could be greatly improved by extending the current model to incorporate information in addition to cognitive aptitude. The report includes a ready-to-use statistical program for applying the proposed approach to actual training school data for the purpose of making operational decisions.

[1]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  General and Specific Cognitive and Psychomotor Abilities in Personnel Selection: The Prediction of Training and Job Performance , 2000 .

[2]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1972, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  Neal Schmitt,et al.  Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations , 1997 .

[4]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .

[5]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[6]  P. Roth MISSING DATA: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW FOR APPLIED PSYCHOLOGISTS , 1994 .

[7]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[8]  Joseph Zeidner,et al.  Evaluating military selection and classification systems in the multiple job context , 1997 .

[9]  T. Judge,et al.  Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Toward Theoretically Based Principles of Training Effectiveness: A Model and Initial Empirical Investigation , 1995 .

[11]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. , 1994, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[13]  Michele Morales Olea,et al.  Predicting pilot and navigator criteria : not much more than g , 1994 .

[14]  Malcolm James Ree,et al.  The Predictive Validity of the Asvab for Training Grades , 1992 .

[15]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  MULTI‐STAGE SELECTION STRATEGIES: A MONTE CARLO INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTS ON PERFORMANCE AND MINORITY HIRING , 1996 .

[16]  J. Heckman Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[17]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Determinants, Detection and Amelioration of Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection Procedures: Issues, Evidence and Lessons Learned , 2001 .

[18]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[19]  M. Ree,et al.  PREDICTING TRAINING SUCCESS: NOT MUCH MORE THAN g , 2006 .

[20]  G. Larson,et al.  Predictors of Navy attrition. II. A demonstration of potential usefulness for screening. , 2002, Military medicine.

[21]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Lack of Ability Is Not Always the Problem , 1999 .

[22]  N. Schmitt,et al.  Personnel Selection: A Theoretical Approach , 1998 .

[23]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[24]  Thomas R. Carretta,et al.  Role of ability and prior knowledge in complex training performance. , 1995 .

[25]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  An econometric analysis of the bank credit scoring problem , 1989 .

[26]  Philip L. Roth,et al.  DERIVATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF A META‐ANALYTIC MATRIX INCORPORATING COGNITIVE ABILITY, ALTERNATIVE PREDICTORS, AND JOB PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[27]  Jill E. Ellingson,et al.  High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education. Prospects in a post-affirmative-action world. , 2001, The American psychologist.