Mobilization of Fluids in the Intensive Treatment of Primary and Secondary Lymphedemas

Background Lymphedema is a clinical condition resulting from the accumulation of macromolecules in the interstitial space with a consequent buildup of fluids. Aim The objective of this study was to compare the therapeutic response to treatment that mobilizes fluids between primary and secondary lymphedemas. Method Thirty-three patients with severe leg lymphedema who underwent intensive treatment for five consecutive days in 2013 and 2014 at the Clínica Godoy were evaluated in a prospective clinical trial. Diagnosis was based on the patient's history and physical examination. Treatment consisted of eight hours/day of Mechanical Lymphatic Therapy using an electromechanical device (RAGodoy®) that performs plantar flexion and extension associated with 15 minutes of Cervical Lymphatic Therapy, a technique developed by Godoy and Godoy that involves stimulation in the cervical region and a grosgrain compression stocking alternated with elastic bandages. The unpaired t-test and Fisher's exact test were used for statistical analysis with an alpha error of 5% (p value < 0.05) being considering acceptable. Secondary lymphedema was more prevalent in women (Fisher exact test p value < 0.01). Results The age of patients with secondary lymphedema was greater than those with primary lymphedema (unpaired t-test: p value < 0.03). The mean volume losses were 64.62% and 48.35% for the patients with secondary and primary lymphedema, respectively (p value < 0.03). Conclusion Women are more prevalent and older in the secondary lymphedema group. Volumetric reductions below the knee are faster with intensive treatment for secondary rather than for primary lymphedema.

[1]  Frederick D. Grant,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Lymphoscintigraphy for Lymphedema and Analysis of False-Negative Tests , 2017, Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open.

[2]  J. M. Godoy,et al.  Godoy & Godoy Compression Sleeve in the Treatment of Arm Lymphedema: New Concepts for Materials , 2015 .

[3]  T. Yamamoto,et al.  IUA-ISVI consensus for diagnosis guideline of chronic lymphedema of the limbs. , 2015, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[4]  Kumiko Goto,et al.  Prevalence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Postoperative Lower Extremity Lymphedema in Women With Gynecologic Malignancies: A Retrospective Study , 2015, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[5]  F. Angst,et al.  Health and quality of life in patients with primary and secondary lymphedema of the lower extremity. , 2015, VASA. Zeitschrift fur Gefasskrankheiten.

[6]  Seung Hyun Chung,et al.  Postoperative Lower Extremity Edema in Patients with Primary Endometrial Cancer , 2015, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[7]  J. M. Godoy,et al.  Synergistic Effect of Adjustments of Elastic Stockings to Maintain Reduction in Leg Volume after Mechanical Lymph Drainage , 2014 .

[8]  J. M. D. de Godoy,et al.  Synergistic Effect of Adjustments of Elastic Stockings to Maintain Reduction in Leg Volume after Mechanical Lymph Drainage , 2014, International journal of vascular medicine.

[9]  J. M. Godoy,et al.  Godoy & Godoy technique in the treatment of lymphedema for under-privileged populations , 2010 .

[10]  J. M. D. de Godoy,et al.  Godoy & Godoy technique in the treatment of lymphedema for under-privileged populations , 2010, International journal of medical sciences.

[11]  Karina Da Silva Siqueira,et al.  Volumetric alterations utilizing the RAGodoy® device to treat lymphedema of the lower extremities , 2009 .

[12]  J. D. de Godoy,et al.  Godoy & Godoy technique of cervical stimulation in the reduction of edema of the face after cancer treatment. , 2008, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.