The Effective Enhancement of Power System Security by Flexible Transmission Line Impedance with Minimal Rescheduling of Generators

After the digital revolution, the power system security becomes an important issue and it urges the power producers to maintain a well secured system in order to supply a quality power to the end users. This paper presents an integrated Corrective Security Constrained Optimal Power Flow (CSCOPF) with Flexible Transmission Line Impedance (FTLI) to enhance the power system security. The corrective approach of SCOPF is chosen, because it allows the corrective equipment to bring back the system to a stable operating point and hence, it offers high flexibility and better economics. The concept of FTLI arises from the ability of FACTS devices such as Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitor (TCSC), which can vary the line reactance to a certain extent. An enhanced security can be achieved by incorporating FTLI into the CSCOPF problem, since the power flow in a system is highly dependent on the line reactance. FTLI based CSCOPF can reduce the amount of rescheduling of generators, but it will result in an increased number of variables and thus, the complexity to the optimization process is increased. This highly complex problem is solved by using nonlinear programming. The AC based OPF model is preferred, since the corrective security actions require highly accurate solutions. IEEE 30 bus system is used to test the proposed scheme and the results are compared with the traditional CSCOPF. It can be seen that the proposed idea provides a notable improvement in the reduction of cost incurred for restoring the system security.

[1]  A. Monticelli,et al.  Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow with Post-Contingency Corrective Rescheduling , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Hongbin Sun,et al.  Optimal Power Flow With the Consideration of Flexible Transmission Line Impedance , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Hybrid computation of corrective security-constrained optimal power flow problems , 2014 .

[4]  Dzung T. Phan,et al.  Minimal Impact Corrective Actions in Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow Via Sparsity Regularization , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  Santiago Grijalva,et al.  Flexible Security-Constrained Optimal Power Flow , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  O. Alsac,et al.  Optimal Load Flow with Steady-State Security , 1974 .

[7]  R.P. O'Neill,et al.  Optimal Transmission Switching With Contingency Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  T. S. Chung,et al.  A hybrid GA approach for OPF with consideration of FACTS devices , 2000 .

[9]  Kory W. Hedman,et al.  A Fast LP Approach for Enhanced Utilization of Variable Impedance Based FACTS Devices , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  J. A. Momoh,et al.  Power System Security Enhancement by OPF with Phase Shifter , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[11]  Ganapati Panda,et al.  Adaptive relay setting for flexible AC transmission systems (FACTS) , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[12]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.