Predicting children’s energy expenditure during physical activity using deep learning and wearable sensor data

This study examined a series of machine learning models, evaluating their effectiveness in assessing children's energy expenditure, in terms of the metabolic equivalents (MET) of physical activity (PA), from triaxial accelerometery. The study also determined the impact of the sensor placement (waist, ankle or wrist) on the machine learning model's predictive performance. Twenty eight healthy Caucasian children aged 8-11years (13 girls, 15 boys) undertook a series of activities reflective of different levels of PA (lying supine, seated and playing with Lego, slow walking, medium walking, and a medium paced run, instep passing a football, overarm throwing and catching and stationary cycling). Energy expenditure and physical activity were assessed during all activities using accelerometers (GENEActiv monitor) worn on four locations (i.e. non-dominant wrist, dominant wrist, dominant waist, dominant ankle) and breath-by-breath calorimetry data. MET values ranged from 1.2 ± 0.2 for seated playing with Lego to 4.1 ± 0.8 for running at 6.5kmph-1. Machine learning models were used to determine the MET values from the accelerometer data and to determine which placement location performed more effectively in predicting the PA data. The study identified that novel machine learning models can be used to accurately predict METs, with 90% accuracy. The models showed a preference towards the dominant wrist or ankle as the movement in those positions were more consistent during PA. It was evident that machine learning models using these locations can be effectively used to accurately predict METs for PA in children.

[1]  Rebecca W. Moore,et al.  Reporting accelerometer methods in physical activity intervention studies: a systematic review and recommendations for authors , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[2]  Derek M. Peters,et al.  Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  David F Stodden,et al.  New insight for activity intensity relativity, metabolic expenditure during object projection skill performance , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[4]  Bradford S. Westgate,et al.  Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer. , 2018, Journal of applied physiology.

[5]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Some suggestions for measuring predictive performance , 1981, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[6]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[7]  V. Stiles,et al.  Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Karin A Pfeiffer,et al.  Energy Expenditure Prediction Using Raw Accelerometer Data in Simulated Free Living. , 2015, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  Michael J. Duncan,et al.  Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5–8 years old , 2016, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[10]  A. Okely,et al.  Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2013, Pediatrics.

[11]  John Gormley,et al.  An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors , 2013, European journal of sport science.

[12]  Gaynor Parfitt,et al.  Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[13]  C. Williams,et al.  Cardiac Autonomic Function, Cardiovascular Risk and Physical Activity in Adolescents , 2017, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  Michael J. Duncan,et al.  Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children , 2017, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[15]  David A. Boas,et al.  The effect of color priming on infant brain and behavior , 2014, NeuroImage.

[16]  Michael J. Duncan,et al.  Estimating Physical Activity in Children Aged 8–11 Years Using Accelerometry: Contributions From Fundamental Movement Skills and Different Accelerometer Placements , 2019, Front. Physiol..

[17]  Shrikant I Bangdiwala,et al.  Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Kate Ridley,et al.  Energy Cost of Free-Play Activities in 10- to 11-Year-Old Children. , 2016, Journal of physical activity & health.

[19]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Kenneth Meijer,et al.  Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[21]  James M. Pivarnik,et al.  Validation and Comparison of Accelerometers Worn on the Hip, Thigh, and Wrists for Measuring Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior , 2016, AIMS public health.

[22]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Energy cost of common activities in children and adolescents. , 2013, Journal of physical activity & health.

[23]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Estimating physical activity in youth using an ankle accelerometer , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.