The application of electromagnetic techniques to groundwater recharge investigations

Abstract The use of electrical methods for estimating spatial patterns of groundwater recharge was evaluated at a field site in southeastern Australia. Here, recharge increased from less than 0.2 mm year −1 under native Eucalyptus vegetation, to between 1 and 14 mm year −1 under dryland agriculture. This increase in recharge results in progressive leaching of salts in the soil profile. Differences in recharge can be estimated from differences in depth of leaching. The estimated recharge rates are correlated with soil texture, with higher recharge rates generally occurring through sandier soils. The relationships of recharge to salt content and soil texture both contribute to lower apparent electrical conductivities for higher recharge rates. The effect of recharge rate on measured apparent electrical conductivities was modelled for various geophysical devices (including frequency-domain (FEM) and time-domain (TEM) electromagnetic instruments and direct current resistivity). The soil-texture effect was shown to have a greater effect than the solute leaching effect in determining the correlation between recharge and apparent electrical conductivity. Analysis of sensitivity to geological noise showed that variations in soil type below 2 m could disguise any correlation. Correlations between recharge rate, measured at core sites from chloride tracer techniques, and apparent electrical conductivity, measured with FEM electromagnetic devices, supported the conclusions of the model. For DC resistivity and TEM methods, correlations between recharge and apparent electrical conductivity were not significant, although for resistivity this may be due partly to the small number of measurements made. The FEM device most sensitive to variations in recharge had an operating frequency of 9.8 kHz. At lower frequencies the sensitivity is reduced, as the instruments are sensing too deeply. The poor correlations for TEM, as compared with FEM, are due probably to the relatively deeper penetration of the TEM instrument used in the study, rather than any inherent differences between the techniques. Because the major reason for the correlation between recharge and apparent electrical conductivity is soil texture, in this area the geophysical devices are mostly mapping soil type.

[1]  J. Rhoades Predicting Bulk Soil Electrical Conductivity versus Saturation Paste Extract Electrical Conductivity Calibrations from Soil Properties1 , 1981 .

[2]  D. R. Cameron,et al.  MAPPING SALINITY USING RESISTIVITY AND ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTIVE TECHNIQUES , 1981 .

[3]  A. Nadler,et al.  Determination of soil solution electrical conductivity from bulk soil electrical conductivity measurements by the four-electrode method. , 1980 .

[4]  Peter J. Shouse,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity and Soil Salinity: New Formulations and Calibrations , 1989 .

[5]  G. C. Baker,et al.  An electromagnetic induction technique for reconnaissance surveys of soil salinity hazards , 1982 .

[6]  R. Nulsen,et al.  The potential of agronomic manipulation for controlling salinity in Western Australia. , 1982 .

[7]  H. L. Penman Gas and vapour movements in the soil: I. The diffusion of vapours through porous solids , 1940, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[8]  P. Cook,et al.  Simultaneous water and solute movement through an unsaturated soil following an increase in recharge , 1989 .

[9]  Glen R. Walker,et al.  Land clearance and river salinisation in the western Murray Basin, Australia , 1990 .

[10]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Groundwater recharge in arid regions: Review and critique of estimation methods , 1988 .

[11]  J. Rhoades,et al.  Effect of Exchangeable Sodium Percentage, Cation Exchange Capacity, and Soil Solution Concentration on Soil Electrical Conductivity , 1980 .

[12]  P. Cook,et al.  A new chloride leaching approach to the estimation of diffuse recharge following a change in land use , 1991 .

[13]  G. Buselli,et al.  SIROTEM: A New Portable Instrument for Multichannel Transient Electromagnetic Measurements , 1977 .

[14]  Jerry J. Sweeney Comparison of Electrical Resistivity Methods for Investigation of Ground Water Conditions at a Landfill Site , 1984 .

[15]  P. Cook,et al.  The calibration of frequency-domain electromagnetic induction meters and their possible use in recharge studies , 1989 .

[16]  P. F. Southwick,et al.  Electrical Conductance of Porous Plugs - Ion Exchange Resin-Solution Systems , 1955 .