A quantitative assessment of a terrestrial biosphere model's data needs across North American biomes

Terrestrial biosphere models are designed to synthesize our current understanding of how ecosystems function, test competing hypotheses of ecosystem function against observations, and predict responses to novel conditions such as those expected under climate change. Reducing uncertainties in such models can improve both basic scientific understanding and our predictive capacity, but rarely are ecosystem models employed in the design of field campaigns. We provide a synthesis of carbon cycle uncertainty analyses conducted using the Predictive Ecosystem Analyzer ecoinformatics workflow with the Ecosystem Demography model v2. This work is a synthesis of multiple projects, using Bayesian data assimilation techniques to incorporate field data and trait databases across temperate forests, grasslands, agriculture, short rotation forestry, boreal forests, and tundra. We report on a number of data needs that span a wide array of diverse biomes, such as the need for better constraint on growth respiration, mortality, stomatal conductance, and water uptake. We also identify data needs that are biome specific, such as photosynthetic quantum efficiency at high latitudes. We recommend that future data collection efforts balance the bias of past measurements toward aboveground processes in temperate biomes with the sensitivities of different processes as represented by ecosystem models. ©2014. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

[1]  R. Vargas,et al.  Nonstructural carbon in woody plants. , 2014, Annual review of plant biology.

[2]  Rob Kooper,et al.  On improving the communication between models and data. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[3]  David M Rosenthal,et al.  Modelling C₃ photosynthesis from the chloroplast to the ecosystem. , 2013, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  Dan Wang,et al.  Predicting yields of short-rotation hybrid poplar (Populus spp.) for the United States through model-data synthesis. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Forest water use and water use efficiency at elevated CO2: a model‐data intercomparison at two contrasting temperate forest FACE sites , 2013, Global change biology.

[6]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  Facilitating feedbacks between field measurements and ecosystem models , 2013 .

[7]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution , 2013 .

[8]  Carl C. Davidson,et al.  The modeled effects of fire on carbon balance and vegetation abundance in Alaskan tundra , 2012 .

[9]  E. Davidson,et al.  Using model‐data fusion to interpret past trends, and quantify uncertainties in future projections, of terrestrial ecosystem carbon cycling , 2012 .

[10]  Daniel M. Kashian,et al.  Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada , 2012 .

[11]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  Leaf optical properties reflect variation in photosynthetic metabolism and its sensitivity to temperature , 2011, Journal of experimental botany.

[12]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  Spectroscopy of canopy chemicals in humid tropical forests , 2011 .

[13]  Andrew E. Suyker,et al.  Characterizing the performance of ecosystem models across time scales: A spectral analysis of the North American Carbon Program site-level synthesis , 2011, Journal of Geophysical Research.

[14]  Han Y. H. Chen,et al.  Competition, species interaction and ageing control tree mortality in boreal forests , 2011 .

[15]  P. Moorcroft,et al.  Tree mortality in the eastern and central United States: patterns and drivers , 2011 .

[16]  Stephen Porder,et al.  Relationships among net primary productivity, nutrients and climate in tropical rain forest: a pan-tropical analysis. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[17]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[18]  Nathan G. McDowell,et al.  Update on Mechanisms of Vegetation Mortality Mechanisms Linking Drought , Hydraulics , Carbon Metabolism , and Vegetation Mortality 1 [ W ] , 2011 .

[19]  J. Sperry Hydraulics of Vascular Water Transport , 2011 .

[20]  D. Coomes,et al.  Influences of Forest Structure, Climate and Species Composition on Tree Mortality across the Eastern US , 2010, PloS one.

[21]  T. A. Black,et al.  A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2010 .

[22]  F. Woodward,et al.  Assessing uncertainties in a second-generation dynamic vegetation model caused by ecological scale limitations. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[23]  N. McDowell,et al.  The mechanisms of carbon starvation: how, when, or does it even occur at all? , 2010, The New phytologist.

[24]  A. Sala,et al.  Physiological mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[25]  D. Randall,et al.  Role of deep soil moisture in modulating climate in the Amazon rainforest , 2010 .

[26]  N. McDowell,et al.  A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests , 2010 .

[27]  Christian Fritz,et al.  Prediction of delta(13)C and delta(15)N in plant tissues with near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[28]  Michael E. Schaepman,et al.  Retrieval of foliar information about plant pigment systems from high resolution spectroscopy , 2009 .

[29]  M. Dietze,et al.  A Predictive Framework to Understand Forest Responses to Global Change , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Mechanistic scaling of ecosystem function and dynamics in space and time: Ecosystem Demography model version 2 , 2009 .

[31]  A. Taylor,et al.  Widespread Increase of Tree Mortality Rates in the Western United States , 2009, Science.

[32]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer by Andrea Saltelli, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola , 2008 .

[33]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Towards quantifying uncertainty in predictions of Amazon ‘dieback’ , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  CO2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database , 2007 .

[35]  A. Saltelli,et al.  The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling , 2007 .

[36]  S. Long,et al.  Long-term growth of soybean at elevated [CO2] does not cause acclimation of stomatal conductance under fully open-air conditions. , 2006, Plant, cell & environment.

[37]  L. White,et al.  Probabilistic inversion of a terrestrial ecosystem model: Analysis of uncertainty in parameter estimation and model prediction , 2006 .

[38]  David D. Parrish,et al.  NORTH AMERICAN REGIONAL REANALYSIS , 2006 .

[39]  Tod A. Laursen,et al.  Finite element tree crown hydrodynamics model (FETCH) using porous media flow within branching elements: A new representation of tree hydrodynamics , 2005 .

[40]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Effects of parameter uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics , 2005 .

[41]  Robert Clement,et al.  On the validation of models of forest CO2 exchange using eddy covariance data: some perils and pitfalls. , 2005, Tree physiology.

[42]  R. Betts,et al.  Amazonian forest dieback under climate-carbon cycle projections for the 21st century , 2004 .

[43]  J. Berry,et al.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species , 1980, Planta.

[44]  Jane R. Foster,et al.  Application of imaging spectroscopy to mapping canopy nitrogen in the forests of the central Appalachian Mountains using Hyperion and AVIRIS , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[45]  D. Baldocchi Assessing the eddy covariance technique for evaluating carbon dioxide exchange rates of ecosystems: past, present and future , 2003 .

[46]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests , 2002 .

[47]  Douglas E. Ahl,et al.  Tree species effects on stand transpiration in northern Wisconsin , 2002 .

[48]  Julian I. Schroeder,et al.  Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants , 2001, Nature.

[49]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Root water uptake and transport: using physiological processes in global predictions. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[50]  J. Amthor The McCree-de Wit-Penning de Vries-Thornley Respiration Paradigms: 30 Years Later , 2000 .

[51]  Roger A. Pielke,et al.  Coupled Atmosphere–Biophysics–Hydrology Models for Environmental Modeling , 2000 .

[52]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME–BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls , 2000 .

[53]  J. H. M. Thornley,et al.  Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Some Guiding Principles , 2000 .

[54]  M. Cannell,et al.  Modelling the Components of Plant Respiration: Representation and Realism , 2000 .

[55]  Nathan Phillips,et al.  Survey and synthesis of intra‐ and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit , 1999 .

[56]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[57]  W. Parton,et al.  TERRESTRIAL NPP: TOWARD A CONSISTENT DATA SET FORGLOBAL MODEL EVALUATION , 1999 .

[58]  Stephen W. Pacala,et al.  LINEAR ANALYSIS OF SOIL DECOMPOSITION: INSIGHTS FROM THE CENTURY MODEL , 1998 .

[59]  Mary E. Martin,et al.  HIGH SPECTRAL RESOLUTION REMOTE SENSING OF FOREST CANOPY LIGNIN, NITROGEN, AND ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES , 1997 .

[60]  R. Hilborn,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1997 .

[61]  Anthony W. King,et al.  The Potential Response of Terrestrial Carbon Storage to Changes in Climate and Atmospheric CO2 , 1997 .

[62]  J. Silvertown,et al.  Life history variation in plants: an exploration of the fast-slow continuum hypothesis , 1996 .

[63]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[64]  Harvey M. Wagner,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis , 1995, Oper. Res..

[65]  R. Leuning A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal‐photosynthesis model for C3 plants , 1995 .

[66]  G. Collatz,et al.  Coupled Photosynthesis-Stomatal Conductance Model for Leaves of C4 Plants , 1992 .

[67]  H. H. Laar,et al.  Products, requirements and efficiency of biosynthesis: a quantitative approach. , 1974, Journal of theoretical biology.

[68]  M. P.R.,et al.  A METHOD FOR SCALING VEGETATION DYNAMICS: THE ECOSYSTEM DEMOGRAPHY MODEL (ED) , 2022 .