The affect heuristic, mortality salience, and risk: domain-specific effects of a natural disaster on risk-benefit perception.

We examine how affect and accessible thoughts following a major natural disaster influence everyday risk perception. A survey was conducted in the months following the 2004 south Asian Tsunami in a representative sample of the Swedish population (N = 733). Respondents rated their experienced affect as well as the perceived risk and benefits of various everyday decision domains. Affect influenced risk and benefit perception in a way that could be predicted from both the affect-congruency and affect heuristic literatures (increased risk perception and stronger risk-benefit correlations). However, in some decision domains, self-regulation goals primed by the natural disaster predicted risk and benefit ratings. Together, these results show that affect, accessible thoughts and motivational states influence perceptions of risks and benefits.

[1]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Affect, Moral Intuition, and Risk , 2010 .

[2]  P. Slovic,et al.  Affect and decision making: A hot topic , 2006 .

[3]  Sandro Galea,et al.  Sustained increased consumption of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana among Manhattan residents after september 11, 2001. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[4]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[5]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Goals Change When Life's Fragility is Primed: Lessons Learned From Older Adults, the September 11 Attacks and Sars , 2006 .

[6]  L. Carstensen,et al.  Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[7]  J. Gross.  The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 1998 .

[8]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[9]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The measurement of core affect: a Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex. , 2002, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[10]  Deborah A. Small,et al.  Recent EFFECTS OF FEAR AND ANGER ON PERCEIVED RISKS OF TERRORISMA National Field Experiment , 2015 .

[11]  S. Heine,et al.  Terror Management and Marketing: He Who Dies With the Most Toys Wins , 1999 .

[12]  Eduardo B. Andrade.  Behavioral Consequences of Affect: Combining Evaluative and Regulatory Mechanisms , 2005 .

[13]  Laura D. Scherer,et al.  Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: revisiting the "affect-free" claim of terror management research. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  Affect, risk perception and future optimism after the tsunami disaster , 2008, Judgment and Decision Making.

[15]  Ellen Peters,et al.  The Construction of Preference: The Functions of Affect in the Construction of Preferences , 2006 .

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Affect, Generalization, and the Perception of Risk. , 1983 .

[17]  J. Greenberg,et al.  Suppression, accessibility of death-related thoughts, and cultural worldview defense: exploring the psychodynamics of terror management. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  L. Carstensen.  The Influence of a Sense of Time on Human Development , 2006, Science.

[19]  F. Norris,et al.  60,000 Disaster Victims Speak: Part I. An Empirical Review of the Empirical Literature, 1981—2001 , 2002, Psychiatry.

[20]  J. Arndt,et al.  The implications of death for health: a terror management health model for behavioral health promotion. , 2008, Psychological review.

[21]  J. Greenberg,et al.  A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. , 1999, Psychological review.

[22]  M. Zeidner,et al.  Threat to Life and Risk-Taking Behaviors: A Review of Empirical Findings and Explanatory Models , 2009, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[23]  S. Galea,et al.  Increased use of cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana among Manhattan, New York, residents after the September 11th terrorist attacks. , 2002, American journal of epidemiology.

[24]  Paul Slovic,et al.  The affect heuristic , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[26]  Alison Cook,et al.  Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs: exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[28]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  The Relationships Between Life Satisfaction, Happiness, and Current Mood , 2012 .

[29]  E. Peters,et al.  THE FUNCTIONS OF AFFECT IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF PREFERENCES ( 2006 , 2008 .

[30]  P. Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Affect , 2006 .

[31]  J. Lerner,et al.  Fear, anger, and risk. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Let Us Eat and Drink, for Tomorrow We Shall Die: Effects of Mortality Salience and Self-Esteem on Self-Regulation in Consumer Choice , 2005 .

[33]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect and decision making. , 1993 .

[34]  T. Gärling,et al.  Influences on current mood of eliciting life-satisfaction judgments , 2012 .

[35]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[36]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .