Random versus nonrandom assignment in the evaluation of treatment for cocaine abusers.

: Cocaine-abusing patients randomly assigned to day-hospital or inpatient rehabilitation were compared with patients who self-selected these treatment settings to examine differences in substance use and psychosocial outcomes under experimental and nonexperimental designs. There was little evidence of setting or assignment effects or Setting x Assignment interactions over the 12-month follow-up period. However, Assignment x Time interactions were obtained with 2 measures of cocaine use and measures of family-social and psychiatric problem severity. These interactions indicated greater problem severity at intake among the randomized patients coupled with greater improvements by the 3-month follow-up relative to the nonrandomized patients. Findings suggest that randomized studies of treatment for cocaine abuse may produce somewhat larger estimates of improvement than what is observed in more typical treatment situations.

[1]  K. Carroll,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: a comparison of traditional versus random-effects regression models in the analysis of longitudinal follow-up data from a clinical trial. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  C. P. Hall,et al.  Effectiveness and Costs of Inpatient versus Day Hospital Cocaine Rehabilitation , 1994, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[3]  S D Imber,et al.  Some conceptual and statistical issues in analysis of longitudinal psychiatric data. Application to the NIMH treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program dataset. , 1993, Archives of general psychiatry.

[4]  S A Maisto,et al.  Reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking behavior. , 1979, Behaviour research and therapy.

[5]  J. McKay,et al.  Effect of random versus nonrandom assignment in a comparison of inpatient and day hospital rehabilitation for male alcoholics. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[6]  J. Weisz,et al.  Bridging the gap between laboratory and clinic in child and adolescent psychotherapy. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[7]  M. Drake.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed. rev.) , 1988 .

[8]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[9]  William R. Shadish,et al.  Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: do you get the same answer? , 1996, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  K. Keeley.  Prevention and Treatment of Alcohol Problems: Research Opportunities , 1990 .

[11]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[12]  A T McLellan,et al.  An Improved Diagnostic Evaluation Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients: The Addiction Severity Index , 1980, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[13]  L. Robins,et al.  National Institute of Mental Health Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Its history, characteristics, and validity. , 1981, Archives of general psychiatry.