Observations and modeling of the elastogravity signals preceding direct seismic waves

Gravity gets into the earthquake game Earthquakes generate large movements of mass, which slightly change the gravitational field. Unlike the elastic waves that propagate from the earthquake, the gravity perturbations travel at the speed of light. Vallée et al. have finally observed these gravity perturbations in seismometer records from the great Tohoku earthquake in Japan in 2011. The signal would have allowed an accurate magnitude estimation in minutes, rather than hours, for this catastrophic earthquake. Science, this issue p. 1164 The observation of elastogravity signals provides a much faster method for determining the size of great earthquakes. After an earthquake, the earliest deformation signals are not expected to be carried by the fastest (P) elastic waves but by the speed-of-light changes of the gravitational field. However, these perturbations are weak and, so far, their detection has not been accurate enough to fully understand their origins and to use them for a highly valuable rapid estimate of the earthquake magnitude. We show that gravity perturbations are particularly well observed with broadband seismometers at distances between 1000 and 2000 kilometers from the source of the 2011, moment magnitude 9.1, Tohoku earthquake. We can accurately model them by a new formalism, taking into account both the gravity changes and the gravity-induced motion. These prompt elastogravity signals open the window for minute time-scale magnitude determination for great earthquakes.

[1]  T. Heaton Correspondence: Response of a gravimeter to an instantaneous step in gravity , 2017, Nature Communications.

[2]  D. Shaddock,et al.  Mechanical characterisation of the TorPeDO: a low frequency gravitational force sensor , 2017 .

[3]  Remi Geiger,et al.  Future Gravitational Wave Detectors Based on Atom Interferometry , 2016, 1611.09911.

[4]  M. Barsuglia,et al.  Prompt gravity signal induced by the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake , 2016, Nature Communications.

[5]  J. Harms Transient gravity perturbations from a double-couple in a homogeneous half-space , 2016 .

[6]  Ettore Majorana,et al.  Low-frequency terrestrial tensor gravitational-wave detector , 2016 .

[7]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Rupture characteristics of major and great (Mw  ≥ 7.0) megathrust earthquakes from 1990 to 2015: 1. Source parameter scaling relationships , 2016 .

[8]  M. Barsuglia,et al.  Transient gravity perturbations induced by earthquake rupture , 2015 .

[9]  Anthony Sladen,et al.  A detailed source model for the Mw9.0 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake reconciling geodesy, seismology, and tsunami records , 2014 .

[10]  B. Delouis FMNEAR: Determination of Focal Mechanism and First Estimate of Rupture Directivity Using Near‐Source Records and a Linear Distribution of Point Sources , 2014 .

[11]  M. Vallée Source time function properties indicate a strain drop independent of earthquake depth and magnitude , 2013, Nature Communications.

[12]  Peter Willett,et al.  What is a tutorial , 2013 .

[13]  Göran Ekström,et al.  The global CMT project 2004–2010: Centroid-moment tensors for 13,017 earthquakes , 2012 .

[14]  Geociênicias Japan Meteorological Agency , 2011 .

[15]  Izuru Takewaki,et al.  Preliminary report of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake , 2011 .

[16]  Coseismic gravity changes of the 2011 Tohoku‐Oki earthquake from satellite gravimetry , 2011 .

[17]  Michael Hohensee,et al.  Sources and technology for an atomic gravitational wave interferometric sensor , 2010, 1001.4821.

[18]  M. Vallée,et al.  SCARDEC: a new technique for the rapid determination of seismic moment magnitude, focal mechanism and source time functions for large earthquakes using body‐wave deconvolution , 2011 .

[19]  M. Ando,et al.  Torsion-bar antenna for low-frequency gravitational-wave observations. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[20]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning , 2008 .

[21]  Wenke Sun,et al.  A Network of Superconducting Gravimeters Detects Submicrogal Coseismic Gravity Changes , 2004, Science.

[22]  Edgar R. Canavan,et al.  Three-axis superconducting gravity gradiometer for sensitive gravity experiments , 2002 .

[23]  H. Houston Influence of depth, focal mechanism, and tectonic setting on the shape and duration of earthquake source time functions , 2001 .

[24]  F. Cotton,et al.  Dynamic stress variations due to shear faults in a plane-layered medium , 1997 .

[25]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  Toward real-time estimation of regional moment tensors , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  Shuhei Okubo,et al.  Gravity and potential changes due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992 .

[27]  G. Mueller,et al.  The reflectivity method; a tutorial , 1985 .

[28]  M. Bouchon A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media , 1981 .

[29]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[30]  John H. Woodhouse,et al.  Determination of earthquake source parameters from waveform data for studies of global and regional seismicity , 1981 .

[31]  G. Muller Earth-flattening approximation for body waves derived from geometric ray theory - improvements, corrections and range of applicability , 1976 .

[32]  Lane R. Johnson,et al.  Green'sFunction for Lamb'sProblem , 1974 .

[33]  K. N. Dollman,et al.  - 1 , 1743 .