Genetically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities

The first genetically modified crops and foods to be approved for commercial use in the European Union have prompted intense controversy. Food retailers and processors have been forced to take up the concerns voiced by their customers. New networks of groups have formed to oppose the technology. In response to these pressures, regulators who approved the products have had to reconsider questions they had previously dismissed or officially resolved. Governments have devised more precautionary measures of various kinds. For example, they have increased the burden of evidence for demonstrating safety, have broadened the practical definition of the ‘adverse effects’ which must be prevented, and have devised marketstage precautions for such effects. These extra measures manage the risk debate as well as any risks. In such ways, the technocratic model of European harmonization is being challenged and superseded. This may allow differences in national practices to be viewed as valuable expert resources for a different harmonization model, rather than as deviations from a universal rational norm. Regulatory conflicts offer precautionary opportunities, which could lead to more flexible and democratic procedures. Theoretical perspectives – on risk, uncertainty, precaution, European integration, expertise and the internal market – help illuminate these possibilities.

[1]  G. V. Calster,et al.  The use of voluntary agreements in the European Community's environmental policy , 2001 .

[2]  P. Joly,et al.  France: broadening precautionary expertise? , 2000 .

[3]  Oliver Todt,et al.  Spain: commercialization drives public debate and precaution , 2000 .

[4]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae , 1999, Nature.

[5]  David Wield,et al.  Market stage precautions: managing regulatory disharmonies for transgenic crops in Europe , 1999 .

[6]  Allison A. Snow,et al.  Costs of transgenic herbicide resistance introgressed from Brassica napus into weedy B. rapa , 1999 .

[7]  Andrew Jordan,et al.  The Implementation of EU Environmental Policy; A Policy Problem without a Political Solution? , 1999 .

[8]  X. Reboud,et al.  A multisite-cooperative research programme on risk assessment of transgenic crops , 1999 .

[9]  Martin Chalmers,et al.  Risk Society and the Provident State , 1998 .

[10]  A. Baranger,et al.  Gene flow from transgenic crops , 1997, Nature.

[11]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance , 1997, Journal of Public Policy.

[12]  V. Simonsen,et al.  Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants , 1997, Birkhäuser Basel.

[13]  J. Toft.  Denmark: seeking a broad-based consensus on gene technology , 1996 .

[14]  René von Schomberg,et al.  Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe: harmonisation difficulties, opportunities, dilemmas , 1996 .

[15]  Bernhard Gill.  Germany: splicing genes, splitting society , 1996 .

[16]  Tomas Hellström,et al.  The science-policy dialogue in transformation: model-uncertainty and environmental policy , 1996 .

[17]  R. Jørgensen,et al.  The risk of crop transgene spread , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework , 1995 .

[19]  W. Boyd,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity@@@Risk and Rationality: Philosophical; Foundations for Populist Reforms , 1993 .

[20]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Policy Change And Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach , 1993 .

[21]  R. Rose.  Lesson-drawing in public policy , 1993 .

[22]  J. Postgate,et al.  Gone with the wind , 1993, Nature.

[23]  H Roberts,et al.  Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity , 1994 .

[24]  A. Weale,et al.  Between economy and ecology? The single market and the integration of environmental policy , 1992 .

[25]  D. Judge.  A green dimension for the european community , 1992 .

[26]  B. Wynne.  Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[27]  Gordon Lake.  Scientific uncertainty and political regulation: European legislation on the contained use and deliberate release of genetically modified (micro) organisms , 1991 .

[28]  J. Pelkmans.  The New Approach to Technical Harmonization and Standardization , 1987 .