Screening for oxidative damage by engineered nanomaterials: a comparative evaluation of FRAS and DCFH

Several acellular assays are routinely used to measure oxidative stress elicited by engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), yet little comparative evaluations of such methods exist. This study compares for the first time the performance of the dichlorofluorescein (DCFH) assay which measures reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, to that of the ferric-reducing ability of serum (FRAS) assay, which measures biological oxidant damage in serum. A diverse set of 28 commercially important and extensively characterized ENMs were tested on both the assays. Intracellular oxidative stress was also assessed on a representative subset of seven ENMs in THP-1 (phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate matured human monocytes) cells. Associations between assay responses and ENM physicochemical properties were assessed via correlation and regression analysis. DCFH correlated strongly with FRAS after dose normalization for mass (R2 = 0.78) and surface area (R2 = 0.68). Only 10/28 ENMs were positive in DCFH versus 21/28 in FRAS. Both assays were strongly associated with specific surface area and transition metal content. Qualitatively, a similar response ranking was observed for acellular FRAS and intracellular reduced:oxidized glutathione ratio (GSH:GSSG) in cells. Quantitatively, weak correlation was found between intracellular GSSG and FRAS or DCFH (R2 < 0.25) even after calculating effective dose to cells. The FRAS assay was more sensitive than DCFH, especially for ENMs with low to moderate oxidative damage potential, and may serve as a more biologically relevant substitute for acellular ROS measurements of ENMs. Further in vitro and in vivo validations of FRAS against other toxicological endpoints with larger datasets are recommended.

[1]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Efficacy of Simple Short-Term in Vitro Assays for Predicting the Potential of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles to Cause Pulmonary Inflammation , 2008, Environmental health perspectives.

[2]  Bengt Fadeel,et al.  Close encounters of the small kind: adverse effects of man-made materials interfacing with the nano-cosmos of biological systems. , 2010, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[3]  P. M. Williams,et al.  Confounding experimental considerations in nanogenotoxicology. , 2009, Mutagenesis.

[4]  Abiche H. Dewilde,et al.  Understanding and correcting for carbon nanotube interferences with a commercial LDH cytotoxicity assay. , 2012, Toxicology.

[5]  Eric A. Grulke,et al.  Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Liquids , 2003 .

[6]  Mark R Wiesner,et al.  Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. , 2006, Nano letters.

[7]  Robert H. Hurt,et al.  Iron Bioavailability and Redox Activity in Diverse Carbon Nanotube Samples , 2007 .

[8]  C. Koshland,et al.  Particle-induced artifacts in the MTT and LDH viability assays. , 2012, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  Irfan Rahman,et al.  Assay for quantitative determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide levels using enzymatic recycling method , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[10]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Biological oxidative damage by carbon nanotubes: Fingerprint or footprint? , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[11]  Joel G Pounds,et al.  ISDD: A computational model of particle sedimentation, diffusion and target cell dosimetry for in vitro toxicity studies , 2010, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[12]  M. Bonini,et al.  The oxidation of 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin to reactive oxygen species: a self-fulfilling prophesy? , 2006, Free radical biology & medicine.

[13]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Oxidative Stress as a Screening Metric of Potential Toxicity by Nanoparticles and Ariborne Particulate Matter , 2008 .

[14]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Nanomaterials properties vs. biological oxidative damage: Implications for toxicity screening and exposure assessment , 2009 .

[15]  M. Cronin,et al.  Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. , 2005, Current medicinal chemistry.

[16]  Yang C. Fann,et al.  Phenoxyl Free Radical Formation during the Oxidation of the Fluorescent Dye 2′,7′-Dichlorofluorescein by Horseradish Peroxidase , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  T. Sandström,et al.  Adverse cardiovascular effects of air pollution , 2009, Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine.

[18]  A. Moosavi-Movahedi,et al.  Effect of Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Cu2+ on horseradish peroxidase , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[19]  E. Teller,et al.  ADSORPTION OF GASES IN MULTIMOLECULAR LAYERS , 1938 .

[20]  J. Joseph,et al.  Quantifying cellular oxidative stress by dichlorofluorescein assay using microplate reader. , 1999, Free radical biology & medicine.

[21]  Saji George,et al.  A predictive toxicological paradigm for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. , 2009, ACS nano.

[22]  R. Harrison,et al.  Evaluating the Toxicity of Airborne Particulate Matter and Nanoparticles by Measuring Oxidative Stress Potential — A Workshop Report and Consensus Statement , 2008 .

[23]  Nastassja A. Lewinski,et al.  Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles. , 2008, Small.

[24]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. , 2013, Accounts of chemical research.

[25]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Screening for Oxidative Stress Elicited by Engineered Nanomaterials: Evaluation of Acellular DCFH Assay , 2012, Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society.

[26]  April Z Gu,et al.  A new Transcriptional Effect Level Index (TELI) for toxicogenomics-based toxicity assessment. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  Conrad Coester,et al.  Particle and Fibre Toxicology BioMed Central Methodology , 2008 .

[28]  J. Martens,et al.  Oxidative stress and proinflammatory effects of carbon black and titanium dioxide nanoparticles: role of particle surface area and internalized amount. , 2009, Toxicology.

[29]  Charles L Geraci,et al.  Issues in the Development of Epidemiologic Studies of Workers Exposed to Engineered Nanoparticles , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[30]  Roel P F Schins,et al.  Oxidant generation by particulate matter: from biologically effective dose to a promising, novel metric , 2006, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[31]  K. Dawson,et al.  Characterisation of nanoparticle size and state prior to nanotoxicological studies , 2010 .

[32]  B. Nemery,et al.  Intracellular oxidative stress caused by nanoparticles: What do we measure with the dichlorofluorescein assay? , 2013 .

[33]  P. Biswas,et al.  Concept of Assessing Nanoparticle Hazards Considering Nanoparticle Dosemetric and Chemical/Biological Response Metrics , 2010, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[34]  Takahiro Kobayashi,et al.  Chemical and biological oxidative effects of carbon black nanoparticles. , 2006, Chemosphere.

[35]  T. Xia,et al.  Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel , 2006, Science.

[36]  R. Mason,et al.  Evidence for free radical formation during the oxidation of 2'-7'-dichlorofluorescin to the fluorescent dye 2'-7'-dichlorofluorescein by horseradish peroxidase: possible implications for oxidative stress measurements. , 1999, Free radical biology & medicine.

[37]  Xiuping Chen,et al.  2′,7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein as a fluorescent probe for reactive oxygen species measurement: Forty years of application and controversy , 2010, Free radical research.

[38]  Vicki Stone,et al.  Relating the physicochemical characteristics and dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes in different suspension media to their oxidative reactivity in vitro and inflammation in vivo , 2010, Nanotoxicology.

[39]  Ravi S Kane,et al.  Structure and function of enzymes adsorbed onto single-walled carbon nanotubes. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[40]  V. C. Moore,et al.  Individually suspended single-walled carbon nanotubes in various surfactants , 2003 .

[41]  W. MacNee,et al.  Combustion-derived nanoparticles: A review of their toxicology following inhalation exposure , 2005, Particle and Fibre Toxicology.

[42]  Dhimiter Bello,et al.  Mapping the biological oxidative damage of engineered nanomaterials. , 2013, Small.

[43]  Michael Riediker,et al.  Nanoparticle reactivity toward dithiothreitol , 2008 .

[44]  Philip Demokritou,et al.  Interactions of engineered nanomaterials in physiological media and implications for in vitro dosimetry , 2013, Nanotoxicology.

[45]  T. Xia,et al.  Potential health impact of nanoparticles. , 2009, Annual review of public health.

[46]  Jonathan S Dordick,et al.  Silica nanoparticle size influences the structure and enzymatic activity of adsorbed lysozyme. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[47]  M. Lekka,et al.  Photocatalytic and phototoxic properties of TiO2-based nanofilaments: ESR and AFM assays , 2012, Nanotoxicology.

[48]  Edgar Muñoz,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of thin films of single-walled carbon nanotube bundles on flexible plastic substrates. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  David M. Brown,et al.  Measurement of reactive species production by nanoparticles prepared in biologically relevant media. , 2007, Toxicology letters.

[50]  Chao Liu,et al.  Comparative study of cytotoxicity, oxidative stress and genotoxicity induced by four typical nanomaterials: the role of particle size, shape and composition , 2009, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.