Joint gap assessment with a tensor is useful for the selection of insert thickness in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND The success of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty relies on a lot of factors such as correct osteotomy and proper soft-tissue tensioning. A selection of insert thickness depends solely on the surgeon's subjective feeling. Recently, a tensor that is designed to assess soft tissue balance during unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has been developed. The purpose of this study was to compare the component gap throughout the range of motion among different distraction forces and examine the correlation between the component gap and the insert thickness. METHODS 30 cases of 29 patients were included. All the patients received a conventional medial Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System. Using a tensor under 10, 20, 30, and 40 lb distraction forces, after femoral component placement, the component gaps were assessed throughout the range of motion. The correlations between the component gap and the insert thickness selected were examined. FINDINGS The component gap showed the same kinematic pattern among the different distraction forces and the value increased in proportion to the increase of the distraction force in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The insert thickness in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty was found to have a strong positive correlation with the component gap from 10 to 45° of knee flexion with a distraction force of more than 20 lb INTERPRETATION With the use of the tensor, surgeons can quantify the component gap and objectify their insert thickness decision compared with the use of tension gauge.

[1]  Richard D Komistek,et al.  In vivo determination of kinematics for subjects having a Zimmer Unicompartmental High Flex Knee System. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  C T Laurencin,et al.  Unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patient , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  P. Hernigou,et al.  Alignment Influences Wear in the Knee after Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  D. Fisher,et al.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. , 2009, Orthopedics.

[5]  Jess H Lonner,et al.  Indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and rationale for robotic arm-assisted technology. , 2009, American journal of orthopedics.

[6]  Yoshinori Kadoya,et al.  Preparation of the flexion gap affects the extension gap in total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[7]  Gerard A Engh,et al.  Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  Yuji Morita,et al.  Joint Gap Changes with Patellar Tendon Strain and Patellar Position During TKA , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  Song Lee,et al.  Unicompartmental versus Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patient , 2008 .

[10]  L Marmor,et al.  Marmor modular knee in unicompartmental disease. Minimum four-year follow-up. , 1979, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  L. Whiteside,et al.  Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. , 2005, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[12]  Takehiko Matsushita,et al.  Soft tissue tension in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  D. Ammeen,et al.  The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  A. Amin,et al.  Unicompartmental or Total Knee Arthroplasty?: Results from a Matched Study , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  M. McGarry,et al.  Biomechanical effects of patellar positioning on intraoperative knee joint gap measurement in total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  Ryosuke Kuroda,et al.  Femoral component placement changes soft tissue balance in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[17]  Shinichi Yoshiya,et al.  Joint gap kinematics in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty measured by a new tensor with the navigation system. , 2006, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  W. Mihalko,et al.  Comparison of Ligament-Balancing Techniques During Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  Kathrin Sekyra,et al.  Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[20]  Michael A Conditt,et al.  Minimally invasive robotic-arm-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  Ryosuke Kuroda,et al.  Intra-operative joint gap kinematics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. , 2013, Clinical biomechanics.