How differences in eWOM platforms impact consumers’ perceptions and decision-making

ABSTRACT This article aims to examine the effects of different features of various eWOM (electronic word-of-mouth) platforms on consumers’ perceived credibility of eWOM regarding the product-related risks. Based on the stimuli–organism–response (S–O–R) theory, this study establishes a model to explore the relationships among eWOM platforms, tie strength, social cues, and perceived eWOM credibility. A mixed design of 2 (eWOM platforms) × 2 (product-related risks) conditions experiment and a survey method is applied to verify the model. The results show that tie strength between eWOM publishers and recipients positively influences the perceived eWOM credibility. The volume of social cues in eWOM platforms positively influences the perceived credibility of a female, while the opposite is true for a male. Both tie strength and volume of social cues in social media are greater than those in e-commerce websites. For products with low risks, eWOM in e-commerce websites is perceived to be more credible. Findings implicate that interactive functions should be added to the product comment area to enhance communications between the reviewers and potential consumers. Findings also encourage the cooperation between e-commerce websites and social media and suggest that managers should develop proper strategies in different situations.

[1]  Lene Pettersen.  Rating mechanisms among participants in sharing economy platforms , 2017, First Monday.

[2]  Sarah Spiekermann,et al.  SOCIAL NETWORKS : WHY WE DISCLOSE , 2012 .

[3]  Jianan Wu,et al.  The role of online seller reviews and product price on buyers' willingness-to-pay: a risk perspective , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  John W. Payne,et al.  Effort and Accuracy in Choice , 1985 .

[5]  Dong Liu,et al.  Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  K. Goh,et al.  Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content , 2013 .

[7]  Perry R. Hinton.  SPSS Explained , 2004 .

[8]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[9]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Unveiling user-generated content: Designing websites to best present customer reviews , 2011 .

[10]  R. L. Archer,et al.  Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. , 1983 .

[11]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  The impact of online store environment cues on purchase intention: Trust and perceived risk as a mediator , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[12]  P. Chatterjee,et al.  Online Reviews: Do Consumers Use Them? , 2006 .

[13]  J. Bettman.  An information processing theory of consumer choice , 1979 .

[14]  Rui Duan,et al.  Identifying effective influencers based on trust for electronic word-of-mouth marketing: A domain-aware approach , 2015, Inf. Sci..

[15]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: a trust building model , 2002, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Dimple R. Thadani,et al.  The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[17]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  The influence of store environment on quality inferences and store image , 1994 .

[18]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Elmira Djafarova,et al.  Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  J. Chiou,et al.  How Much can you Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information , 2011 .

[21]  P. Cozby.  Self-disclosure: a literature review. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Dan Sarel,et al.  Comparative Advertising Effectiveness: The Role of Involvement and Source Credibility , 1991 .

[23]  R. Staelin,et al.  A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity , 1994 .

[24]  Yu-Hui Fang,et al.  Beyond the Credibility of Electronic Word of Mouth: Exploring eWOM Adoption on Social Networking Sites from Affective and Curiosity Perspectives , 2014, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[25]  Pranjal Gupta,et al.  How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective , 2010 .

[26]  Min-Sook Park,et al.  The Effect of Online Social Network Characteristics on Consumer Purchasing Intention of Social Deals , 2014 .

[27]  Wu He,et al.  Comparing consumer-produced product reviews across multiple websites with sentiment classification , 2018, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[28]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[29]  Bo Sophia Xiao,et al.  Do actions speak louder than voices? The signaling role of social information cues in influencing consumer purchase decisions , 2014, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  The Impact of Word of Mouth Sources on the Perceived Usefulness of an Innovation , 2013 .

[31]  Jyun-Cheng Wang,et al.  How online social ties and product-related risks influence purchase intentions: A Facebook experiment , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[32]  R. Donovan.  Store atmosphere and purchasing behavior , 1994 .

[33]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Nada Nasr Bechwati,et al.  Word of Mouse , 2008 .

[35]  Wonjoon Kim,et al.  Do product reviews really reduce search costs? , 2017, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[36]  Mira Lee,et al.  Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) , 2009 .

[37]  Zheng Xiang,et al.  Personal Profile Information as Cues of Credibility in Online Travel Reviews , 2013, ENTER.

[38]  Jian Tang,et al.  Categorizing consumer behavioral responses and artifact design features: The case of online advertising , 2014, Information Systems Frontiers.

[39]  Namkee Park,et al.  Effects of self-disclosure on relational intimacy in Facebook , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Jonah A. Berger.  Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research , 2014 .

[41]  H. Yun,et al.  The Relationship between High-Tech Product WOM Information Characteristics and WOM Effectiveness under SNS Environment , 2016 .

[42]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[43]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[44]  Muhammad Imran Malik,et al.  Online word-of-mouth antecedents, attitude and intention-to-purchase electronic products in Pakistan , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[45]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[46]  Chi-Lun Liu.  The impact of social cues and effectiveness in check-in advertising , 2014, Kybernetes.

[47]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[48]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  Revisiting the digital divide in Canada: the impact of demographic factors on access to the internet, level of online activity, and social networking site usage , 2014 .

[49]  Julia E. Blose,et al.  Believe it or not: Credibility of blogs in tourism , 2008 .

[50]  Yu-Hui Fang,et al.  Does online interactivity matter? Exploring the role of interactivity strategies in consumer decision making , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[51]  Nancy K. Baym,et al.  Personal Connections in the Digital Age , 1994 .

[52]  Khim-Yong Goh,et al.  Social Media Brand Community and Consumer Behavior: Quantifying the Relative Impact of User- and Marketer-Generated Content , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Carolyn A. Lin,et al.  Predicting the effects of eWOM and online brand messaging: Source trust, bandwagon effect and innovation adoption factors , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[54]  Qian Xu,et al.  Should I trust him? The effects of reviewer profile characteristics on eWOM credibility , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[55]  Ana María Munar,et al.  Trust and Involvement in Tourism Social Media and Web-Based Travel Information Sources , 2013 .

[56]  M. Gilly,et al.  A dyadic study of interpersonal information search , 1998 .

[57]  J. Jacoby.  Stimulus-Organism-Response Reconsidered: An Evolutionary Step in Modeling (Consumer) Behavior , 2002 .

[58]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Ads promoting OTC medications: The effect of ad format and credibility on beliefs, attitudes, and purchase intentions , 1997 .

[59]  Lingli Wang,et al.  E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt? , 2016, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[60]  Byeong-Joon Moon,et al.  The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: Moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type , 2003 .

[61]  Lenita M. Davis,et al.  Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses , 2003 .

[62]  Facebook is no " Great equalizer " : A big data approach to gender differences in civic engagement across , 2015 .

[63]  Essi Pöyry,et al.  Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage , 2013, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[64]  Pradeep Racherla,et al.  Perceived 'usefulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[65]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Factors of Information Credibility for an Internet Advice Site , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[66]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[67]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[68]  Dong-Mo Koo,et al.  Impact of tie strength and experience on the effectiveness of online service recommendations , 2016, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[69]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Informational influence of online customer feedback: An empirical study , 2010 .

[70]  J. Russell,et al.  The Basic Emotional Impact of Environments , 1974, Perceptual and motor skills.

[71]  Lenita M. Davis,et al.  Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications , 2001 .

[72]  Ricardo Colomo Palacios,et al.  The effect of information overload and disorganisation on intention to purchase online: The role of perceived risk and internet experience , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[73]  R. Bagozzi.  Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: A Comment , 1981 .

[74]  Stephen Burgess,et al.  The Role of User-Generated Content in Tourists' Travel Planning Behavior , 2009 .

[75]  L. Miller,et al.  Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[76]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  The Impact of Positive Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumer Online Purchasing Decision , 2009, WSKS.

[77]  Fred Bronner,et al.  Social media and consumer choice , 2014 .

[78]  Nicholas David Bowman,et al.  How demanding is social media: Understanding social media diets as a function of perceived costs and benefits - A rational actor perspective , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[79]  Yunjae Cheong,et al.  User-generated product reviews on the internet: the drivers and outcomes of the perceived usefulness of product reviews , 2017 .

[80]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[81]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[82]  Rebecca Walker Naylor,et al.  Beyond the “Like” Button: The Impact of Mere Virtual Presence on Brand Evaluations and Purchase Intentions in Social Media Settings , 2012 .

[83]  V. Vieira.  Stimuli–organism-response framework: A meta-analytic review in the store environment , 2013 .

[84]  M. S. Cunningham.  The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk , 1967 .

[85]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Digitization of Word-of-Mouth: Promise and Challenges of Online Feedback Mechanisms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[86]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  What motivates customers to participate in social commerce? The impact of technological environments and virtual customer experiences , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[87]  Yi-Wen Fan,et al.  Establishing the Adoption of Electronic Word-of-Mouth through Consumers' Perceived Credibility , 2013 .

[88]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[89]  Chris Evans,et al.  The influence of eWOM in social media on consumers' purchase intentions: An extended approach to information adoption , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[90]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Involvement and Decision-Making Performance with a Decision Aid: The Influence of Social Multimedia, Gender, and Playfulness , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[91]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Facebook is no źGreat equalizerź , 2017 .

[92]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[93]  Dan J. Kim,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2019 .

[94]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  How Consumers Evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) Messages , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[95]  S. Beatty,et al.  External Search Effort: An Investigation across Several Product Categories , 1987 .

[96]  J. Dijck.  The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media , 2013 .

[97]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[98]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  The Influence of Sex Roles on Judgment , 1988 .

[99]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[100]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[101]  Mohammad Salehan,et al.  A Unified Model for the Adoption of Electronic Word of Mouth on Social Network Sites: Facebook as the Exemplar , 2018, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[102]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word of Mouth via Online Consumer Reviews , 2008, ECIS.

[103]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[104]  Yi-Cheng Ku,et al.  Personalized Content Recommendation and User Satisfaction: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Findings , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[105]  Ana María Munar,et al.  Digital Exhibitionism The Age of Exposure , 2010 .

[106]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[107]  Michael R. Hyman,et al.  E-Tail Atmospherics: A Critique of the Literature and Model Extension , 2004, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[108]  Ling Liu,et al.  Understanding Chinese users’ continuance intention toward online social networks: an integrative theoretical model , 2013, Electronic Markets.

[109]  Shu-Chuan Chu,et al.  Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites , 2011 .

[110]  Joe Phua,et al.  Following Celebrities’ Tweets About Brands: The Impact of Twitter-Based Electronic Word-of-Mouth on Consumers’ Source Credibility Perception, Buying Intention, and Social Identification With Celebrities , 2014 .

[111]  Erin M. Steffes,et al.  Social ties and online word of mouth , 2009, Internet Res..

[112]  Y. Trope,et al.  Interpersonal Similarity as a Social Distance Dimension: Implications for Perception of Others' Actions. , 2008, Journal of experimental social psychology.