Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction Revisited: A Comparison of Participant–Observer Perspectives

Studies of online environments estimate that the majority of members in online forums do not contribute to ongoing discussions and only observe or “lurk” (e.g., Nonnecke & Preece, 2000). Despite the prevalence of this form of information acquisition, direct comparisons between the experiences of these “observers” (or “lurkers”) and active participants are lacking. The present research draws on previous research examining perceptual differences between participants and observers as well as social information processing theory (Walther, 1992) and reports on three studies examining such differences in computer-mediated communication (CMC). Study 1 examined the effects in the context of interpersonal interaction in synchronous CMC. Study 2 examined the effects in the context of group interaction in both synchronous and asynchronous CMC. Study 3 replicated and extended the results of the previous studies across two time periods. The overall results (a) support the presence of participant–observer differences in CMC, (b) show that the presence of anticipated future interaction moderates said differences, and (c) provide mixed evidence that participant and observer interpretations of relational messages converge over time.

[1]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives , 1991 .

[2]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[3]  G. Gonzales,et al.  Information Technologies , 2019, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[4]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes , 1964 .

[5]  G. Bateson.  Naven , 1958 .

[6]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  The Role of Anticipated Future Interaction, Self-Disclosure, and Perceived Success in Internet Dating , 2006 .

[7]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[8]  Malcolm R. Parks.  Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[9]  J. Seabrook,et al.  Deeper: My Two-Year Odyssey in Cyberspace , 1998 .

[10]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[11]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  Validation and measurement of the fundamental themes of relational communication , 1987 .

[12]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[13]  Jerold L. Hale,et al.  The fundamental topoi of relational communication , 1984 .

[14]  J. Monahan.  Information Processing Differences of Conversational Participants and Observers: The Effects of Self-Presentation Concerns and Cognitive Load. , 1995 .

[15]  Malcolm R. Parks,et al.  Cues Filtered Out, Cues Filtered In: Computer-Mediated Communication and Relationships , 2002 .

[16]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality , 1999 .

[17]  Charles R. Berger,et al.  Interpersonal Communication: Theoretical Perspectives, Future Prospects , 2005 .

[18]  Michael Sunnafrank,et al.  At First Sight: Persistent Relational Effects of Get-Acquainted Conversations , 2004 .

[19]  Kathy Kellermann.  The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction , 1984 .

[20]  E. E. Jones,et al.  Foundations of Social Psychology , 1967 .

[21]  S. Barnes,et al.  Online Connections: Internet Interpersonal Relationships , 2001 .

[22]  K. Douglas,et al.  Identifiability and self-presentation: computer-mediated communication and intergroup interaction. , 2001, The British journal of social psychology.

[23]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Lurker demographics: counting the silent , 2000, CHI.

[24]  J. Ruesch,et al.  Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. , 1967 .

[25]  Tim O'Shea,et al.  'Flaming' in computer-mediated communication: Observations, explanations, implications. , 1992 .

[26]  Artemio Ramirez,et al.  The Effect of Anticipated Future Interaction and Initial Impression Valence on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 2007 .

[27]  C. Erik Timmerman,et al.  E‐mail communication in workplace romantic relationships , 2003 .

[28]  Michael Sunnafrank.  Predicted Outcome Value During Initial Interactions A Reformulation of Uncertainty Reduction Theory , 1986 .

[29]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[30]  D. Solomon,et al.  Structuring the concept of relational communication , 1999 .

[31]  R. Street.  Participant–Observer Differences in Speech Evaluation , 1985 .

[32]  J. Walther.  Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[33]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .

[34]  J. Walther,et al.  Information-Seeking Strategies, Uncertainty, and Computer-Mediated Communication toward a Conceptual Model , 2002 .

[35]  Kenichi Ishii.  Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life , 2006 .

[36]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Ann E. Schlosser.  Posting versus Lurking: Communicating in a Multiple Audience Context , 2005 .

[38]  N. Baym.  Interpersonal Life Online , 2002 .

[39]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Artemio Ramirez, Jr,et al.  When Online Meets Offline: The Effect of Modality Switching on Relational Communication , 2007 .

[41]  Norah E. Dunbar,et al.  Testing the Interactivity Principle: Effects of Mediation, Propinquity, and Verbal and Nonverbal Modalities in Interpersonal Interaction , 2002 .