Relating completely positive divisibility of dynamical maps with compatibility of channels

The role of CP-indivisibility and incompatibility as valuable resources for various information-theoretic tasks is widely acknowledged. This study delves into the intricate relationship between CP-divisibility and channel compatibility. Our investigation focuses on the behaviour of incompatibility robustness of quantum channels for a pair of generic dynamical maps. We show that the incompatibility robustness of channels is monotonically non-increasing for a pair of generic CP-divisible dynamical maps. Further, our explicit study of the behaviour of incompatibility robustness with time for some specific dynamical maps reveals non-monotonic behaviour in the CP-indivisible regime. Additionally, we propose a measure of CP-indivisibility based on the incompatibility robustness of quantum channels. Our investigation provides valuable insights into the nature of quantum dynamical maps and their relevance in information-theoretic applications.

[1]  P. Lahti,et al.  Joint Measurability in Lindbladian Open Quantum Systems , 2023, Open Systems & Information Dynamics.

[2]  D. Saha,et al.  Measurement incompatibility and quantum advantage in communication , 2022, Physical Review A.

[3]  H. Kwon,et al.  Engineering a heat engine purely driven by quantum coherence , 2022, Physical Review A.

[4]  Carlos Palazuelos,et al.  Entanglement and Superposition Are Equivalent Concepts in Any Physical Theory. , 2021, Physical review letters.

[5]  D. Burgarth,et al.  Quantum non-Markovianity elusive to interventions , 2021, Physical Review A.

[6]  O. Gühne,et al.  Kochen-Specker contextuality , 2021, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[7]  C. Duarte,et al.  Relating Compatibility and Divisibility of Quantum Channels , 2021, International Journal of Theoretical Physics.

[8]  F. Buscemi,et al.  Complete Resource Theory of Quantum Incompatibility as Quantum Programmability. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[9]  J. Mori.  Operational characterization of incompatibility of quantum channels with quantum state discrimination , 2019, Physical Review A.

[10]  M. Kim,et al.  Completely Positive Divisibility Does Not Mean Markovianity. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[11]  Ananda G. Maity,et al.  Detecting non-Markovianity via uncertainty relations , 2019, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[12]  D. Cavalcanti,et al.  All Sets of Incompatible Measurements give an Advantage in Quantum State Discrimination. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[13]  G. Gour,et al.  Quantum resource theories , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[14]  C. M. Chandrashekar,et al.  Enhanced non-Markovian behavior in quantum walks with Markovian disorder , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Samyadeb Bhattacharya,et al.  Convex geometry of Markovian Lindblad dynamics and witnessing non-Markovianity , 2018, Quantum Information Processing.

[16]  A. S. Majumdar,et al.  Convex resource theory of non-Markovianity , 2018, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[17]  C. M. Chandrashekar,et al.  Enhanced non-Markovian behavior in quantum walks with Markovian disorder , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[18]  Subhashis Banerjee,et al.  Thermodynamics of non-Markovian reservoirs and heat engines. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[19]  Francesco Petruccione,et al.  Non-Markovian Evolution: a Quantum Walk Perspective , 2017, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[20]  A. Pati,et al.  Dynamics and thermodynamics of a central spin immersed in a spin bath , 2017, 1704.08291.

[21]  Arun Kumar Pati,et al.  Exact master equation for a spin interacting with a spin bath: Non-Markovianity and negative entropy production rate , 2016, 1610.03895.

[22]  Teiko Heinosaari,et al.  Incompatibility of quantum channels , 2016, 1608.01794.

[23]  Teiko Heinosaari,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of two quantum observables: Compatibility, broadcasting, and in-between , 2016, 1604.00775.

[24]  Teiko Heinosaari,et al.  An invitation to quantum incompatibility , 2015, 1511.07548.

[25]  I. D. Vega,et al.  Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantum systems , 2015, 1511.06994.

[26]  Elsi-Mari Laine,et al.  Dynamics of incompatibility of quantum measurements in open systems , 2015, 1508.04612.

[27]  Elsi-Mari Laine,et al.  Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems , 2015, 1505.01385.

[28]  Gerardo Adesso,et al.  Measuring Quantum Coherence with Entanglement. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[29]  S. Maniscalco,et al.  Non-Markovianity and reservoir memory of quantum channels: a quantum information theory perspective , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[30]  Tamás Vértesi,et al.  Joint measurability, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering, and Bell nonlocality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[31]  S. Huelga,et al.  Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection , 2014, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[32]  Joel J. Wallman,et al.  Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation , 2014, Nature.

[33]  Jyrki Piilo,et al.  Nonlocal memory effects allow perfect teleportation with mixed states , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[34]  Li Li,et al.  Canonical form of master equations and characterization of non-Markovianity , 2010, 1009.0845.

[35]  A. Dijkstra,et al.  Non-Markovian entanglement dynamics in the presence of system-bath coherence. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[36]  Jyrki Piilo,et al.  Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes , 2010, 1002.2583.

[37]  Susana F Huelga,et al.  Entanglement and non-markovianity of quantum evolutions. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[38]  G. Compagno,et al.  Non-markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[39]  N. Gisin,et al.  From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[40]  W. Son,et al.  Joint measurements and Bell inequalities , 2005, quant-ph/0509133.

[41]  Shengjun Wu,et al.  What is quantum entanglement , 2003 .

[42]  R. Xu,et al.  Theory of open quantum systems , 2002 .

[43]  K. Lendi,et al.  Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications , 1987 .

[44]  G. Lindblad.  On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups , 1976 .

[45]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N Level Systems , 1976 .

[46]  G. Compagno,et al.  Non-Markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement , 2018 .