High-field MRI of the central nervous system: current approaches to clinical and microscopic imaging.

Introduction of clinical high-field MRI has raised interest in the use of clinical imaging--the efficacy of which has not yet been fully established--in daily practice. A high signal-to-noise ratio and profound susceptibility effects can improve the spatial resolution and image contrast of clinical imaging, whereas the heating effects of the radio frequency tend to prolong acquisition time. As well, inhomogeneities in the static or local magnetic fields can have a negative effect on image quality. The T(1) prolongation may affect T(1) contrast yet improve the enhancement effect of gadolinium chelate and the inflow effect of MR angiography. High-contrast imaging, such as the short inversion-time inversion recovery technique, can provide excellent intra- and extracerebral contrast comparable to microscopic or macroscopic specimens. High-field systems can also be applied to microscopic imaging. High-field MRI is expected to have an increased clinical impact in the near future. Technological advances tailored to high-field systems, as well as the accumulation of scientific evidence, will be necessary to establish its predominance over conventional MRI.

[1]  High-field, high-resolution MR imaging of the human indusium griseum. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  D Yves von Cramon,et al.  Diffuse axonal injury associated with chronic traumatic brain injury: evidence from T2*-weighted gradient-echo imaging at 3 T. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  Thomas Wisniewski,et al.  Detection of Alzheimer's amyloid in transgenic mice using magnetic resonance microimaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  John Huston,et al.  Reduction of RF power for magnetization transfer with optimized application of RF pulses in k‐space , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  M. Bernstein,et al.  High‐resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: Technical considerations and initial experience , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  John F Schenck,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of brain iron , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[7]  E Moser,et al.  Multivoxel 3D proton spectroscopy in the brain at 1.5 versus 3.0 T: signal-to-noise ratio and resolution comparison. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[8]  M Hedehus,et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: initial observations. , 2001, Radiology.

[9]  Markus Barth,et al.  High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Venography of Brain Tumors at 3 Tesla: First Clinical Experience and Comparison with 1.5 Tesla , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[10]  S. Holland,et al.  NMR relaxation times in the human brain at 3.0 tesla , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  R. Jacobs,et al.  In vivo trans‐synaptic tract tracing from the murine striatum and amygdala utilizing manganese enhanced MRI (MEMRI) , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  C. Matula,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Enhancement of Brain Tumors at 3 Tesla Versus 1.5 Tesla , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Imaging at high magnetic fields: initial experiences at 4 T. , 1993, Magnetic resonance quarterly.

[14]  M Alecci,et al.  Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: Experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Yoshiharu Tamakawa,et al.  The substantia nigra in Parkinson disease: proton density-weighted spin-echo and fast short inversion time inversion-recovery MR findings. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Morphologic phenotyping with MR microscopy: the visible mouse. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  Jens Frahm,et al.  In vivo 3D MRI staining of mouse brain after subcutaneous application of MnCl2 , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  T Nakada,et al.  High-resolution T2-reversed magnetic resonance imaging on a high magnetic field system. Technical note. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[19]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Alan H Wilman,et al.  Application of magnetization transfer at 3.0 T in three‐dimensional time‐of‐flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial arteries , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  J. Frahm,et al.  Mapping of retinal projections in the living rat using high‐resolution 3D gradient‐echo MRI with Mn2+‐induced contrast , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  T. Nakada,et al.  High-field magnetic resonance imaging in patients with moyamoya disease. , 2001, Journal of neurosurgery.

[23]  L. Hedlund,et al.  Magnetic resonance histology for morphologic phenotyping , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: Optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS) , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  R. Turner,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex at 4 and 1.5 tesla using deoxygenation contrast EPI , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  M. Schnall,et al.  Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.