Scintillation effects and the optimal sequence of deformable mirrors in multi-conjugate adaptive optics

Abstract. Multi-conjugate adaptive optics (MCAO) uses two or more deformable mirrors (DMs) at conjugate altitudes approximately matched to the atmospheric turbulence layers to increase the corrected field of view. An important unresolved problem for MCAO is determining the optimal sequence of the DMs. Theoretical considerations and numerical studies suggest that ordering the DMs from lowest to highest altitude reduces the effects of scintillation, whereas on-sky experiments report that the best performance is attained with the ground-layer DM placed last. Using analytical calculations and numerical experiments with Fresnel propagation of Kolmogorov turbulence, we demonstrate that the scintillation results from spatial frequencies higher than the spatial sampling of high-altitude DMs are able to correct. Hence, the effect of scintillation is not impacted by MCAO correction regardless of the sequence of the DMs. Using end-to-end numerical simulations, we find that the dynamic misregistration between the DMs and the wavefront sensors is minimized by placing the ground-layer DM last, leading to increased loop stability and lower wavefront errors. Contrary to conventional wisdom, we recommend that the DMs be sequenced from highest to lowest altitude.

[1]  Thomas R. Rimmele,et al.  Solar Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics at the Dunn Solar Telescope , 2010 .

[2]  Marcos A. van Dam,et al.  Overcoming the effect of pupil distortion in multiconjugate adaptive optics , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[3]  Thomas Berkefeld,et al.  Results of the multi-conjugate adaptive optics system at the German solar telescope, Tenerife , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[4]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Simulating Astronomical Adaptive Optics Systems Using Yao , 2013 .

[5]  J. Hardy,et al.  Adaptive Optics for Astronomical Telescopes , 1998 .

[6]  Dirk Schmidt,et al.  On the sequence of deformable mirrors in MCAO: findings from an on-sky, closed-loop experiment , 2020, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[7]  R C Flicker Sequence of phase correction in multiconjugate adaptive optics. , 2001, Optics letters.

[8]  Charles P. Cavedoni,et al.  Gemini multiconjugate adaptive optics system review - I. Design, trade-offs and integration , 2013, 1310.6199.

[9]  Francois Rigaut,et al.  Clear widens the field for observations of the Sun with multi-conjugate adaptive optics , 2017 .

[10]  Richard J. Sasiela,et al.  Electromagnetic Wave Propagation in Turbulence: Evaluation and Application of Mellin Transforms , 1994 .

[11]  James Osborn,et al.  Deformable Mirror configuration in MCAO: is propagation a fundamental limit on visible wavelength correction? , 2017 .

[12]  David L. Fried,et al.  Least-square fitting a wave-front distortion estimate to an array of phase-difference measurements , 1977 .

[13]  Thomas Berkefeld,et al.  Latest achievements of the MCAO testbed for the GREGOR Solar Telescope , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  Roberto Ragazzoni,et al.  MAD the ESO multi-conjugate adaptive optics demonstrator , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Sarah J. Diggs,et al.  Gemini multiconjugate adaptive optics system review – II. Commissioning, operation and overall performance , 2014, 1402.6906.

[16]  John E. Krist,et al.  PROPER: an optical propagation library for IDL , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  Marcos A. van Dam Wavefront Reconstruction and Control , 2021, The WSPC Handbook of Astronomical Instrumentation.

[18]  Thomas Berkefeld,et al.  Multi-conjugate solar adaptive optics with the VTT and GREGOR , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Thomas Berkefeld Status of the preparatory work for the 4m European Solar Telescope , 2018, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.