Adaptive, but not condition‐dependent, body shape differences contribute to assortative mating preferences during ecological speciation

Assortative mating is critical for reproductive isolation during speciation; however, the mechanisms underlying mating preferences are often unknown. Assortative mating can be mediated through preferences for condition‐dependent and adaptive (“magic”) traits, but rigorously testing these hypotheses has been impeded by trait covariation in living organisms. We used computer‐generated models to examine the role of body shape in producing association preferences between fish populations undergoing ecological speciation in different habitat types. We demonstrate that body shape can serve as an adaptive trait (variation in head size between populations) and a condition‐dependent signal (variation in abdominal distention among individuals). Female preferences for stimuli varying in only one aspect of body shape uncovered evidence for body shape as a magic trait across population pairs, but no evidence for body shape serving as a condition‐dependent signal. Evolution of preferences only in females from one habitat type as well as stronger preferences in sympatric nonsulfidic as opposed to allopatric nonsulfidic populations suggests that reinforcement may have played a role in producing the observed patterns.

[1]  Joanna L. Kelley,et al.  The Evolutionary Ecology of Animals Inhabiting Hydrogen Sulfide–Rich Environments , 2016 .

[2]  Marco Gamba,et al.  BORIS: a free, versatile open‐source event‐logging software for video/audio coding and live observations , 2016 .

[3]  Gil G. Rosenthal,et al.  anyFish 2.0: An open-source software platform to generate and share animated fish models to study behavior , 2015 .

[4]  T. Veen,et al.  Liking the good guys: amplifying local adaptation via the evolution of condition‐dependent mate choice , 2015, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[5]  C. Passow,et al.  Reduction of Energetic Demands through Modification of Body Size and Routine Metabolic Rates in Extremophile Fish , 2015, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[6]  L. Arias-Rodriguez,et al.  Patterns of Macroinvertebrate and Fish Diversity in Freshwater Sulphide Springs , 2014 .

[7]  David Bierbach,et al.  GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND SELECTION AGAINST MIGRANTS IN EVOLUTIONARILY REPLICATED EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  A. Lamboj,et al.  The Rediscovery of a Long Described Species Reveals Additional Complexity in Speciation Patterns of Poeciliid Fishes in Sulfide Springs , 2013, PloS one.

[9]  S. Gavrilets,et al.  Evolution of mate choice and the so-called magic traits in ecological speciation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[10]  C. Martin STRONG ASSORTATIVE MATING BY DIET, COLOR, SIZE, AND MORPHOLOGY BUT LIMITED PROGRESS TOWARD SYMPATRIC SPECIATION IN A CLASSIC EXAMPLE: CAMEROON CRATER LAKE CICHLIDS , 2013, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  M. Head,et al.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[12]  T. Mitchell-Olds,et al.  Complex trait divergence contributes to environmental niche differentiation in ecological speciation of Boechera stricta , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[13]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Opposite effects of learning cause asymmetric mate preferences in hybridizing species , 2012 .

[14]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Magic cues versus magic preferences in speciation , 2012 .

[15]  M. Servedio,et al.  Sexual selection and magic traits in speciation with gene flow , 2012 .

[16]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The relationship between intraspecific assortative mating and reproductive isolation between divergent populations , 2012 .

[17]  N. Patrik What is ecological speciation , 2012 .

[18]  M. Cummings,et al.  How female size and male displays influence mate preference in a swordtail , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Effects of sensory modality on learned mate preferences in female swordtails , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Karin L. Akre,et al.  Signal Perception in Frogs and Bats and the Evolution of Mating Signals , 2011, Science.

[21]  David Bierbach,et al.  EVOLUTION IN EXTREME ENVIRONMENTS: REPLICATED PHENOTYPIC DIFFERENTIATION IN LIVEBEARING FISH INHABITING SULFIDIC SPRINGS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  Alicia M. Frame,et al.  Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[23]  M. Tobler,et al.  Convergent Patterns of Body Shape Differentiation in Four Different Clades of Poeciliid Fishes Inhabiting Sulfide Springs , 2011, Evolutionary Biology.

[24]  Kevin L. Woo,et al.  From dummies to animations: a review of computer-animated stimuli used in animal behavior studies , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  J. Losos,et al.  CONVERGENCE, ADAPTATION, AND CONSTRAINT , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[26]  I. Schlupp,et al.  Costly interactions between the sexes: combined effects of male sexual harassment and female choice? , 2011 .

[27]  O. Seehausen,et al.  Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[28]  L. Harmon,et al.  “SAME SAME BUT DIFFERENT”: REPLICATED ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION AT WHITE SANDS , 2011, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[30]  Alexandra Oranth,et al.  Complementary effect of natural and sexual selection against immigrants maintains differentiation between locally adapted fish , 2010, Naturwissenschaften.

[31]  M. Schartl,et al.  A novel, sexually selected trait in poeciliid fishes: female preference for mustache-like, rostral filaments in male Poecilia sphenops , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Do female association preferences predict the likelihood of reproduction? , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  F. Weissing,et al.  On the Origin of Species by Natural and Sexual Selection , 2009, Science.

[34]  M. Cummings,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Topi K. Lehtonen,et al.  Color Assortative Mating Contributes to Sympatric Divergence of Neotropical Cichlid Fish , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[36]  H. Fisher,et al.  Multivariate male traits misalign with multivariate female preferences in the swordtail fish, Xiphophorus birchmanni , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  Genetics and ecological speciation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  P. Nosil,et al.  The Genetics and Ecology of Reinforcement , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[39]  R. Langerhans,et al.  Trade‐off between steady and unsteady swimming underlies predator‐driven divergence in Gambusia affinis , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[40]  C. Cooper,et al.  The inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase by the gases carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide: chemical mechanism and physiological significance , 2008, Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes.

[41]  N. Metcalfe,et al.  Context-dependent mate choice in relation to social composition in green swordtails Xiphophorus helleri , 2008 .

[42]  C. Jiggins Ecological Speciation in Mimetic Butterflies , 2008 .

[43]  I. Schlupp,et al.  Audience effect alters mating preferences in a livebearing fish, the Atlantic molly, Poecilia mexicana , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[44]  M. Morris,et al.  Female preference variation has implications for the maintenance of an alternative mating strategy in a swordtail fish , 2007, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  R. Langerhans,et al.  ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION IN GAMBUSIA FISHES , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[46]  O. Giere,et al.  Survival in an extreme habitat: the roles of behaviour and energy limitation , 2007, Naturwissenschaften.

[47]  Jennifer Small,et al.  Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences , 2006, Current Biology.

[48]  H. Fisher,et al.  Female swordtail fish use chemical cues to select well-fed mates , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  I. Schlupp,et al.  Reduction of the association preference for conspecifics in cave-dwelling Atlantic mollies, Poecilia mexicana , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  M. Cummings,et al.  Repeatability and consistency of female preference behaviours in a northern swordtail, Xiphophorus nigrensis , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  O. Giere,et al.  Life on the edge: hydrogen sulfide and the fish communities of a Mexican cave and surrounding waters , 2006, Extremophiles.

[52]  M. Morris,et al.  Larger swordtail females prefer asymmetrical males , 2006, Biology Letters.

[53]  Gil G. Rosenthal,et al.  Female Disdain for Swords in a Swordtail Fish , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[54]  Ingo Schlupp,et al.  Cave molly females (Poecilia mexicana, Poeciliidae, Teleostei) like well-fed males , 2005, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[55]  H. Rundle,et al.  Ecological speciation: Ecological speciation , 2005 .

[56]  N. Barton Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species , 2004 .

[57]  Kevin Fowler,et al.  Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[58]  M. Noor,et al.  The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data , 2003 .

[59]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Coevolution of costly mate choice and condition-dependent display of good genes , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[60]  P. Nicoletto,et al.  Female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the interaction between male color and display , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[61]  D. Schluter Ecology and the origin of species. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[62]  M. Kirkpatrick Reinforcement during ecological speciation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  M. Higgie,et al.  Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. , 2000, Science.

[64]  P. McGregor,et al.  Considerations on the use of video playbacks as visual stimuli: the Lisbon workshop consensus , 2000, acta ethologica.

[65]  I. Schlupp,et al.  A Sexual Preference in the Amazon Molly, Poecilia formosa , 1999, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[66]  C. Gabor Association patterns of sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna): alternative hypotheses , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[67]  G. Rosenthal,et al.  Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  H. Rundle,et al.  REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[69]  H. A. Orr,et al.  “PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA” REVISITED , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[70]  M. Ryan,et al.  Mixed-species shoals and the maintenance of a sexual–asexual mating system in mollies , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[71]  M. A. R. Koehl,et al.  WHEN DOES MORPHOLOGY MATTER , 1996 .

[72]  C. Klingenberg,et al.  HETEROCHRONY AND ALLOMETRY: LESSONS FROM THE WATER STRIDER GENUS LIMNOPORUS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[73]  Astrid Kodric-Brown,et al.  Female choice of multiple male criteria in guppies: interacting effects of dominance, coloration and courtship , 1993, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[74]  W. J. Matthews,et al.  Does morphology predict ecology? Hypothesis testing within a freshwater stream fish assemblage , 1992 .

[75]  Geoffrey E. Hill,et al.  Female house finches prefer colourful males: sexual selection for a condition-dependent trait , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  J. Endler,et al.  Parasite load predicts mate choice in guppies , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[77]  M. Andersson EVOLUTION OF CONDITION‐DEPENDENT SEX ORNAMENTS AND MATING PREFERENCES: SEXUAL SELECTION BASED ON VIABILITY DIFFERENCES , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[78]  Rüdiger Riesch,et al.  Hydrogen Sulfide-Toxic Habitats , 2015 .

[79]  R. Langerhans,et al.  Colonisation of toxic environments drives predictable life-history evolution in livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). , 2014, Ecology letters.

[80]  Gil G. Rosenthal,et al.  anyFish: an open-source software to generate animated fish models for behavioural studies , 2013 .

[81]  R. Langerhans,et al.  Sexual selection paves the road to sexual isolation during ecological speciation , 2013 .

[82]  Culumbera,et al.  Mating preferences do not maintain the tailspot polymorphism in the platyfish , Xiphophorus variatus , 2013 .

[83]  G. Grether,et al.  Food availability and parasite infection influence mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2009 .

[84]  M. Plath,et al.  Compensatory behaviour in response to sulphide-induced hypoxia affects time budgets, feeding efficiency, and predation risk , 2009 .

[85]  H. David Sheets,et al.  Geometric morphometrics for biologists : a primer , 2004 .

[86]  P. D. Lorch,et al.  Condition-dependent sexual selection can accelerate adaptation , 2003 .

[87]  I. Schlupp,et al.  The role of experience in mating preferences of the unisexual amazon molly , 1999 .

[88]  M. Noor Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. , 1999, Heredity.

[89]  D. Schluter,et al.  Evidence for Ecological Speciation and Its Alternative , 2022 .