OBJECTIVE
Our purpose was to compare four microendoscopes to evaluate their clinical and cost effectiveness.
STUDY DESIGN
The experience of 27 patients scheduled for diagnostic or minor operative procedures is reported. All patients had microendoscopic laparoscopy performed using the Medical Dynamics optical catheter (Englewood, Col.), the Origin Pixie microendoscope (Menlo Park, Calif.), the Imagyn Microlap (Laguna Niquel, Calif.), or the Karl Storz microendoscope (Culver City, Calif.). A 5 mm conventional laparoscope was used when visualization was inadequate.
RESULTS
Thirteen patients had tubal sterilization. Fourteen patients had diagnostic laparoscopy. For 22 patients the microendoscopes were adequate. The remaining 5 patients required the use of a 5 mm laparoscope to complete the procedure. Among the microendoscopes, the Imagyn Microlap was considered to have the best combination of field of vision, clinical adaptability, ease of operation, mode of sterilization, and operating cost. The 5 mm endoscope provided the best visualization at the lowest overall cost.
CONCLUSION
Microendoscopes are adequate for diagnostic and minor operative procedures. The 5 mm endoscope is the most clinically cost effective.
[1]
B. Love,et al.
Low-cost office laparoscopic sterilization.
,
1994,
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.
[2]
Steege Jf.
Repeated clinic laparoscopy for the treatment of pelvic adhesions: A pilot study
,
1994
.
[3]
D. Molloy.
The diagnostic accuracy of a microlaparoscope.
,
1995,
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.
[4]
K. Hatch,et al.
Office laparoscopy and biopsy for evaluation of patients with intraperitoneal carcinomatosis using a new optical catheter.
,
1992,
Gynecologic oncology.
[5]
J. Ræder,et al.
Laparoscopic Sterilization Under Local or General Anesthesia? A Randomized Study
,
1993,
Obstetrics and gynecology.