Navigation Patterns and Usability of Zoomable User Interfaces with and without an Overview

The literature on information visualization establishes the usability of interfaces with an overview of the information space, but for zoomable user interfaces, results are mixed. We compare zoomable user interfaces with and without an overview to understand the navigation patterns and usability of these interfaces. Thirty-two subjects solved navigation and browsing tasks on two maps. We found no difference between interfaces in subjects’ ability to solve tasks correctly. Eighty percent of the subjects preferred the interface with an overview, stating that it supported navigation and helped keep track of their position on the map. However, subjects were faster with the interface without an overview when using one of the two maps. We conjecture that this difference was due to the organization of that map in multiple levels, which rendered the overview unnecessary by providing richer navigation cues through semantic zooming. The combination of that map and the interface without an overview also improved subjects’ recall of objects on the map. Subjects who switched between the overview and the detail windows used more time, suggesting that integration of overview and detail windows adds complexity and requires additional mental and motor effort. Categories and Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User Interfaces—evaluation/methodology; interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation); 1.3.6 [Computer Graphics]: Methodology and Techniques—interaction techniques

[1]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Empirical evaluation of information visualizations: an introduction , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[2]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces , 1995, CHI '95.

[3]  Saul Greenberg,et al.  Navigating hierarchically clustered networks through fisheye and full-zoom methods , 1996, TCHI.

[4]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Image-Browser Taxonomy and Guidelines for Designers , 1995, IEEE Softw..

[5]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+detail interfaces , 2001, CHI.

[6]  James D. Hollan,et al.  KidPad: a design collaboration between children, technologists, and educators , 1997, CHI.

[7]  Norman G. Vinson,et al.  Design guidelines for landmarks to support navigation in virtual environments , 1999, CHI '99.

[8]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Illusions of infinity: feedback for infinite worlds , 2000, UIST '00.

[9]  John Q. Walker,et al.  Navigational techniques to improve the display of large two-dimensional spaces , 1990 .

[10]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps , 2001, UIST '01.

[11]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Disorientation in Electronic Environments: A Study of Hypertext and Continuous Zooming Interfaces , 1996 .

[12]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization , 2000, AVI '00.

[13]  George W. Furnas,et al.  MuSE: a multiscale editor , 1998, UIST '98.

[14]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation , 1998, UIST '98.

[15]  Chris North,et al.  Snap-together visualization: can users construct and operate coordinated visualizations? , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Multiple representations for cartographic objects in a multi-scale tree - An intelligent graphical zoom , 1994, Comput. Graph..

[17]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Graphical multiscale Web histories: a study of padprints , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[18]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Do Thematic Maps Improve Information Retrieval? , 1999, INTERACT.

[19]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Constant information density in zoomable interfaces , 1998, AVI '98.

[20]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Visual information seeking: tight coupling of dynamic query filters with starfield displays , 1994, CHI '94.

[21]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The information visualizer, an information workspace , 1991, CHI.

[22]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Jazz: an extensible zoomable user interface graphics toolkit in Java , 2000, UIST '00.

[23]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Image Browsers: Taxonomy, Guidelines, and Informal Specifications , 1994 .

[24]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Pad++: A Zoomable Graphical Sketchpad For Exploring Alternate Interface Physics , 1996, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[25]  Emmanuel Barillot,et al.  Context and interaction in zoomable user interfaces , 2000, AVI '00.

[26]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  Designing a real-time telepathology workstation to mitigate communication delays , 1998, Interact. Comput..

[27]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface , 1988, CHI '88.

[28]  Takeo Igarashi,et al.  Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents , 2000, UIST '00.

[29]  Stephen G. Eick,et al.  Seesoft-A Tool For Visualizing Line Oriented Software Statistics , 1992, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[30]  Chris North,et al.  User controlled overviews of an image library: a case study of the visible human , 1996, DL '96.

[31]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  Goal-directed zoom , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[32]  Ken Perlin,et al.  Pad: an alternative approach to the computer interface , 1993, SIGGRAPH.

[33]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Does zooming improve image browsing? , 1999, DL '99.

[34]  Benjamin B. Bederson,et al.  Does animation help users build mental maps of spatial information? , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis'99).

[35]  Chris North,et al.  Snap-Together Visualization: Evaluating Coordination Usage and Construction , 1999 .