Two-dimensional gradient platforms for rapid assessment of dental polymers: a chemical, mechanical and biological evaluation.

OBJECTIVES The increased usage of composite dental restorations underscores the need for continued improvements in material properties. Well-controlled sample fabrication and reproducible methods to quantify and compare material properties will accelerate material design and optimization. Our objectives were to fabricate samples encompassing a range of processing parameters and develop techniques that systematically quantify multiple properties of these samples, thus reducing sample-to-sample variation while concurrently testing numerous processing conditions. METHODS Gradient samples were prepared to evaluate the effects of composition and irradiation time. Comonomer ratio of 2,2-bis[p-2'-hydroxy-3'-methacryloxypropoxy]-phenyl]propane (BisGMA) and triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA) was varied discretely, and irradiation time was varied continuously across each composition. Degree of conversion was measured using infrared spectroscopy, mechanical properties were evaluated using nanoindentation, and cell viability and density were quantified using fluorescence microscopy. RESULTS Higher BisGMA contents increased elastic moduli while higher TEGDMA contents increased conversions. Cell response depended only on irradiation time and not composition, with conversions of at least 52% and 60% required for unaffected viability and cell density, respectively. A single composition-irradiation combination to achieve all of the 'best' properties (highest conversion, highest elastic modulus, lack of cytotoxicity) was not identified, illustrating the necessity of testing all combinations for multiple relevant properties. SIGNIFICANCE Simultaneously screening composition and conversion increased the experimental throughput and allowed for the quantification of chemical, mechanical, and biological properties in a controlled, reproducible fashion. This 2D gradient approach is useful for optimizing compositions and processing parameters to achieve the desired combination of properties.

[1]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Graded Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Human Crown Dentin , 2001, Calcified Tissue International.

[2]  D. Watts,et al.  Resin composite monomers alter MTT and LDH activity of human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  Carl G. Simon,et al.  High‐Throughput Method for Determining Modulus of Polymer Blends , 2004 .

[4]  Newell R Washburn,et al.  Combinatorial screening of cell proliferation on poly(L-lactic acid)/poly(D,L-lactic acid) blends. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[5]  Thomas J. Wyrobek,et al.  Nanomechanical property screening of combinatorial thin-film libraries by nanoindentation , 2004 .

[6]  A J Feilzer,et al.  Effect of TEGDMA/BisGMA Ratio on Stress Development and Viscoelastic Properties of Experimental Two-paste Composites , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[7]  Eric J Amis,et al.  Reaching beyond discovery , 2004, Nature materials.

[8]  K. Hiller,et al.  Cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of dental composite materials. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[9]  J. M. Chalmers,et al.  Specular reflectance: A convenient tool for polymer characterization by FTIR-microscopy? , 1996 .

[10]  T. Ikemi,et al.  Effect of base monomer's refractive index on curing depth and polymerization conversion of photo-cured resin composites. , 2005, Dental materials journal.

[11]  J. Stansbury,et al.  Determination of double bond conversion in dental resins by near infrared spectroscopy. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  E Asmussen,et al.  Influence of UEDMA BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. , 1998, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[13]  J. Puskas,et al.  A new high‐throughput approach to measure copolymerization reactivity ratios using real‐time FTIR monitoring , 2004 .

[14]  Peter M. Johnson,et al.  High throughput kinetic analysis of photopolymer conversion using composition and exposure time gradients , 2005 .

[15]  R. Sakaguchi,et al.  Review of the current status and challenges for dental posterior restorative composites: clinical, chemistry, and physical behavior considerations. Summary of discussion from the Portland Composites Symposium (POCOS) June 17-19, 2004, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  Carl G. Simon,et al.  Characterization of Combinatorial Polymer Blend Composition Gradients by FTIR Microspectroscopy , 2004, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[17]  Robert Langer,et al.  Combinatorial Material Mechanics: High‐Throughput Polymer Synthesis and Nanomechanical Screening , 2005 .

[18]  LeeAnn O. Bailey,et al.  Macrophage response to methacrylate conversion using a gradient approach. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[19]  Eric J. Amis,et al.  Combinatorial Approach to Characterizing Epoxy Curing , 2004 .

[20]  Sheng Lin-Gibson,et al.  Combinatorial investigation of the structure-properties characterization of photopolymerized dimethacrylate networks. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[21]  W. Geurtsen,et al.  Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. , 2000, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.