Introduction: Chaos, Complexity and Organization Theory

Chaos and complexity science are part of an emerging new imagery in the scientific and lay cultures, which helps us conceive of the social world as chaosmos-a combination of chaos and cosmos, disorder and order. Notions like nonlinearity, sensitivity to initial conditions, iteration, feedback loops, novelty, process, emergence and unpredictability, which for a long time were not part of mainstream science, have now come to the fore and furnish us with a new vocabulary in terms of which we may attempt to redescribe organizations, and the social world in general. The Newtonian style, whose most significant feature has been the pursuit of the decontextualized ideal, is gradually receding in favour of the chaotic style—the ability to notice instability, disorder, novelty, emergence and self-organization. For organization theory, it is argued that such developments are of great importance for they make central to our study of organizations) the notions of time, history, human finitude, freedom and circularity of behaviour. Moreover, the chaotic style, by privileging qualitative analysis, favours narrative descriptions of organizational phenomena.

[1]  Douglas Polley,et al.  Turbulence in Organizations: New Metaphors for Organizational Research , 1997 .

[2]  I. Cohen Natural images in economic thought: Newton and the social sciences, with special reference to economics, or, the case of the missing paradigm , 1994 .

[3]  E. Bannet Analogy as Translation: Wittgenstein, Derrida, and the Law of Language , 1997 .

[4]  Mustafa Emirbayer Manifesto for a Relational Sociology1 , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  B. K. Burton,et al.  Chaos and Complexity Theory for Management , 1994 .

[6]  S. Cummings,et al.  Marginalization and Recovery: The Emergence of Aristotelian Themes in Organization Studies , 1997 .

[7]  E. Lorenz Deterministic nonperiodic flow , 1963 .

[8]  James D. Thompson On Building an Administrative Science , 1956 .

[9]  W. Arthur,et al.  Increasing returns and the new world of business. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[10]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  The word and the world: a critique of representationalism in management research , 1998 .

[11]  R. Stacey The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[12]  Friedrich A. von Hayek,et al.  The Pretence of Knowledge , 1975 .

[13]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool , 1995 .

[14]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Mechanisms, organisms and social systems , 1984 .

[15]  George A. Reisch,et al.  Chaos, History, and Narrative , 1991 .

[16]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  More Heat Than Light: Economics as Social Physics , 1989 .

[17]  Hal B. Gregersen,et al.  Chaos Theory and Its Implications for Social Science Research , 1993 .

[18]  R. Thietart,et al.  Chaos Theory and Organization , 1995 .

[19]  N. Katherine Hayles,et al.  Chaos and order : complex dynamics in literature and science , 1991 .

[20]  C. Knudsen,et al.  Equilibrium, Perfect Rationality and the Problem of Self-Reference in Economics , 1993 .

[21]  Carl A. Matheson,et al.  Chaos and Literature , 1997 .

[22]  Peter Gould,et al.  A critique of dissipative structures in the human realm , 1987 .

[23]  Philip Mirowski Physics and the 'Marginalist Revolution.' , 1984 .