A Cross- Linguistic Study in Learning Prosodic Rhythms: Rules, Constraints, and Similarity

Differences in the learnability of linguistic patterns may be crucial in deciding among alternative learning models. This paper compares the ability of English speakers (Experiment1) and Portuguese speakers (Experiment 2) to learn two complex rhythm patterns observed in languages with primary word stress. Subjects were familiarized with one of two rhythms during a discrimination task, followed by a recognition task which tested whether knowledge of the rhythm generalized to novel stimuli. The main findings were: (1) speakers trained on the cross-linguisticallyless common rhythm distinguished between novel stimuli which did or didnot conform to their training rhythm, while speakers trained on the more common rhythm did not;(2) English speakers were biased more strongly than Portuguese speakers against final stress; and (3) melodies that are on a boundary between rhythm categories were treated as less prototypical than other members of the same rhythm category. The results demonstrate that knowledge of complex linguistic rhythms can be generalized after very little training, and that the less common rhythm is easier to learn even though it seems more complex. The results are compared with general-purpose exemplar-based learning models as well as abstract linguistic theories of word stress acquisition.

[1]  C. Baltaxe,et al.  Principles of phonology , 1969 .

[2]  Leda Bisol O ACENTO E O PÉ MÉTRICO BINÁRIO , 1992 .

[3]  G. Miller,et al.  Free recall of redundant strings of letters. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Pierre Perruchet,et al.  Synthetic Grammar Learning : Implicit Rule Abstraction or Explicit Fragmentary Knowledge ? Pierre Perruchet and Chantal Pacteau , 1990 .

[5]  A. Reber Transfer of syntactic structure in synthetic languages. , 1969 .

[6]  D. Fry Duration and Intensity as Physical Correlates of Linguistic Stress , 1954 .

[7]  B. Hayes A metrical theory of stress rules , 1980 .

[8]  Über den Einfluss der Komplexbildung auf die effektuelle und generative Hemmung , 1913 .

[9]  Eleanor Rosch,et al.  Principles of Categorization , 1978 .

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  On the genesis of abstract ideas. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  On the primacy of the implicit: Comment on Perruchet and Pacteau. , 1990 .

[12]  L R Squire,et al.  The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  A. Reber Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[14]  L. Petitto,et al.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967, Neurology.

[15]  Nyberg rd,et al.  A Limited Non-Deterministic Parameter-Setting Model , 1991 .

[16]  Z. Dienes,et al.  On the modality independence of implicitly learned grammatical knowledge , 1995 .

[17]  E. Lenneberg Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[18]  J G Martin,et al.  Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior. , 1972, Psychological review.

[19]  Thierry Meulemans,et al.  Associative chunk strength in artificial grammar learning , 1997 .

[20]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[21]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure , 1984 .

[22]  M. Halle,et al.  An essay on stress , 1987 .

[23]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Exercises in Rethinking Innateness: A Handbook for Connectionist Simulations , 1997 .

[24]  George M. Robinson,et al.  Rhythmic Organization in Speech Processing. , 1977 .

[25]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[26]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  An Iterative Strategy for Learning Metrical Stress in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[27]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989). , 1991 .

[28]  LouAnn Gerken,et al.  Young Children′s Representation of Prosodic Phonology: Evidence From English-Speakers′ Weak Syllable Productions , 1994 .

[29]  N. Chater,et al.  Transfer in artificial grammar learning : A reevaluation , 1996 .

[30]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber and Mathews et al. , 1991 .

[31]  M. Pitt,et al.  The use of rhythm in attending to speech. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonological structure in speech recognition , 1986, Phonology.

[33]  David S. Touretzky,et al.  Connectionist Models and Linguistic Theory: Investigations of Stress Systems in Language , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning Artificial Grammars With Competitive Chunking , 1990 .

[35]  D. Fry Experiments in the Perception of Stress , 1958 .

[36]  B. Dresher,et al.  A computational learning model for metrical phonology , 1990, Cognition.

[37]  B. Hayes Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .